In the post-public health emergency (PHE) era, I have noticed what I think may be a glitch in the computer system at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Maybe I’m wrong. Let me give you the facts, and you can decide whether it’s a glitch, human error, or a conspiracy against Medicare and Medicaid providers.
Regardless of the reason, it is imperative for physicians to stay abreast of their Medicare and Medicaid privileges. Make a monthly check to see if you’ve been erroneously terminated without your knowledge. Can that really happen, you ask? Being terminated without your knowledge legally should not happen, and you have recourse. But it can happen – and has.
The first instance of this tomfoolery occurred about 3-4 years ago. My client was an internist working in North Carolina and Virginia. North Carolina Medicaid terminated him erroneously; I cannot even remember the reason, but it was wrong. Dr. Doe hired me to get him reinstated, which we promptly did. In the meantime, CMS’s computer system picked up that Dr. Doe had been terminated from North Carolina Medicaid and terminated his Medicare privileges. Dr. Doe had to hire us again for a second erroneous termination. The cycle continued one more time, both in North Carolina and Virginia. He was terminated from Medicaid and Medicare again, and we worked to get him reinstated again.
It turns out that CMS updates its preclusion list every 30 days. Depending on when your state updates its preclusion list, a doctor could be reinstated with Medicare on, say, Sept. 18, 2023. If his or her state Medicaid department checks for Medicare privileges anytime from Sept. 18-30, they would be listed as having no Medicare privileges until CMS updates the program.
Being terminated from Medicare is a quick way to get terminated from Medicaid. You need a lawyer to work both Medicare and the Medicaid angles concurrently. The reason that this is so important is that if a hospital has a physician performing services without Medicare or Medicaid privileges, the hospital then owes an overpayment and will be forced to temporarily fire or suspend the doctor until he is reinstated.
Since that incident, which occurred at the beginning of COVID, about three years ago, 6-7 more almost identical incidents have happened. But not in North Carolina – in Texas, Illinois, New York, Florida, South Carolina, and Nebraska.
So, I started wondering whether there was a large-scale problem with how states and CMS communicate about exclusions. Dr. Doe’s frustrating, cyclical, erroneous terminations from Medicare and Medicaid could be systemic.
The next doctor had been terminated correctly many years ago for an infraction, which he readily admits. He did his penance and paid his dues for his crime. He was back to work as an ER surgeon, and from what I understand, he is excellent at his job, which happens to be in a rural area. Medicare picked up on his infraction four years after he paid for his mistake. Medicare terminated him because he didn’t volunteer his infraction to Medicare.
We all know that failing to volunteer infractions to CMS will get you terminated (or a loss of your privileges). This doctor is a trauma surgeon. In my humble opinion, ER surgeons are the renaissance men or women of the medical world. As I am sure is the case with most ER surgeons, this doctor never filled out his own Medicare and Medicaid re-credentials; someone employed by the hospital always filled out his applications. Ever since he restarted his career, understandably, he did not want to broadcast his infraction. Of course, the management of the rural hospital had actual knowledge of the infraction, but somewhere through the “telephone call game,” employees lower down the totem pole were not informed. So, his Medicare application was submitted with an error that the doctor did not catch. Once the billing department learned of his revoked Medicare privileges, he was suspended without pay.
However, in this case, we approached the situation from two angles; we sought resolution for both Medicare and Medicaid concurrently, because we did not want another cyclical issue.
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
