Understanding the Requirement of Review

Understanding the Requirement of Review

Sometimes, life is predictable.

Eclipses are a great example. (You should plan on seeing the next total solar eclipse, on April 8, 2024! It’ll be visible across a large swath of the country, from Texas to Maine.) It’s the stuff of legend, how people once used the ability to predict an eclipse to appear magical.

But sometimes, life gets complicated, and the thing that we predicted would happen, doesn’t. In the compliance world, failed predictions can generate significant compliance headaches. I have stated my thoughts about the disadvantages of having detailed compliance policies many times. It is quite common for policies created with the intention of helping an organization stay out of trouble to wind up doing exactly the opposite. There may be no better illustration of this point than policies regarding internal audits. 

First, I don’t like the term “audit.”

I know that the sentencing guidelines, the source document for compliance plans, include “auditing and monitoring” as one of the seven key elements in an effective compliance plan. But I learned a lesson 30 years ago. My client had a policy to perform internal evaluation and management (E&M) audits. The government asserted that every time an audit found a physician’s documentation to be deficient, there was an obligation to issue a refund. The fact that my client called these reviews “audits” appeared to add a level of scientific precision to the process that simply didn’t exist.

But as regular readers here know, “if it isn’t written, it wasn’t done” isn’t the law; it’s an expression and a misleading one at that.

While Medicaid in many states has an explicit documentation requirement, Medicare only requires documentation for very limited services, such as teaching physician services and anesthesia services. The government used my client’s “internal audit” process against it. While we ultimately prevailed in the case, it took a while.

Most organizations with a compliance policy have one that calls for internal audits. Let us assume that the policy wisely uses the term “review,” rather than “audit.” There’s still another big problem the policy can cause. Many policies include specific details about the frequency of the reviews. Let’s say your policy calls for a certain number of charts to be reviewed annually or quarterly. Then, along comes some unexpected event – perhaps a global pandemic or a workforce shortage. Suddenly, what was happening quarterly or annually is happening semi-annually, or every few years.

Is your organization violating any laws if it conducts reviews slightly less frequently? Absolutely not. But can someone suggest that you aren’t taking compliance seriously because you are failing to follow your very own policy? Absolutely.

To be clear, I am not suggesting you shouldn’t perform reviews.

I am saying that doing reviews without a written policy is at least as good as doing reviews with one, but failing to do reviews is worse if you have a policy than if you don’t. The bottom line is that having the policy doesn’t offer any material help, but it can most certainly hurt. 

When something can only make things worse, it seems foolish to do it. Therefore, I would recommend that you conduct regular reviews, but without having a formal policy purporting to “require” them.

Programming note: Listen to healthcare attorney David Glaser’s “Risky Business” segment every Monday on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Frank Cohen shows you how to leverage the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program (CERT) to create your own internal coding and billing risk assessment plan, including granular identification of risk areas and prioritizing audit tasks and functions resulting in decreased claim submission errors, reduced risk of audit-related damages, and a smoother, more efficient reimbursement process from Medicare.

April 9, 2024
2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.

March 21, 2024
Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.

February 22, 2024
Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Join healthcare attorney David Glaser, as he debunks refund myths, clarifies compliance essentials, and empowers healthcare professionals to safeguard facility finances. Uncover the secrets behind when to refund and why it matters. Don’t miss this crucial insight into strategic refund management.

February 29, 2024
2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment

2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment

Dive deep into the world of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) coding with our comprehensive webcast. Explore the latest OPPS codes for 2024, understand SDoH assessments, and discover effective strategies for integrating coding seamlessly into healthcare practices. Gain invaluable insights and practical knowledge to navigate the complexities of SDoH coding confidently. Join us to unlock the potential of coding in promoting holistic patient care.

May 22, 2024
2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDIs on important information in each of the AHA’s 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.

April 15, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

Happy World Health Day! Our exclusive webcast, ‘2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment,’  is just $99 for a limited time! Use code WorldHealth24 at checkout.

SPRING INTO SAVINGS! Get 21% OFF during our exclusive two-day sale starting 3/21/2024. Use SPRING24 at checkout to claim this offer. Click here to learn more →