Hold the Line or Consider the Numbers – Inpatient or Observation for MA Patients?

Last week I had an interesting conversation with a case management director about everyone’s favorite topic: the Medicare Advantage (MA) plans. Like all businesses, her hospital had a budget that included inpatient admission volume, and that line item was on her report card.

Now first, let me offer the disclaimer that I am just a doctor and don’t have an MBA, but I think creating a budget for hospitals makes no sense. How can one possibly know how many people are going to get sick and need hospital care in the next year? How can one know how bad the flu season will be? Did any hospital’s 2020 budget, developed in 2019, include a line item for admissions due to a worldwide pandemic? I doubt it.

That said, this hospital’s current inpatient revenue was falling below the budgeted number. And an analysis of the numbers revealed it was due to the aggressive auditing and denying of admissions by MA plans. The hospital had a great utilization review (UR) program, with a first-level review by a nurse with commercial criteria and then referral for secondary review by a physician advisor for Medicare and MA cases that did not pass inpatient criteria to determine if the Two-Midnight Rule was met.

But even with that process, the MA plans were denying a significant number of admissions, usually after discharge. Those that were not overturned on peer-to-peer or formal appeal then had to be rebilled. That meant the hospital received a minimal payment, months after the care was rendered. And as you could imagine, the CFO was not happy about that.

So, her question was whether the hospital should be more conservative with the MA patients – and unless it was a slam-dunk two-midnight case, perhaps placing them in observation was the right thing to do.

So, is it? Well, we have all seen the cartoons with the person having a little angel standing on one shoulder whispering advice and a devil on the other shoulder giving the opposite advice. In this case, on one shoulder is the compliance officer saying, “Always do the right thing; follow the Two-Midnight Rule and the money falls where it falls.” And on the other shoulder is a finance person saying, “We have bills to pay; let’s get paid fast, so use more observation and avoid all that added effort and delay.”

My advice to her was to first get the numbers. We always assume that inpatient pays more than observation, but does it, in their contracts? Perhaps the difference is small, and getting a little less sooner is preferable to fighting for months to try to get the full amount, with the risk of getting denied and only getting paid a few hundred dollars.

Perhaps observation is paid per hour, and a long observation stay pays the same or more than an inpatient admission. Also, determine if those denied claims can be rebilled with observation hours. If you can bill for observation even without an order, that changes the calculation.

Then look at each payer separately. The decision should be different for an MA plan that never seems to approve inpatient care, compared to one for which a significant number of denials are overturned. Move that slider back and forth to match payer behavior.

Although her facility is not a teaching hospital, that should also factor into the equation. Indirect medical education payments from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) only occur with inpatient admissions. The question of refunding the independent medical evaluation (IME) if an MA plan denies an inpatient admission is beyond this discussion, but should also be considered.

She was also concerned with depriving MA patients of their inpatient discharge appeal rights if they use more observation, and that is important, but so far we have seen no indication from CMS that they are concerned about this, as they have received a multitude of complaints about the MA plans, but have yet to rein them in (at least publicly).

Finally, and most importantly, I recommended she let someone else make the final decision. Present the information to your executives and let them guide you. The balance between following the rules compliantly and fighting until the end has to be weighed against the cost of those fights – and maintaining enough cash flow to keep the doors open.

If only we could just take care of patients, and get paid equitably for that care…

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Credentials Council and Government Affairs Committee of the American College of Physician Advisors, on the advisory board of the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24