Why American Hospitals Face Benchmarking Challenges

Why American Hospitals Face Benchmarking Challenges

Many hospitals nationwide are facing significant challenges in benchmarking and quality reporting. While it may seem like these issues stem from complex clinical variations, the actual root cause often lies elsewhere – specifically in the inconsistent ways hospitals define and apply admission types.

This inconsistency leads to discrepancies that ripple across data accuracy, performance metrics, and even patient safety reporting.

To clarify some of the confusion we’ve identified in the industry, I’d like to start by explaining the difference between admission type and admission status – two often misunderstood terms.

  • Admission type refers to the urgency of the admission – whether it’s elective, urgent, or emergent – and is based on the patient’s clinical needs.
  • Admission status, on the other hand, is an administrative classification. It designates whether a patient is classified as an inpatient, outpatient, or under observation. This classification is primarily used for billing and regulatory purposes.

While admission status affects operational workflows, the admission type directly impacts quality reporting, especially regarding Patient Safety Indicators, or PSIs.

The National Uniform Billing Committee (NUBC) provides standardized definitions for assigning a patient’s admission type to help reduce variability.

 According to the NUBC:

  • Emergency admissions are defined as cases requiring immediate medical intervention for life-threatening conditions.
  • Urgent admissions are cases that need prompt attention for physical or mental disorders, where the patient is admitted to the first available suitable accommodation.
  • Elective admissions refer to conditions where the patient’s situation allows time to schedule the admission, based on availability.

Despite these precise definitions, hospitals often interpret them differently, which leads to significant discrepancies in reporting and benchmarking.

We’ve observed striking variations in how admit types are classified through benchmarking research. For example:

  • In one benchmarking organization’s data, the top-performing hospital’s admission rates were reported as 4 percent elective, 48 percent urgent, and 45 percent emergent.
  • Now, compare that to the 10th-ranked hospital, which reported 42 percent elective, 22 percent urgent, and 35 percent emergent.

This raises a critical question: Are these differences due to patient populations?

The answer is – it’s unlikely. Instead, these discrepancies reflect how hospitals apply admit type definitions inconsistently.

Our current focus is on the variability between urgent and elective admissions. Inconsistent classifications have the most significant impact on benchmarking and quality metrics, particularly when it comes to Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs)

Developed by AHRQ, PSIs aim to achieve the following:

  1. Promote Patient Safety by identifying potential complications like infections or surgical errors;
  2. Support Quality Improvement with data-driven insights to reduce preventable harm;
  3. Enable Benchmarking to compare hospital performance nationally; and
  4. Inform Public Reporting, influencing hospital rankings and accountability measures.

However, the validity of PSIs relies heavily on accurately classifying admission types. If admission types are misclassified, PSI rates become distorted, affecting not just performance metrics but also patient safety trends.

I’ll explore these issues further at the upcoming National Physician Advisor Conference in Chicago, April 7–10, 2025.

Then, in May, I’ll also present with Cheryl Ericson at the National ACDIS Conference in Orlando, where we’ll explore how inconsistent admission type definitions impact patient safety metrics and regulatory compliance.

Both conferences will focus on the urgent need for standardization within AHRQ guidelines. We’ll highlight variations that are compromising the integrity of benchmarking efforts.

In conclusion, the challenges we’re seeing in benchmarking and quality reporting aren’t due to differences in patient populations.

They stem from inconsistent admission type definitions at the institutional level.

By focusing on the consistent application of national standards, we can improve data accuracy, support more meaningful benchmarking, and ultimately enhance patient outcomes.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

A Potpourri of Regulatory Issues

A Potpourri of Regulatory Issues

Let me start with a topic that was discussed by David Glaser during a recent Monitor Monday broadcast. He noted the federal regulation (42 CFR

Read More
Special Bulletin

The Undoing of SDoH Reporting

Editors Note: This article was originally published on ICD10monitor, April 15, 2025 In a sweeping policy shift, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

The Cost of Ignoring Risk Adjustment: How HCCs Impact Revenue & Compliance

The Cost of Ignoring Risk Adjustment: How HCCs Impact Revenue & Compliance

Stop revenue leakage and boost hospital performance by mastering risk adjustment and HCCs. This essential webcast with expert Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, will reveal how inaccurate patient acuity documentation leads to lost reimbursements through penalties from poor quality scores. Learn the critical differences between HCCs and traditional CCs/MCCs, adapt your CDI workflows, and ensure accurate payments in Medicare Advantage and value-based care models. Perfect for HIM leaders, coders, and CDI professionals.  Don’t miss this chance to protect your hospital’s revenue and reputation!

May 29, 2025
I050825

Mastering ICD-10-CM Coding for Diabetes and it’s Complications: Avoiding Denials & Ensuring Compliance

Struggling with ICD-10-CM coding for diabetes and complications? This expert-led webcast clarifies complex combination codes, documentation gaps, and sequencing rules to reduce denials and ensure compliance. Dr. Angela Comfort will provide actionable strategies to accurately link diabetes to complications, improve provider documentation, and optimize reimbursement—helping coders, CDI specialists, and HIM leaders minimize audit risks and strengthen revenue integrity. Don’t miss this chance to master diabetes coding with real-world case studies, key takeaways, and live Q&A!

May 8, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Medicare Advantage 2026: Navigating New Rules, Denial Protections & SDoH Shifts

Medicare Advantage 2026: Navigating New Rules, Denial Protections & SDoH Shifts

Stay ahead of Medicare Advantage’s 2025-2026 regulatory changes in this critical webcast featuring expert Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM. Learn how new CMS rules limit MA plan denials, protect hospitals from retroactive claim reopenings, and modify Two-Midnight Rule enforcement—plus key insights on omitted SDoH mandates and heightened readmission scrutiny. Discover actionable strategies to safeguard revenue, ensure compliance, and adapt to evolving health equity priorities before the June 2025 deadline. Essential for hospitals, revenue cycle teams, and compliance professionals navigating MA’s shifting landscape.

May 28, 2025
Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Navigating the 3-Day & 1-Day Payment Window: Compliance, Billing, and Revenue Protection

Struggling with CMS’s 3-Day Payment Window? Join compliance expert Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA, CCO, to master billing restrictions for pre-admission and inter-facility services. Learn how to avoid audit risks, optimize revenue cycle workflows, and ensure compliance across departments. Critical for C-suite leaders, providers, coders, revenue cycle teams, and compliance teams—this webcast delivers actionable strategies to protect reimbursements and meet federal regulations.

May 15, 2025
Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Audit-Proof Your Wound Care Procedures: Expert Insights on Compliance and Risk Mitigation

Providers face increasing Medicare audits when using skin substitute grafts, leaving many unprepared for claim denials and financial liabilities. Join veteran healthcare attorney Andrew B. Wachler, Esq., in this essential webcast and master the Medicare audit process, learn best practices for compliant billing and documentation, and mitigate fraud and abuse risks. With actionable insights and a live Q&A session, you’ll gain the tools to defend your practice and ensure compliance in this rapidly evolving landscape.

April 17, 2025
Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Utilization Review Essentials: What Every Professional Needs to Know About Medicare

Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.

March 20, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24