It is equally important to know both what disease ails the patient and where it is taking them.
Keen skills in accurately discerning diagnoses is a critical clinical talent that is a source of personal pride for physicians and professional envy by their peers. Being acknowledged as a ‘good diagnostician’ is a peerless reputation to have in the medicine. In the real world of medical practice and in the fake world of TV medicine, an inerrant diagnosis can be both critical and dramatic.
But what about accurately divining prognoses? Prognosis is the often less valued and neglected step-child of diagnosis. Diagnosis tells us what therapy to give to the patient; it is about the beginning of remedying. Prognosis can tell us when to take these treatments away; prognosis may be about the failure of curing. If either one is neglected, it is tragic for the patient. Proper care of a patient requires not only discriminating what the illness is but also crucially discerning its trajectory. It is equally important to know both what disease ails the patient and where it is taking them. Without a credible prognosis, both the physician and the patient are blind to the medical future. Diagnosis obligates prognosis.
Why would diagnosis predominate over prognosis? Medical detection can be difficult but clinical prophecy can be even more challenging. Also, a skillful diagnosis is often perceived as a success even when a malicious malady is uncovered. This can be an exhilarating demonstration of medical acumen. It is also an opportunity to heal a disease and, perhaps, to save a life. Prognosis, especially a poor prognosis, is less enlivening. It often portends the failure of a treatment and the approach of the patient’s demise. An exacting diagnosis can push the limits of proficiency while a doleful prognosis exposes the limits of expertise.
The inability to accomplish a cure may be instinctively felt as a failing of sorts but the reluctance to conscientiously forecast what is incurable is a failure for sure.
One of the most anguished exclamations heard in medicine comes from patients and their loved ones who learn suddenly that the patient has been unwittingly dying for a while. It is five plaintive words that stingingly resonate in the hearer, “Why didn’t someone tell us?” This utterance arises out of the searing moment of insight that much of the misery, much of the treatment, and many of the hospitalizations have only prolonged suffering without a chance of remedying the cause – that they have been kept alive but will not have their life restored. It is both the recognition that comfort was a possibility that was not proffered and the poignant realization of being in a bed in a hospital when they could have stayed in their bed at home.
Having death foretold doesn’t engender hopelessness, it sanctions the dying and family to prepare for the end of life. It empowers the dying to take control of their final days. The false assurance of life kindles counterfeit hope, it leaves the dying to be surprised by their own. Making a flawed prognosis is innate in human doctors but not communicating a fatal prognosis is inherently inhuman of physicians.
Prognosis is critical to a patient because it provides predictive information to the sick. Predictive information allows a coping strategy to be formulated by the patient and their caretakers. How to tolerate 24 hours of post-operative pain leading to recuperation significantly differs from enduring months of metastatic hurt ending in death. Not knowing what to expect when a patient is in distress is torment; not being told that dying is approaching when the patient can sense death is torture.
Similarly, prognosis is mandatory for the physician because it, too, provides predictive information. Continuous prognostic surveillance permits the physician to recognize when symptom relief is needed in addition to curative treatment – the need for palliative care. Scrutinizing the course of a sickness authorizes the physician to concede when the patient has been mastered by their disease, when beneficial therapies have been exhausted and compassionate comfort is needed – the time for hospice care.
A failure of diagnosis at the start of a disease causes the patient to suffer unnecessarily but the patient may recover with insightful iatrical reconsideration. But a failure to acknowledge a terminal prognosis causes the patient to gratuitously suffer, leaving death as the only exit from their affliction. It is our obligation as physicians to diligently attempt make both an unerring diagnosis and a plausible prognosis.
Diagnosis allows us to treat precisely; prognosis enables us to comfort properly. Bad news is hard to give and harder yet to receive. But hardest yet is to be left wondering at the very end of life, “Why didn’t anyone tell us?”
Indeed, why didn’t someone?
First of all, it was NOT Mouse’s fault. About a month ago, my geriatric, orange tabby cat slipped past me out the door and into
“Inattentional blindness” is a fancy term to describe a very real compliance risk. There’s a great video illustrating the problem which will appear at the
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
