The consequences of surprise billing issues are worrisome for laypeople.
Sadly, about a month ago my wife broke her arm. She slipped while carrying a box when she was helping with a baby shower.
We went to the emergency room at Mount Sinai Medical Center in Miami (shameless plug: they were great). Since Mount Sinai is a participation provider in our health insurance plan, the emergency room services were performed by an outside physicians’ group and were covered under the No Surprises Act, meaning the physicians’ group can’t balance-bill us for their services. Whether or not Mount Sinai was a participating provider, emergency services are still covered under the related No Surprise Billing Act.
Now comes the tricky part. The hospital told us that she needed to see an orthopedist after putting a cast on her arm. We got the name of an orthopedist who had staffing privileges at Mount Sinai. We scheduled an appointment at her office, which was in a medical office building next to another hospital in our network. All good, you would think, under the Surprise Billing Act; we can’t be balance-billed. Bad news: she needs a plate in her arm, and a surgery is scheduled. We are very surprised when, on the day of the surgery, we are informed that unless we pay a $1,392 co-pay, the surgery will not happen. My wife is in great pain. We pay the co-pay.
After the fact, I found out that the orthopedist was not in my network, and that the bulk of the co-payment was because we were charged at the “out-of-network” rate.
Since the physician worked at two hospitals in my network, and the operation happened in a building adjacent to one of them, how did this not violate the Surprise Billing Act?
While the physician office was indeed next to a participating hospital, it was not in the hospital. While the physician practiced at another participating hospital, the service wasn’t performed in that hospital.
I did file a dispute on the charge. Being a consultant, I have resources, and I may get some of my money back. My question is whether the average patient would have any recourse – or even know to complain?
The Unified Program Integrity Contractors (UPICs) were developed to ensure the integrity of Medicare and Medicaid by identifying and recovering improper payments. Established to streamline
If you listened to Monitor Mondays last week, you heard me talk about how artificial intelligence (AI) can make up answers and provide inaccurate information.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
This third session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review of FY26 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
This second session in our 2026 IPPS Masterclass will feature a review the FY26 changes to ICD-10-PCS codes. This information will be presented by nationally recognized ICD-10 coding expert Christine Geiger, MA, RHIA, CCS, CRC, with bonus insights and analysis from Dr. James Kennedy.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Bring your questions and join the conversation during this open forum series, live every Wednesday at 10 a.m. EST from June 11–July 30. Hosted by Chuck Buck, these fast-paced 30-minute sessions connect you directly with top healthcare experts tackling today’s most urgent compliance and policy issues.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
