New RAC targets are being proposed by CMS as the agency seeks to consolidate Medicare audits.
You have to stay on your toes when you deal with Recovery Audit Contractors (RAC) audits— not to mention all the other types of regulatory audits that health care providers undergo.
This article investigates a possible evolutionary shift in Medicare regulatory audits, as well as discusses the breaking news of newly targeted health care services in RAC audits across the country (just proposed this month, May 2018).
Medicare Audit Evolution
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) recently announced a $25 billion quality initiative and consolidation for Medicare audits. The model of regulatory audits may be shifting—or trying to shift. Introducing the “Network of Quality Improvement and Innovation Contractors” (NQIIC). CMS will award multiple organizations “Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quality” contracts with a 10-year ordering period.
QIOs or QIO-like entities are not new. But the amount of money now dedicated to the program warrants another look. A Quality Improvement Organization (QIO) is a group of health quality experts, clinicians, and consumers organized to improve the quality of care delivered to people with Medicare. Juxtapose the auditors for RAC audits, who are, usually, not clinicians. For example, an RN may audit a hospital’s billings. Also, the RAC audits are typically conducted by one or two auditors who make the determinations rather than a group of people with different backgrounds. I am not saying one is better than the other; I am simply explaining the variances, although it seems CMS and hospitals prefer QIO claims audits over RAC claims audits, because QIO audits are often overseen by clinicians instead of non-clinical auditors.
CMS plans to consolidate various Medicare quality improvement programs, including Quality Improvement Networks and Organizations (QIN-QIOs), End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Networks, and Hospital Improvement Innovation Networks (HIINs) into a single contract worth up to $25 billion.
Medicare RAC Hot Topics
The following services have been newly proposed as RAC targets:
Facet Injections – Outpatient Hospital or Ambulatory Surgical Centers: All states.
Facet Joint Injections are reasonable and necessary for chronic pain (persistent pain for three months or greater) suspected to originate from the facet joint. Medical documentation will be reviewed to determine that services were medically reasonable and necessary.
MSU Under and Overpayments: – All states.
Multiple surgery units (MSUs) are separate procedures performed on the same patient at the same operative session or on the same day for which separate payment may be allowed. Payment of the procedure with the highest value is based on 100 percent of the fee schedule amount. Subsequent procedures are paid based on 50 percent of the fee schedule amount. Underpayments occur when claim lines are improperly reduced due to incorrect primary procedure ranking determinations and when modifier 51 is submitted for non-reducible procedures. Overpayment occurs when secondary/subsequent procedure claim lines are not properly reduced due to incorrect primary procedure ranking determinations.
Unbundling of Critical Care: – All states.
Certain services, when performed on the day a physician bills for critical care, are included in the critical care service and should not be reported separately.
Skilled Nursing Facility Consolidated Billing: – All states.
Payment for the majority of skilled nursing facility (SNF) services provided to beneficiaries in a Medicare-covered Part A SNF stay are included in a bundled prospective payment. Entities that provide these services should look to the SNF for payment. Under the consolidated billing requirement, the SNF must submit all Medicare claims.
Good luck and keep on those toes!
EDITOR’S NOTE: The author of this article used AI-assisted tools in its composition, but all content, analysis, and conclusions were based on the author’s professional
While the coverage of telehealth is definitely a good thing, it has caused needless confusion. I would like to address a little of that today.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
