Last week, Gainesville, Florida-based medical device company Exactech Inc. agreed to pay $8 million to resolve allegations that it violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by knowingly selling defective total knee-replacement systems used in knee-replacement surgeries performed on Medicare, Medicaid and Veterans Affairs (VA) beneficiaries.
Because Exactech has filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11, the $8 million settlement amount is based on Exactech’s compromised financial condition, and does not represent the Government’s typical damages calculus in a False Claims Act settlement, which is a multiplier of the actual damages the Government sustained by not receiving the benefit of the fully functional knee replacements it had contracted for and paid to receive.
This case is unusual in that the whistle sounded not once, as is the typical situation in a qui tam case, but twice. The $8 million settlement resolves two separate FCA lawsuits brought by two sets of whistleblowers – a case filed in the Northern District of Alabama by three whistleblowers (Brooks Wallace, Robert Farley, and Dr. Manuel Fuentes) and a case filed in the District of Maryland by Dr. Pasquale Petrera.
In the Alabama case, whistleblowers Wallace and Farley were sales representatives at Exactech, and Dr. Fuentes was a senior member of Exactech’s marketing team. In the Maryland case, whistleblower Dr. Pasquale Petrera is a Maryland orthopedic surgeon who performed knee replacement surgeries using the Exactech devices.
The Alabama whistleblowers will receive a whistleblower award of $1.3 million, and Dr. Petrera will receive a reward of $565,000.
The whistleblowers alleged that during the 10-year period between 2008 and 2018, there were two separate components of Exactech’s total-knee replacement systems that were defective. The finned tibial tray – a metal component of Exactech’s knee replacement system that fits into a patient’s tibia – as well as polyethylene components were both alleged to have failed prematurely at a higher-than-acceptable rate.
Products must be both medically reasonable and necessary for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to reimburse medical device companies. According to the Government, the two Exactech components were not reasonable and necessary for use during total-knee replacement surgeries on Medicare, Medicaid, and VA beneficiaries because of the high premature failure rates.
In the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ’s) press release, U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Kelly Hayes articulated this standard, noting that “when a manufacturer learns that its device is defective, it must promptly and transparently address the problem.”
In a 1920 U.S. Supreme Court case, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. famously said, “men must turn square corners when they deal with the Government,” a phrase that has become known as the “square corners” doctrine. It means that when a person or entity deals with the government, they must adhere to all rules precisely and without shortcuts.
Judging by the allegations levelled in the two qui tam complaints and the subsequent settlement, Exactech appears to have been less than exact in how it turned its corners with the Government in this case.
Modern Healthcare reported that UnitedHealthcare (UHC) says that starting Jan. 1, it will only pay for remote patient monitoring for heart failure or hypertensive disorders
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article was originally published Monday, Dec. 8 by RACmonitor as a special bulletin. Many people are still seething mad about Aetna’s devious
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
