Given that they share similar names and themes, it is easy to conflate Price Transparency and the No Surprises Act, but while they are both significant federal provisions that attempt to help consumers understand healthcare pricing, they are quite different.
I fear that an Executive Order dated Feb. 25 may augment that confusion.
First, I want to be clear that while I have sniped at some of the details of both the No Surprises Act and the Price Transparency provision, I wholeheartedly endorse the concept of improving the clarity of medical pricing. I don’t believe pricing constitutes the industry’s shining moment.
But I also understand how confusing the provisions can be, and I worry that this Executive Order will add to the problem. After discussing Price Transparency at some length, the Order says that it will “require the disclosure of the actual prices of items and services, not estimates.” But the Price Transparency provisions already require actual prices and not estimates. Estimates are found in the No Surprises Act.
Let me try to explain the differences.
Price Transparency only applies to hospitals. At the risk of oversimplifying things a bit, it imposes two basic requirements. First, for all services, each hospital has to create machine-readable files that essentially list every negotiated charge with every third-party payer for the service.
Each hospital also must specifically identify the highest and lowest charge. The second requirement is that hospitals create a user-friendly, public-facing list on their websites of shoppable services that are available.
Both requirements specifically use the word “charge.” The machine-readable file and the website are to list your charge. To the best of my knowledge, the word “estimate” doesn’t appear in any Price Transparency discussion.
If you’re thinking about all of the discussion we have had about good-faith estimates, that is part of the No Surprises Act. Good-faith estimates may make pricing more “transparent,” but they are not part of the Price Transparency Act.
The No Surprises Act is arguably more complicated than Price Transparency, because it applies in many different settings and circumstances. First, it applies to all emergency care provided at hospitals and via ground ambulance. It also applies when a patient goes to an in-network hospital, emergency department (ED), or ambulatory surgical center (ASC) but receives care from an out-of-network medical professional. Finally, it also creates a duty to provide good-faith estimates at a long list of facilities and professionals that probably include almost all of our readers.
One of my frustrations with the provision is that it defines the word “facilities” differently for the two requirements. The limits on out-of-network professionals only apply to hospitals, freestanding EDs, and ASCs, while the good-faith estimates apply nearly universally to hospitals, labs, imaging centers, and probably to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).
In each case, the rule refers to the covered parties as “facilities.” They all must give estimates to people who are not using insurance to pay for their care. And in the future, they will have to provide estimates to everyone. So, it is the No Surprises Act, not Price Transparency, that calls for estimates. Is the Executive Order conflating two different provisions? I’m not sure, but it seems like it is. Hospitals need to be sure that they are providing information about their charges to meet the Price Transparency requirements.
On March 26, the following four entities agreed to pay roughly $62 million to settle a whistleblower’s allegations under the False Claims Act: The allegations
“Quality rankings” are often oxymoronic. My local paper recently had a headline asking “Does your clinic measure up? Check Minnesota’s quality rankings.” The paper proceeded to report
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Stop revenue leakage and boost hospital performance by mastering risk adjustment and HCCs. This essential webcast with expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, will reveal how inaccurate patient acuity documentation leads to lost reimbursements through penalties from poor quality scores. Learn the critical differences between HCCs and traditional CCs/MCCs, adapt your CDI workflows, and ensure accurate payments in Medicare Advantage and value-based care models. Perfect for HIM leaders, coders, and CDI professionals. Don’t miss this chance to protect your hospital’s revenue and reputation!
Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!
Uncover critical guidance. Kay Piper provides an interactive review on coding guidelines and more in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance. Kay Piper provides an interactive review on coding guidelines and more in the AHA’s third quarter 2025 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Stay ahead of Medicare Advantage’s 2025-2026 regulatory changes in this critical webcast featuring expert Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM. Learn how new CMS rules limit MA plan denials, protect hospitals from retroactive claim reopenings, and modify Two-Midnight Rule enforcement—plus key insights on omitted SDoH mandates and heightened readmission scrutiny. Discover actionable strategies to safeguard revenue, ensure compliance, and adapt to evolving health equity priorities before the June 2025 deadline. Essential for hospitals, revenue cycle teams, and compliance professionals navigating MA’s shifting landscape.
Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.
Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
