At the start of a new year, it is traditional to forecast what will happen in the next – but I’ve been around long enough to know that my tornado and northern lights forecasting are both better than my regulatory predictions. And since I only see storms and northern lights on a fraction of my outings, it would be unwise to rely on my regulatory forecasts.
So, rather than wasting your time with guesses, I will do something that sounds worse but is more useful: reporting what I did over the publication’s winter break. I had a meeting with a client that was both a ton of fun and absolutely fascinating. I was invited to join their compliance retreat, as my client tried to establish consistency within its compliance team with respect to approaching refunds to governmental and private insurers.
What do you do when you have a small problem that merits a refund, but the work perfectly quantifying the amount will cost more than the amount at issue? How far back should your refunds go? If you find a practice that is inconsistent with an LCD, do you refund?
If you are doing some sort of sample to determine a compliance problem, at what error rate do you decide to project to a larger universe, rather than simply refunding on the items you reviewed? Are you going to refund to private insurance companies when you find an issue with Medicare patients? Will you handle Medicare Advantage the same way you handle Medicare or the same way you handle private insurance companies?
The reason I’m rattling all these questions off, rather than answering them, is that we spent over an hour working through these and other scenarios, and I just have a few minutes to write.
I really enjoyed the exercise, and client reported that its team found it very useful. Every topic provided at least some discussion and dissent, meaning that absent the retreat, different people might have handled the same situation differently. While I strongly believe that in many cases, foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of a small mind when it comes to compliance issues, there are definitely benefits to taking an intellectually consistent approach within your organization.
One of the best examples of this is the problem created if you opt to refund in one situation because the amount at issue is small, and then you have an analytically similar issue with a large dollar amount. If you choose not to refund on the bigger amount, you’ve given powerful ammunition for someone to challenge the decision to keep the money.
Instead of making a forecast for the coming year, I’m going to offer some advice. Set up a retreat with your compliance team. Include your inside and outside counsel. Talk about the hardest refund issues you’ve confronted over the last few years, and how you’ve approached them.
Work hard to build a consensus, and make sure that consensus allows you to keep reimbursement for services you’ve provided, whenever that’s legally possible. This retreat was about as much fun as I can have at work, and I certainly hope I get invited to many more of them during 2024.
Federal officials announced this week that one of the nation’s largest health insurers has agreed to pay $117.7 million to resolve fraud allegations. The False
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’s) $50 billion Rural Health Transformation Program was designed by the Trump Administration to reshape healthcare delivery in
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
