Payer Memo Drawing Deserved Scrutiny

Payer Memo Drawing Deserved Scrutiny

Let me start with a few updates today.

I discussed last week the national intravenous fluid shortage. What I had not heard at that point was that there is also a shortage of fluid for peritoneal dialysis. While we can use oral hydration instead of IV fluids, for peritoneal dialysis, the alternative is going back on hemodialysis. Let’s hope that is not necessary. Last week, President Biden invoked the Defense Production Act to speed up the rebuilding of the Baxter plant. Let us all hope this is a short-lived crisis.

Last week, I also mentioned the inappropriate Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) auditor denial of the inpatient total joint replacement because the patient did not have a complication. Well, two other hospitals contacted me, saying that they had received the same denial on a similar patient and will be contacting the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Why is it that the supposed experts cannot interpret the rules properly? I do have to apologize to the CMS staff who now have to deal with this. I am sure they would rather be helping us interpret the new rules for patient appeals after status changes (or maybe not).

And that brings me to the main topic today, a notice from UnitedHealthcare (UHC) about their review process under the Two-Midnight Rule. Thanks to Julie, who forwarded this to me. It seems to have been published in January, but let’s talk about it anyway, since UHC has not updated it, as best as I can tell.

Let me start by crediting UHC for getting some things right. For instance, they state that time alone does not suffice for an inpatient admission to be covered; the two midnights must be reasonable and necessary, without delays or convenience time. As my old colleague Dr. Steve Meyerson famously said, “the Two-Midnight Rule is not a calendar and a crayon, marking off days and admitting after two midnights.” They also acknowledge that they follow the Inpatient-Only (IPO) List, regardless of the length of stay, but they do note that the surgery must be medically necessary. That’s a hidden message saying that “we will still require you go through the time and effort to do prior authorization for most surgery.”

But then they go off the rails. They state, “CMS has explained that hospital stays under 24 hours rarely qualify for payment as an inpatient stay.” And they cite the CMS review guidelines published in November 2015. The problem is that not once in that CMS document is “24 hours” mentioned.

In this document, CMS does, however, discuss one-midnight stays as the rare and unusual exceptions to the two-midnight expectation. At the time, there was only one exception: newly initiated mechanical ventilation. It was not until 2016, after publication of this initial CMS memo, that CMS adopted the case-by-case exception for patients, whereby the physician determines that inpatient admission is warranted despite an expected length of stay of fewer than two midnights.

And in the 2016 Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule, CMS clarified that the addition of this exception “does not define inpatient hospital admissions with expected lengths of stay less than two midnights as rare and unusual. Rather, it modifies our current ‘rare and unusual’ exceptions policy to allow payment on a case-by-case basis.” I will admit this is a brain twister; the policy is called “rare and unusual exceptions,” but not every exception is rare and unusual.

And to top it off, this 2024 document from UHC totally ignores the fact that CMS updated that document at the end of 2015, a month after publishing the first, adding a discussion of the case-by-case exception without mentioning that it should be “rare and unusual.” Why in the world would UHC use the outdated version, if not because it is the one that supports their draconian policies?

They then go on to completely contort CMS’s words in seeming to argue that they can use InterQual criteria to make inpatient admission decisions. They claim they can do that because CMS does not have specific criteria for making medical necessity decisions, and therefore CMS allows them to adopt internal criteria.

The problem is that CMS does have specific criteria for inpatient admission decisions at 42 CFR 412.3, which we all know as the Two-Midnight Rule, with its two-midnight expectation and two-midnight benchmark. If the physician’s judgement is rational, represents the medical standard of care, and is documented, and the care is medically necessary hospital care, then InterQual criteria cannot override that.

And interestingly, as I write this, the content director of InterQual posted on LinkedIn the following: “Commercial medical necessity screening guidelines are developed to screen in that which is clearly appropriate at a particular level of care based on the evidence-base. The Secondary Review process, where clinical judgement comes to bear, has always been a part of the InterQual process.” I do wonder why the payors never got this message…

Now, this UHC memo comes on the heels of the report that UHC is no longer allowing hospitals to bill for observation hours when they deny an inpatient admission, significant anger from the therapy community about UHC’s new onerous rules requiring prior authorization for any outpatient therapy services, and Thursday’s report from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) that UHC was improperly paid over $3.7 billion in 2023 for diagnoses that were only reported from an in-home risk assessment.  

It is really hard to play a game when the opposing team is permitted to rewrite the rules for each game as they see fit, but also employs not only the on-field referees, but also the replay officials.

These views represent those of Dr. Hirsch and not those of his employer, R1 RCM.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

SNFs Under Scrutiny

SNFs Under Scrutiny

Some of you may have noticed that I am not always very nice to some insurance companies. And deservedly so. But I also point out

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Enhancing Outcomes with CDI-Coding-Quality Collaboration in Acute Care Hospitals

Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.

November 21, 2024
Comprehensive Inpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Comprehensive Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: From Foundations to Advanced Strategies

Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.

September 5, 2024
Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Advanced Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Mastering Complex Narratives and Compliance

Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.

September 12, 2024

Foundations of Outpatient Clinical Documentation Integrity: Best Practices for Accurate Coding and Compliance

This webcast, presented by Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, a recognized expert with over 30 years of experience, offers essential strategies to improve outpatient clinical documentation integrity. You will learn how to enhance the accuracy and completeness of patient records by adopting best practices in coding and incorporating Social Determinants of Health (SDOH). The session also highlights the role of technology, such as EHRs and CDI software, in improving documentation quality. By attending, you will gain practical insights into ensuring precise and compliant documentation, supporting patient care, and optimizing reimbursement. This webcast is crucial for those looking to address documentation gaps and elevate their coding practices.

September 5, 2024

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Patient Notifications and Rights: What You Need to Know

Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.

December 5, 2024
Navigating the No Surprises Act & Price Transparency: Essential Insights for Compliance

Navigating the No Surprises Act & Price Transparency: Essential Insights for Compliance

Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks.  Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.

November 19, 2024
Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Post Operative Pain Blocks: Guidelines, Documentation, and Billing to Protect Your Facility

Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.

October 24, 2024
The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

The OIG Update: Targets and Tools to Stay in Compliance

During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.

September 19, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

👻Spooky Sale is Back!👻 Get 31% off all three Medlearn brands, using code SPOOKY24.