OIG report shines spotlight on area of confusion for billing.
In a recent report, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) announced it has determined that Medicare inappropriately paid acute-care hospitals for outpatient services provided to beneficiaries who were inpatients of other facilities.
Those facilities included Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities (IRFs) along with long-term care hospitals, inpatient psychiatric facilities, and critical access hospitals. As a result, OIG determined that beneficiaries were unnecessarily charged outpatient deductibles and coinsurance payments.
Since the publication of that report in September 2017, we have been receiving queries from our clients related to how this relates to interrupted stays in the IRF, which services the IRF is responsible for providing, and who can and should bill Medicare for those services.
Background
All inpatient hospitals, including IRFs, are required to provide services to their inpatients, either directly or under arrangements with other providers. When “arranged” services are provided, they may be provided by the acute hospital that houses the IRF, by another acute facility, or by an outpatient provider. While the IRF may discharge the beneficiary – regardless of the amount of time the patient is off the unit – it is not necessary.
Medicare has developed specific guidelines for an “interrupted stay” in the IRF, and for how services should be billed for these patients. Please note that this article applies only to the IRF payment provisions, and not to other post-acute settings. For example, the payment and billing guidelines are different for long-term care hospitals.
How Does This Relate to “Interrupted Stays?”
Interrupted stays are defined as those cases in which a Medicare beneficiary is discharged from an IRF and returns to the same IRF within three consecutive calendar days. The three consecutive calendar days begin with the day of the discharge from the IRF and end on midnight of the third day. The IRF Patient Assessment Instrument (IRF-PAI) has specific data fields to capture interrupted stays and the manual provides clear instructions on the completion of the document.
What is not clear in the manual is how to bill for these services, and which providers should do so.
Who Pays and Who Bills?
The Medicare Claims Processing Manual addresses case level adjustments for IRF cases, noting that if the patient returns before midnight of the day the interruption begins, one CMG payment will be made and no payment will be made to the “arranged” provider:
“One CMG payment will be made for interrupted stay cases and the payment will be based on the initial assessment. For example, if a Medicare beneficiary is discharged on Feb. 1, 2001 and is readmitted on Feb. 3, the case would be considered an interrupted stay, and only one CMG payment will be made based on the initial assessment. However, if the Medicare beneficiary was readmitted on Feb. 4, then it would not be considered an interrupted stay. A separate DRG payment will not be made to the acute-care hospital when the beneficiary is discharged and returns to the same IRF on the same day. However, a DRG payment can be made if the beneficiary does not return to the same IRF on the same day as they were discharged.”
What is not clarified in the manual is how billing occurs for these services. National Government Services, however, has prepared an excellent training program available online at www.MedicareUniversity.com that provides excellent guidelines and examples for billing of interrupted stays. Key points from that training include:
The slide below, clipped from one of our own recent training programs, summarizes this information:
The Bottom Line
IRFs need to be aware of the requirements for providing hospital services, both within the facility and under arrangements, but must be equally aware of the requirements for billing and paying for these services.
Picture this: You are driving through an area you don’t know well. It is a cold day. You stop to get gas. You fill the
Coders may very well feel that they have no impact on hospitals under H.R.1, the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Just the opposite
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
