Long-Awaited CMS Fix to the NSA IDR Leaves Plenty to be Desired

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has finally released its long-awaited No Surprises Act (NSA) Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Final Rule, introducing a series of changes that are meant to reshape how payers and providers navigate the NSA arbitration process – but does it actually address the underlying issues with the process? Not according to some.

Since the NSA IDR process began, dispute volumes and costs have far exceeded original projections, as you may have heard my colleagues and me say at least a few times.

The need for upgrades to the process have, at this point, become pretty obvious.

At the same time, the Trump Administration has really been aggressively promoting technology modernization across the federal government, whether that’s moving away from checks for all payments to and from the government or pushing payers and providers to electronic prior authorization. When viewed through that lens, the provisions of the Final Rule feel very consistent with the Administration’s broader approach.

That’s why one of the most important aspects of the Final Rule is the groundwork it lays for an enhanced federal platform to manage the IDR process, called the IDR Gateway.

The vision is to create a centralized online environment where all parties to a dispute can manage negotiations, initiate disputes, exchange notices, submit documentation, track deadlines, and communicate throughout the IDR process.

In many ways, it’s an effort to move the federal IDR program away from a patchwork of email and other manual processes and toward a more modern digital workflow.

The rule also expands the amount of information that health plans must provide with initial payments, to make it easier for providers to determine whether a claim qualifies for federal IDR and to reduce unnecessary administrative friction.

Certified IDR entities will now be required to determine whether a claim is eligible for the NSA IDR process within five business days after selection. New notice requirements, response timelines, and communication standards are intended to create greater consistency and accountability throughout the process.

Another headline change involves the basic cost to use the program. The administrative fee required to enter the federal IDR process will drop dramatically, to just $15 per party, per dispute. CMS hopes that lower fees, combined with more streamlined processes and improved technology, will make the system more accessible and efficient.

But while the rule does introduce meaningful operational and procedural changes, it’s important to take a look at what it does not do: CMS is focused on upgrading the infrastructure that supports the process, rather than fundamentally changing how the IDR process gets results. This leaves many of the issues providers and plans care about still in dispute.

The rule largely avoids addressing ongoing disputes surrounding the Qualifying Payment Amount, or QPA.

Providers have often stated that QPA calculations can significantly influence arbitration outcomes, and may not accurately reflect true market reimbursement rates. Plans believe that Congress specifically chose that as a key factor, and it’s an appropriate benchmark. Those conflicting viewpoints have been the subject of multiple lawsuits (we’re still awaiting a decision on TMA III), and they will likely remain a major point of contention between providers, payers, and regulators.

Similarly, the rule does little to address one of providers’ more practical issues of contention: collecting payment after winning an IDR determination. The Final Rule does not establish any new enforcement mechanisms or create a clear private right of action to collect unpaid IDR awards – another frequent-flyer argument in the courts.

So, this means that the litigation that has shaped much of the No Surprises Act’s implementation is likely to continue. CMS is improving how the process works, but not necessarily changing the underlying disputes that continue to drive conflict between providers and payers. So you’ll likely hear us continue to report on updates to the IDR process for many months to come!

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Cate Brantley, JD

Cate Brantley is a Senior Government Affairs Liaison for Zelis. She has over 9 years of experience in both the public and private sector. Cate is licensed to practice law in the state of Oklahoma.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24