The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) has posted a report titled Additional Oversight of Remote Patient Monitoring in Medicare is Needed.
You know what that means?
Primary care physicians and cardiologists beware!
Since use of telehealth and remote patient monitoring has skyrocketed since COVID, the OIG has determined that telehealth, like behavioral health or home health, is a less tangible service – rather than, for example, orthopedist services, where X-rays display broken bones. Therefore, since patient monitoring, behavioral healthcare, and home health are more subjective, they tend to get ranked as high-risk in the eyes of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). The most common conditions for which Medicare enrollees receive remote monitoring services were hypertension (55 percent) and diabetes (16 percent). Hence, primary care (59 percent) and cardiology (11 percent) providers are targets in the firing zone.
According to the OIG report, approximately 43 percent of the Medicare enrollees analyzed in the report who received remote patient monitoring services were not provided at least one of the three following components of these services:
What OIG is alleging is that providers billed for the aforementioned codes, but did not render the services. In my opinion, OIG’s report is a bit more focused than usual. Oh, and I guess I should include durable medical equipment (DME) companies because of 99454, supply of a connected device.
Going back to the codes at issue: there is no requirement to render all three components to all consumers. I think that is important to remember, as a possible denial reason could be that an auditor thinks all three are required. It would be illustrative of the types of denials we have seen in the past. CMS and OIG’s report are clear. The agencies smell blood.
This report is just the latest indicator signifying that remote patient monitoring is an area of increased government interest. In addition, Medicare use of remote patient monitoring remains an open OIG Work Plan item, and CMS recently provided additional clarification regarding Medicare restrictions related to remote physiologic monitoring and remote therapeutic monitoring services in the 2024 Physician Fee Schedule Final Rule.
Among other things, the Final Rule reaffirmed that such remote monitoring services should only be furnished to an established patient, confirmed a return to pre-pandemic data collection and transmission requirements of at least 16 days in a 30-day period, and provided additional detail about when remote monitoring may and may not be billed in conjunction with other services.
Thus, Medicare providers that bill for any component of the remote patient monitoring services should expect and prepare for heightened government scrutiny regarding their Medicare billing practices, which may include increased and targeted audit activity.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
While attending the Florida Compliance and Privacy Consortium meeting, I was asked an excellent question. What if a patient who is ready for discharge from
We have been talking a lot lately about the malfeasance of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, and deservedly so. But malfeasance can be a two-way street.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
