Plaintiffs are the American Hospital Association and three other regional hospitals and healthcare systems.
Providers with Medicare appeals pending may have their claims resolved sooner than expected. On Nov. 1, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Boasberg ruled that the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) must eliminate the Medicare appeals backlog by the end of fiscal year 2022.
Currently, there is a backlog of 426,594 appeals. Judge Boasberg’s ruling imposes a timetable for reducing the backlog of appeals. Specifically, HHS must clear 19 percent of the appeals by the end of fiscal year 2019; 49 percent of the appeals by the end of fiscal year 2020; 75 percent by the end of fiscal year 2021; and eliminate the backlog entirely by the end of 2022. Beginning on Dec. 31, 2018, HHS must file quarterly status reports on its progress.
This long-awaited ruling comes years after the American Hospital Association (AHA) filed the lawsuit alleging that HHS was violating federal law by failing to process appeals according to statutorily-mandated timeframes. Federal regulations require appeals at the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing level to be completed within 90 days following the date the request for hearing is received by the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA).[1] The current average processing time, however, for a case pending at the ALJ level is more than three years.[2]
The Complaint, which was filed by the AHA in 2014, was initially dismissed by the District Court for lack of jurisdiction. In February 2016, the D.C. Circuit Court reversed the District Court’s dismissal and ordered the District Court to issue a decision on the merits. In December 2016, the District Court entered summary judgment in favor of the AHA and ordered HHS to comply with a timetable to eliminate the backlog of appeals by 2020. In August 2017, the D.C. Circuit again reversed the District Court and ordered the District Court to evaluate HHS’ claim that compliance with the timetable would be impossible.
In his recent decision, Judge Boasberg found that he could “easily conclude that it would be possible” for HHS to reduce and then eliminate the backlog as a result of increased funding from Congress to HHS.[3] In March 2018, Congress appropriated $182.3 million for the purpose of addressing the backlog and, by HHS’ own projections, the increased adjudication capacity as a result of the additional funding would allow HHS to “eliminate the backlog entirely in FY 2022.”[4] According to Judge Boasberg’s decision, HHS can request a modification of the order if Congress reduces HHS’ funding such that it would be impossible to comply with the timetable for reducing appeals.
Aside from the issue of whether it was possible for HHS to comply with the court-ordered timetable, Judge Boasberg found that the equities weighed in favor of the AHA as the lengthy Medicare appeals process impacts “hospitals’ willingness and ability” to provide care to patients.[5]
Judge Boasberg denied the AHA’s requests to reduce the interest charged on appeals, allow providers to rebill their claims for six months following issuance of the Court’s order, and require that HHS maintain its current settlement programs. Judge Boasberg concluded that “[w]here the agency is held to a set of deadlines, it is unnecessary – and unwise – to further specify the steps it must take.”[6]
If Judge Boasberg’s decision stands, it will significantly change the current Medicare audit timeline and the way that Medicare appeals are handled by providers and attorneys.
Program Note:
Listen to healthcare attorney Andrew Wachler report this story live on Monitor Monday, Nov. 12, 10-10:30 a.m.
[1] 42 C.F.R. 405.1016(a).
[2] Average Processing Time By Fiscal Year, https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/omha/about/current-workload/index.html
[3] AHA v. Azar, 2018 U.S. Dist. Lexis 186853, *8 (D.D.C. 2018) (emphasis in original).
[4] Id. at *7 (emphasis in original).
[5] Id. at *11.
[6] Id. at *13.
Welcome back everybody after the holidays. As a CPA, I have always been uncomfortable when the word “Audit” is used to describe activity since the term
I am going to start 2026 by doing something I rarely do, and that is compliment an insurance company, and United Healthcare at that. As you
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
