One Claim with Multiple Denials Calls for Smart Defense

By Denise Wilson MS, RN, RRT
September 27, 2017

CERT claim review highlights need for strategic approach.

How do you handle your appeals when there is more than one issue being denied? For example, if the payer denies both the medical necessity of the level of care as well as the coding of a procedure, what strategies should you employ to challenge it?

When two issues are being denied, the appeal strategy first of all will depend on whether the denials were issued at the same time. If the denials were issued at the same time (that is, within the same decision letter), then both issues should be appealed in the same appeal letter. This typically requires the collaboration of both a clinician and a coder to develop one cohesive response that addresses both issues.

If the two issues were denied at different times (that is, two separate decision letters were issued with different dates), then each issue should be treated as a separate denial with a separate appeal, even if the appeal time frames overlap. The obvious logic behind this is that the time frames for appeal will be different for each denial, depending on the date the denial was issued. Thus, the appeal for each issue should be filed separately so that time frames can be more easily managed.

Just recently I was reviewing a decision letter from the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) contractor on the issue of a TAVR – that is, a trans-catheter aortic valve replacement, which is currently on the CMS inpatient-only list.

Essentially, the CERT contractor was reviewing the claim for this nine-day hospital stay to ensure it met the criteria for medical necessity, as outlined in the National Coverage Determination for this procedure. The contractor reviewed the documentation to ascertain whether certain elements, such as the required preoperative evaluation by two cardio-thoracic surgeons, were present in the record. Unfortunately, in this case, the required evaluations were not present, and the CERT denied the medical necessity of the procedure, resulting in down-coding of the DRG.

What I found interesting, though, was that the CERT went to great lengths to explain that the inpatient hospital admission for this inpatient-only procedure was in fact reasonable and medically necessary. The reasoning the CERT provided was that this patient’s intraoperative and postoperative complications included a need for a blood transfusion, BiPAP, monitoring of thrombocytopenia, and treatment of increased blood pressures.

So let’s imagine for a moment that the CERT contractor reviewed the medical necessity of a procedure that was not on the inpatient-only list. And let’s imagine that in this case, the patient experienced complications that warranted an inpatient admission, following the two-midnight rule. And let’s further imagine that in its decision letter following its review, the contractor issued a statement on the medical necessity of the inpatient admission, deeming it to be reasonable and medically necessary.

I would strongly encourage a provider to flag a case such as this as having been reviewed and approved for the appropriate level of care, even if that was not the original purpose of the review. Should this case ever be requested by any other CMS auditor for level-of-care review, I would certainly argue that it is no longer eligible.

And finally, I would be certain to reiterate in my appeal of the medical necessity of the procedure that the CERT contractor had deemed the inpatient admission to be reasonable and medically necessary.

The CERT denial letter and your appeal letter will serve as proof that this case was already reviewed for level of care, should any other CMS auditor attempt to pull it for review.

TAGS: Appeal, Claims, CMS, Denials

Denise Wilson MS, RN, RRT

Denise Wilson is a Senior Vice President at AppealMasters and serves as President of the Association for Healthcare Denial and Appeal Management (AHDAM). She also provides ongoing education and expert knowledge to internal and external clients on commercial and Medicare denials and appeals via web-based seminars, onsite training, written materials and one-on-one consultations. She created and trained an appeal-writing team, which has grown to a staff of more than 70 nurses, physicians and coders.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.

September 19, 2023

CMS 2024 Rule Update: Unveiling Essential Insights for Case Management and Utilization Review Preparedness

A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.

August 24, 2023

Decoding Social Admissions: Billing, Notifications, & Discharge Rights Demystified

Gain clarity on billing, patient notifications, and discharge appeal rights in social admissions. Join our webcast for essential insights and strategies to navigate this complex landscape, ensuring financial stability and optimal patient care.

July 27, 2023

Navigating Outpatient in a Hospital Bed: Billing and Compliance Solutions

Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides tried-and-true strategies and insight into outpatient in hospital bed stays including determining the applicable definition, who uses it, and when and how to bill for this circumstance, solidified with concrete case examples and expert insight.

June 8, 2023

Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Explore comprehensive guidelines and best practices for secondary diagnosis coding in our illuminating webcast. Delve into the intricacies of accurately assigning secondary diagnosis codes to ensure precise medical documentation. Learn how to navigate complex scenarios and adhere to coding regulations while enhancing coding proficiency. Our expert-led webcast covers essential insights, including documentation requirements, sequencing strategies, and industry updates. Elevate your coding skills and stay current with the latest coding advancements so you can determine the correct DRG assignment to optimize reimbursement, support medical decision-making, and maintain compliance.

September 20, 2023

Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

Enhance your inpatient coding precision and revenue with Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing. Join our expert-led webcast to conquer the challenges of principal diagnosis selection and sequencing. We’ll decode the intricacies of ICD-10-CM guidelines, equipping you with a clear grasp of the rules and the official UHDDS principal diagnosis definition. Uncover the crucial role of coding conventions, master the sequencing of related conditions, and confidently tackle cases with equally valid principal diagnoses.

September 14, 2023

2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY24 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, plus insights, analysis and answers to questions from the country’s most respected subject matter experts.

2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2024 IPPS Summit will feature a review of FY24 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by senior healthcare consultant Laurie Johnson, with bonus insights and analysis from two acclaimed subject matter experts

August 17, 2023

One Claim with Multiple Denials Calls for Smart Defense

Denise Wilson MS, RN, RRT

Related Stories

CMS Tells Livanta to Reassess Short-Stay Memo

Why it’s Important to Understand Medicare and Medicaid Exclusions and Preclusions

Leave a Reply

Featured Webcasts

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

CMS 2024 Rule Update: Unveiling Essential Insights for Case Management and Utilization Review Preparedness

Decoding Social Admissions: Billing, Notifications, & Discharge Rights Demystified

Navigating Outpatient in a Hospital Bed: Billing and Compliance Solutions

Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

Trending News

Beware of Large Egos

How Artificial Intelligence is Leveling the Playing Field for E&M Coding

Discrimination Against the Disabled? Not on CMS’s Watch

Understanding the Threat of Threats

Stay Connected

News

Account

Info