Increasing AHRQ PSI-90 Rates Requires Facility Attention

CDI people, processes, and technologies must adapt to changes if a facility’s outcomes are not to be unintentionally misrepresented.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) assesses inpatient care quality in part through its analysis of inpatient claims employing the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Patient Safety Indicators (PSIs).

Pertinent calculations include the following:

  • PSI 04: Death Rate among Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications – affecting a facility’s reputation as reported on the CMS Hospital Compare website
  • PSI 90: Patient Safety and Adverse Events Composite – affecting CMS’s Inpatient Quality Reporting score contributing to a potential 1-percent traditional Medicare inpatient revenue reduction, and comprising the following PSIs, with varying weighted impacts:
    • PSI 03 Pressure Ulcer Rate
    • PSI 06 Iatrogenic Pneumothorax Rate
    • PSI 08 In-Hospital Fall with Hip Fracture Rate
    • PSI 09 Postoperative Hemorrhage or Hematoma Rate
    • PSI 10 Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury Requiring Dialysis Rate
    • PSI 11 Postoperative Respiratory Failure Rate
    • PSI 12 Perioperative Pulmonary Embolism (PE) or Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) Rate
    • PSI 13 Postoperative Sepsis Rate
    • PSI 14 Postoperative Wound Dehiscence Rate
    • PSI 15 Abdominopelvic Accidental Puncture or Laceration Rate

PSIs also affect many reputational websites, such as:

Consequently, inpatient hospitals must diligently understand how AHRQ calculates each PSI and partners with their medical and coding staffs to ensure that provider documentation correctly reflects all PSI-sensitive conditions, inclusions, exclusions, and risk adjustments. Such facilities also must ensure that all inpatient coding departments compliantly apply official ICD-10-CM conventions, guidelines, and advice to this documentation, in order to report PSI-sensitive codes within the first 25 slots, as allowed by version 5010 of the X12 standards for HIPAA transactions. 

AHRQ published its updated criteria for 2021 fiscal-year (FY) PSI calculations in July 2021 – which, for certain PSIs, significantly increases their frequency, impact, or risk adjustment, summarized at https://www.qualityindicators.ahrq.gov/Modules/Log_Coding_Updates_PSI_v2021.aspx. Those of immediate interest include:

  • COVID-19 – AHRQ amended its software so that COVID-19 cases (e.g., ICD-10-CM code U071) are excluded by default, and if one does include COVID-19 cases, there will be no risk adjustment, smoothed rates, or composites for hospital indicators. They stated that “the recommended and default choice is to exclude COVID-19 discharges,” which should be welcome news for hospitals that experience COVID-19-related hypercoagulopathies resulting in pulmonary emboli affecting PSI 12 (and surgical inpatients with pneumonia as a secondary diagnosis who die during their hospital stay, affecting PSI 04).
  • PSI 04: Death Rate among Surgical Inpatients with Serious Treatable Complications – AHRQ revised the order of the PSI 04 strata hierarchy to shock, sepsis, pneumonia, GI hemorrhage, and DVT/PE, swapping the positions of GI hemorrhage and DVT/PE (whereby DVT/PE is last), and added ICD-10-CM code Z66, Do Not Resuscitate, as a significant risk adjuster, weighted even higher than metastatic cancer. AHRQ worded it as “lifesaving intervention goes against patient’s documented preference;” thus, while not explicitly stated, it appears that Z66 does not have to be present on admission to qualify.
  • PSI 08: In-Hospital Fall with Hip Fracture Rate – Removed the requirement that a patient who suffered a hip fracture not present on admission undergo a hip procedure to qualify for the PSI. They also moved most of the exclusions for seizure disorders, syncope, stroke, coma, cardiac arrest, poisonings, trauma, delirium, anoxic brain injury, metastatic cancer, lymphoma, and other bone diseases, leaving only peri-prosthetic hip fracture as an exclusion, significantly increasing PSI 08’s frequency in facilities where post-admission hip fractures occur. The only way to inhibit this increase in PSI 08 is to prevent these in-hospital fractures from occurring in the first place.
  • PSI 11: Postoperative Respiratory Failure Rate – Removed the exclusion for Major Diagnostic Category 5, Diseases & Disorders of the Circulatory System, which will likely increase the frequency of this PSI, since many physicians document “postoperative respiratory failure” in intubated or ventilated patients after cardiothoracic surgery. In addition, AHRQ increased PSI 11’s weight in the PSI-90 composite from 16.8 to 24.0 percent, increasing its impact. Careful attention to ICD-10-CM coding conventions, guidelines, and advice and documentation requirements for ICD-10-CM codes J95.82- (a PSI 11 trigger), J96-, J95.1, and J95.2 (all three of which are not PSI 11 triggers) by coding and CDI teams in all surgical inpatients thus increases in importance.
  • PSI 14: Postoperative Wound Dehiscence Rate – Removed the exclusion for AHRQ’s definition of the immunocompromised state, such as with end-stage renal disease, severe malnutrition, and HIV disease.
  • PSI 15: Abdominopelvic Accidental Puncture or Laceration Rate – While not directly mentioned by AHRQ, Coding Clinic’s advice in its edition published for the second quarter of 2021, requiring the reporting of an accidental laceration complication code after a serosal tear resulting in an unplanned bowel excision, will likely increase this PSI rate.
  • Totally Revised 2021 AHRQ Elixhauser Risk Model Implementation – AHRQ uses the Elixhauser risk model, available at https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/toolssoftware/comorbidityicd10/comorbidity_icd10.jsp, to risk-adjust the likelihood that a PSI will or will not occur. In 2021, AHRQ amended this model by removing the highly weighted electrolyte disturbance cohort and requiring certain “semi-chronic” conditions to be present on admission to qualify, such as heart failure, drug-induced bleeding disorders, strokes, stroke consequences, pulmonary hypertension, peptic ulcer disease with bleeding, and malnutrition.

Unlike HCCs or DRGs, the Elixhauser risk model ignores the principal diagnosis in its risk calculation. Rigorously developed preoperative assessment infrastructure and workflows implemented by properly trained assessors are essential to capturing Elixhauser comorbidities and other factors affecting AHRQ PSI (and other methodology) risk adjustment.

Facilities interested in how they are currently performing with PSIs may view their and their competitors’ data at https://data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/ynj2-r877. Analytics groups, such as CDIMDtracker.com, IBM Watson, internal data analytics teams, and others can regroup current data sets using the FY 2020 and FY 2021 methodologies to determine what impact AHRQ’s new changes will have on a hospital’s performance.

CDI people, processes, technologies, and efforts must adapt to these significant changes if a facility’s outcomes are not to be unintentionally misrepresented.

Programming Note: Listen to Dr. Kennedy report this story live today during Talk Ten Tuesdays at 10 Eastern.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Related Stories

Understanding the Pitfalls of Policy

Policies have the potential to be quite a double-edged sword. Generally speaking, managers love policies, and I think there are several reasons for this. Perhaps the

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24