The GAO cites deficiencies in the HHS program’s response to past PHEs.
Just last week, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) took a significant step by adding the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) leadership and coordination of public health emergencies (PHEs) to its High Risk List.
The GAO is tasked with being a source of objective, non-partisan information on government operations, so it’s not surprising that they would turn their attention to the whopping $484 billion in COVID-19 relief funds that the HHS has received. Since the 1990s, the GAO has continually been on the lookout for areas of fraud, waste, and abuse, among other program vulnerabilities, and has been supported by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform. Since that time, they have logged hundreds of billions of dollars in financial benefits returned to the federal government from pursuing these areas deemed to be at high risk.
The GAO has been continually hinting at deficiencies in the HHS program’s response to past PHEs. For instance, in a March 2021 report, they stated, “in addition to specific areas that we have designated as high risk, other important challenges facing our nation merit continuing close attention. One of these is HHS’s leadership and coordination of public health emergencies.”
In HHS’s defense, coordinating a multi-agency response to a large-scale emergency is no easy task, even with substantial monetary support. In the end, it’s clear that attention to the matter is warranted, and the GAO knows that leaving deficiencies unaddressed will lessen the nation’s ability to respond to similar public health events in the future.
Now that the HHS is on the High Risk List, the GAO is specifically looking for the HHS to improve in the following areas:
You might find yourself asking, how do you land such a designation, anyway? To determine which federal programs should be designated to be at high risk, the GAO uses its own guidance document considering qualitative risk factors, such as public health or safety, service delivery, national security, or whether the risk could result in significantly impaired services, program failure, injury, or loss of life. It’s also important to consider the risk of exposure from a quantitative perspective.
For instance, at a minimum, the monetary risk must be at the $1 billion mark; the COVID relief funds have certainly met that criterion. Other examples of quantitative vulnerabilities include assets being wasted, underutilized, or having some evidence of improper payments.
Let’s talk about getting off the List. There are five key elements that are carefully watched for as it pertains to progress to evaluate whether the criteria are met, partially met, or not met:
HHS’s new spot on the list does ensure congressional and Executive Branch attention – and perhaps attention is what is required. The GAO will continually monitor HHS’s overall improvement and progress toward these criteria, and hopefully, in the end, this will a result in an improved national emergency response.
About the Author:
Leah is a health information management (HIM) compliance professional with more than 15 years of experience. Leah’s healthcare experience started in direct patient care, providing physical therapy, but now is focused on billing compliance for physician and non-physician practitioner services. Her goal is to protect patients by bringing clarity to complex healthcare regulations.
Contact the Author: leah.akers2008@gmail.com
The Medicare audit landscape has undergone a fundamental transformation, evolving from ad hoc enforcement practices to scientifically rigorous methodological frameworks. This evolution spans two critical
Here are my thoughts on what to expect when the federal shutdown finally ends. First, the lights don’t all flick back on at once. Agencies
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
