The GAO cites deficiencies in the HHS program’s response to past PHEs.
Just last week, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) took a significant step by adding the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) leadership and coordination of public health emergencies (PHEs) to its High Risk List.
The GAO is tasked with being a source of objective, non-partisan information on government operations, so it’s not surprising that they would turn their attention to the whopping $484 billion in COVID-19 relief funds that the HHS has received. Since the 1990s, the GAO has continually been on the lookout for areas of fraud, waste, and abuse, among other program vulnerabilities, and has been supported by the U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and by the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform. Since that time, they have logged hundreds of billions of dollars in financial benefits returned to the federal government from pursuing these areas deemed to be at high risk.
The GAO has been continually hinting at deficiencies in the HHS program’s response to past PHEs. For instance, in a March 2021 report, they stated, “in addition to specific areas that we have designated as high risk, other important challenges facing our nation merit continuing close attention. One of these is HHS’s leadership and coordination of public health emergencies.”
In HHS’s defense, coordinating a multi-agency response to a large-scale emergency is no easy task, even with substantial monetary support. In the end, it’s clear that attention to the matter is warranted, and the GAO knows that leaving deficiencies unaddressed will lessen the nation’s ability to respond to similar public health events in the future.
Now that the HHS is on the High Risk List, the GAO is specifically looking for the HHS to improve in the following areas:
You might find yourself asking, how do you land such a designation, anyway? To determine which federal programs should be designated to be at high risk, the GAO uses its own guidance document considering qualitative risk factors, such as public health or safety, service delivery, national security, or whether the risk could result in significantly impaired services, program failure, injury, or loss of life. It’s also important to consider the risk of exposure from a quantitative perspective.
For instance, at a minimum, the monetary risk must be at the $1 billion mark; the COVID relief funds have certainly met that criterion. Other examples of quantitative vulnerabilities include assets being wasted, underutilized, or having some evidence of improper payments.
Let’s talk about getting off the List. There are five key elements that are carefully watched for as it pertains to progress to evaluate whether the criteria are met, partially met, or not met:
HHS’s new spot on the list does ensure congressional and Executive Branch attention – and perhaps attention is what is required. The GAO will continually monitor HHS’s overall improvement and progress toward these criteria, and hopefully, in the end, this will a result in an improved national emergency response.
About the Author:
Leah is a health information management (HIM) compliance professional with more than 15 years of experience. Leah’s healthcare experience started in direct patient care, providing physical therapy, but now is focused on billing compliance for physician and non-physician practitioner services. Her goal is to protect patients by bringing clarity to complex healthcare regulations.
Contact the Author: leah.akers2008@gmail.com
Risk adjustment has entered a new era. We are no longer operating in a documentation optimization environment; we are operating in an enforcement and recalibration
Hotly anticipated performance targets and payment amounts for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) Model
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
