Few topics crop up in our articles more often than the Two-Midnight Rule. While it is frequently discussed and debated, I would posit that few regulations are easier to explain.
For both patients with traditional Medicare and those who elected to be in a Medicare Advantage (MA) plan, if two things are true, the patient should be admitted as an inpatient.
First, the patient must need hospital care. In other words, if the patient could be at home, or in a skilled nursing facility (SNF), or some other setting without it increasing their health risk, they should not be admitted to the hospital as an inpatient. Please note that I did not say that they necessarily require “inpatient” care. As Ron Hirsch, M.D. has explained so well for many years, there’s no such thing as “inpatient care.”
There is hospital care and non-hospital care. “Inpatient” and “outpatient” describe a person’s status, not their medical needs. If the patient doesn’t need to be in the hospital, no insurance company should be billing for the services they are receiving. But if the patient needs to be in the hospital, this test is satisfied.
The second factor is that when making this decision, the physician must expect the patient to need hospital care for at least two midnights. The biggest challenge here is determining what an “expectation” is. How much certainty should the physician have? Is it “more probable than not,” such that the doctor thinks there’s a 51-percent chance the patient will be in for two midnights, meaning they have an “expectation?”
The regulation offers no insight, nor does the Manual. The Oxford English Dictionary describes an expectation as something that is “regard(ed) as likely to happen,” while Merriam says that an expectation is “to think that something will probably will be, or happen.” That doesn’t really offer much help.
As a weather nut, I know that the National Weather Service defines “likely” as a 60- or 70-percent chance. But the Weather Service has no authority over Medicare. So, how likely must it be? I’d argue that’s the biggest uncertainty in the Two-Midnight Rule. And I would say 51 percent seems defensible to me.
If the patient needs hospital care, and is expected to for two midnights, they should be admitted. The act of admission requires two things. There must be an order, though the order need not be in writing.
Writing is wise, but an oral order is technically sufficient. Second, that order must come from a person with admitting privileges. But neither of those factors determine who gets admitted; they address the question of whether the admission meets Medicare requirements.
There’s one final point I want to emphasize. I’ve seen some situations where consultants or even Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) have suggested that some three-day stays may still be outpatient. For Medicare or MA, that is categorically false. After the patient has crossed that second midnight, the only time that a patient would not be an inpatient was if they don’t need to be in the hospital at all. In that case, they are not qualified to be a hospital outpatient, either. They should be someplace else.
Let me say that more definitively: there should never, ever, ever, ever be a Medicare or MA patient in the hospital for more than two midnights without them being admitted as an inpatient, unless their stay is considered medically unnecessary.
Today, I am going back to basics by turning a spotlight on the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs). The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)
I do not usually report on what other media are reporting (with the exception of Nina Youngstrom’s reports on Medicare compliance!), but John Oliver’s story
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
RACmonitor is proud to welcome back Dr. Ronald Hirsch, one of his most requested webcasts. In this highly anticipated session, Dr. Hirsch will break down the complex Two Midnight Rule Medicare regulations, translating them into clear, actionable guidance. He’ll walk you through the basics of the rule, offer expert interpretation, and apply the rule to real-world clinical scenarios—so you leave with greater clarity, confidence, and the tools to ensure compliance.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
