CMS Tells Livanta to Reassess Short-Stay Memo

CMS Tells Livanta to Reassess Short-Stay Memo

Well, I went and did it.

You have been hearing me talk over the past few weeks about the now-infamous Livanta memo, in which they explained the applicability of the case-by-case exception to the Two-Midnight Rule. As you may recall, this memo had two types of cases they presented in a very comprehensive way, analyzing them in a format that followed the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)-sanctioned flowsheet for determining the applicably of the Two-Midnight Rule.

The two cases cited in the memo involved a patient with gastrointestinal bleeding and another with angioedema. From the descriptions provided, the applicability of the exception to these two cases seemed marginal at best, but who were we to question Livanta, the national short-stay inpatient admission auditor?

As Livanta described it, they did not feel it was their position to second-guess the decision of the physician to admit the patient as an inpatient due to increased risk. I support that, but at the same time, that risk must truly be increased. But risk is not only relative, but subjective. How much added risk warrants inpatient admission? What is the “baseline” risk that should be viewed as the comparator? In their example, perhaps the patient with angioedema manifesting as swelling of the lips would be appropriate for outpatient care, but edema in the throat, even if resolved after ED treatment, makes this patient’s risk high enough to warrant inpatient admission.

In addition, we do not have access to the actual medical records. Did the physician actually document “due to increased risk, inpatient admission is warranted”? If so, that would certainly support Livanta’s approval of inpatient admission, but how often do physicians actually do that?

But it was their statement that any Medicare patient presenting emergently with acute appendicitis or acute cholecystitis who needed surgery could be admitted as inpatient that really raised questions. In both of those cases, the surgery itself is not on the Inpatient-Only List, if done laparoscopically. Of course, that does not mean the patient cannot be admitted as inpatient if they fit the case-by-case exception or were expected to need two or more midnights, such as if perforation or peritonitis was present, but that is not what Livanta was stating. They stated that all such patients could be admitted as inpatients.

When this memo came out, I first corresponded with Livanta, and they continued to support their recommendations. I then contacted CMS and was told that the memo was reviewed and approved for release. Livanta said it and CMS agreed with it. What more was there to do than believe it?

But this just did not sit well with me – or most others. You may recall that I conducted a poll on LinkedIn, and 89 percent of respondents did not agree with this, and stated they would advise outpatient status. So, my next step was to submit a request to CMS to discuss this on the next Open Door Forum. They responded by asking me to send my request to the short-stay review team at CMS.

I was not able to attend the Open Door Forum two weeks ago, but Dr. Stephanie VanZandt from BayCare did attend and asked about the memo. As she describes it, her question was met with crickets. They asked her to submit the question via email.

Well, last week I received another email from the CMS short-stay review team, this time noting that CMS has instructed Livanta to retract the memo pending review.

Now, let me be clear here. I would absolutely love for hospitals to be able to admit all these patients as inpatients and get the DRG (payment for DRG 343 ~$10,000) rather than the outpatient payment (base payment for C-APC 5361 is $5,212) – but at the same time, I am personally committed to maintaining the highest standards in compliance and ethics, and Livanta’s recommendations just did not allow me to do that. I was obligated to get clear and unambiguous clarification.

Ten years of working with the Two-Midnight Rule and seven years with the case-by-case exception told me they were interpreting it improperly. And most of my colleagues felt the same way. In addition, we are less than four months away from the Two-Midnight Rule being applicable to the Medicare Advantage plans, so it is crucial that CMS’s interpretation be clear and unambiguous.

So, what now? Well, we wait. Perhaps CMS will come back and say that Livanta was completely correct. More likely they will make some modifications to the recommendations.

Either one is fine with me, but we all just want something definitive and binding, so we can all teach the rules appropriately and compliantly. 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Knowing the Score: MIPS

Knowing the Score: MIPS

EDITOR’S NOTE: Medicare’s legacy quality reporting programs were consolidated and streamlined into the Merit-Based Incentive Payment System, known as “MIPS.”  The Merit-Based Incentive Payment System

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.

March 21, 2024
Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.

February 22, 2024
Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Join healthcare attorney David Glaser, as he debunks refund myths, clarifies compliance essentials, and empowers healthcare professionals to safeguard facility finances. Uncover the secrets behind when to refund and why it matters. Don’t miss this crucial insight into strategic refund management.

February 29, 2024
Mastering Medicare Notices: Your Essential Guide to the MOON and Beyond

Mastering Medicare Notices: Your Essential Guide to the MOON and Beyond

Hospital staff continue to grapple with the complexities of Medicare notices.  In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, will present the latest requirements for preparation and delivery of CMS-mandated forms, including the Advance Beneficiary Notice (ABN), Hospital-Issued Notices of Noncoverage (HINNs), Important Message from Medicare (IMM) and Medicare Outpatient Observation Notice (MOON), and practical solutions through foolproof workflows and compliance auditing.

January 25, 2024
OBGYN ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding: Mastering Complex Guidelines and Compliance

OBGYN ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding: Mastering Complex Guidelines and Compliance

Dive into the complexities of Obstetrics and Gynecology coding, addressing challenges from antepartum to postpartum care. Learn to decode intricate guidelines, tackle claim denials, and safeguard your practice’s financial health. Uncover the secrets to compliant coding, reducing errors, and optimizing reimbursement. With practical exercises and expert insights, this webcast empowers coders, auditors, and healthcare professionals to elevate their OBGYN coding prowess.

February 28, 2024
Unlocking Clinical Documentation Excellence: Empowering CDISs & Coders

Unlocking Clinical Documentation Excellence: How to Engage the Provider

Uncover effective techniques to foster provider understanding of CDI, empower CDISs and coders to customize their queries for enhanced effectiveness, and learn to engage adult learners, leveraging their experiences for superior learning outcomes. Elevate your CDI expertise, leading to fewer coding errors, reduced claim denials, and minimized audit issues.

December 14, 2023
Coding for Spinal Procedures: A 2-Part Webcast Series

Coding for Spinal Procedures: A 2-Part Webcast Series

This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast series will help you acquire the critical knowledge you need to completely and accurately assign ICD-10-PCS and CPT® codes for spinal fusion and other common spinal procedures.

October 26, 2023

Trending News

It’s Heart Month! Use code HEART24 at checkout to receive 20% off your cardiology products. Click here to view our suite of Cardiology products!