For those of you who have used ChatGPT to, say, organize an email or a presentation, you know that the artificial intelligence (AI) is very good at outlining and summarizing certain subjects, especially at a very high level.
But you can’t depend on AI to say anything new about a given subject. Not yet, anyway. This is actually a good thing for people like me, who make my living writing and talking about stuff.
These were my thoughts as I read the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) first annual report on the No Surprises Act (NSA) and its effect and impact on the healthcare industry. The long-awaited report was released late last week, but it simply summarizes a list of possible impacts the NSA may have (but does not present any new information).
The document promises that in the future, these annual reports will include how the NSA may – or may not – impact out-of-network pricing, and any movement by providers between out-of-network and in-network.
The report also promises that in future reports, an analysis will be done on whether (or not) the No Surprises Act has impacted in-network negotiations and overall medical costs, and whether (or not) the NSA has created more or less consolidation in the marketplace.
In essence, the 45-page annual report is what a journalism teacher of mine once referred to as “clearing one’s throat:” spending a lot of time introducing what you plan to talk about, but then … not actually talking about anything. In other words, an AI could have (and may have!) written it.
Also in NSA news, last week the government presented its initial arguments on an appeal of a decision made in a Texas federal court last winter regarding the No Surprises Act. As you may remember, the Texas Medical Association won a number of decisions against HHS on its No Surprises Act Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. The Association’s basic argument in all these cases is that providers are disadvantaged by the process.
With its appeal, HHS is pushing back. One argument that they do not make in their appeal is that providers have won 70 percent of the cases in the IDR process so far against health plans, according to an April 2023 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) report, so the scoreboard itself is not showing any disadvantage to providers, to this point.
Moving on, the administration and Congress continue to fidget with the hospital transparency rules, in terms of requirements and enforcement.
A number of bills have been passed on a bipartisan basis by House Committees – including the PATIENT Act out of the Energy and Commerce Committee – that would codify the provider transparency rules and ramp up enforcement.
Now, these bills haven’t made it to the House floor yet, and the Senate has not seen them at all, but there’s some chance that they may end up in an end-of-year omnibus package.
Last week CMS also published the proposed Medicare Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) rule. In that rule, CMS proposed an outpatient payment update of 2.8 percent.
In the rule, the government also proposed several changes to the hospital price transparency requirements, including requiring that hospitals use one of several standardized formats for the Machine-Readable Files, or MRFs, and some more amping up of enforcement.
Now, I’ll be a good AI here and summarize: for both the No Surprises Act and the Transparency Rules, stay tuned. Between litigation, new legislation, and new regulations, the requirements and policies of these two sets of laws will continue to change.
Programming note: Listen to legislative updates every Monday on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck.
There is a lot of talk lately about the need to follow orders given by a member of law enforcement. I would like to explore
Remember the backlog at the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) level of review? Where providers routinely waited years for hearings, while recoupments proceeded and cash flow
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
