Seoul Medical Group and Related Parties Pay $62 Million to Settle False Claims Act Case

Seoul Medical Group and Related Parties Pay $62 Million to Settle False Claims Act Case

On March 26, the following four entities agreed to pay roughly $62 million to settle a whistleblower’s allegations under the False Claims Act:

  • Seoul Medical Group (SMG), a medical practice that has operated in various states, including California, and is headquartered in Los Angeles’ Koreatown neighborhood, and its subsidiary, Advanced Medical Management, which provides healthcare operational services, who combined paid over $58 million of the $62 million settlement;
  • The companies’ former president and majority owner, Dr. Min Young Cha, who agreed to pay about $1.8 million; and
  • Renaissance Imaging Medical Associates, a radiology group that worked with SMG, which agreed to pay about $2.4 million.

The allegations resolved in the case are that during the six-year period from 2015 to 2021, SMG submitted false diagnosis codes for two severe spinal conditions, spinal enthesopathy and sacroiliitis, which are notably expensive to treat and have a high risk score, in order to increase payments under Medicare Part C.

Because SMG treated many Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries, these allegedly false codes caused higher outlays from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), since, in Medicare Advantage, the government payments are in part determined by the health status of the population, and patients with severe conditions like spinal enthesopathy and sacroiliitis garner a larger risk-adjusted payment from the MA Plan for those beneficiaries.

A portion of the MA plans’ payments, including the allegedly inflated capitated payments from the upcoded spinal conditions, were passed on to SMG under a capitation arrangement between SMG and the MA plans, whereby SMG shared in a portion of the health plans’ risk and upside.

According to the complaint, in 2017, Healthnet, one of the MA plans SMG contracted with, alerted SMG that it believed some of its documented conditions were in fact false, questioning SMG about its dramatically increasing risk scores arising from its previous year’s submission of hierarchical condition categories (HCCs).

Soon thereafter, SMG allegedly contracted with Renaissance Imaging Medical Associates to create radiology reports that appeared to support the spinal enthesopathy diagnosis.

The whistleblower, Paul Pew, was a very highly placed insider, having served as the Executive Vice President and CFO of Advanced Medical Management for 10 years until his termination in 2019, allegedly in retaliation for raising complaints internally about SMG’s practice of generating and submitting false diagnosis codes that were unsupported by the patients’ medical charts.

For his role in launching this case with his qui tam whistleblower complaint, Mr. Pew will receive a share of the proceeds in an amount that is yet to be determined.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Mary Inman, Esq.

Mary Inman is a partner and co-founder of Whistleblower Partners LLP, a law firm dedicated to representing whistleblowers under the various U.S. whistleblower reward programs. Mary and her colleagues have pioneered a series of successful whistleblower cases against prominent health insurers, hospitals, provider groups, and vendors under the False Claims Act alleging manipulation of the risk scores of Medicare Advantage patients. Mary is a recognized expert and frequent author, commentator, and speaker on frauds in the healthcare industry, particularly those exposed by whistleblowers. Mary is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and a popular panelist on Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24