The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Final Rule on risk adjustment data validation (RADV) audits of Medicare Advantage organizations (MAOs) on Jan.0 30, 2023. Humana then sued the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) on Sept. 1, arguing that the RADV audits, as newly revised, are not accurate and should not be used.
The RADV program is CMS’s mechanism for validating the accuracy of diagnoses submitted by MAOs for risk adjustment. Arguably, the Medicare Advantage companies receive higher reimbursement rates for more severe diagnoses. The goal of RADV audits is to identify and correct any discrepancies or inaccuracies in the diagnoses reported by MAOs. Inaccurate coding can result in overpayments or underpayments.
A quick summary of the 2023 Rule:
CMS will extrapolate. This Final Rule allows CMS to audit a sample of an MAO’s diagnoses reported for risk adjustment purposes (from 2018 and later) and then use the audit findings to calculate an extrapolated improper payment amount for the MAO’s contract.
This extrapolation technique is controversial for a number of reasons, including whether CMS has the authority to use it in the manner proposed in the Final Rule, and whether it is an actuarially sound method of auditing.
CMS will not apply a fee-for-service (FFS) adjuster in RADV audits to account for any effect of erroneous diagnosis codes in the data from Medicare Parts A and B, which are used to calibrate the MA risk adjustment model.
MAOs will be required to remit improper payments identified during RADV audits in a manner specified by CMS.
Humana’s lawsuit also asks the court to vacate the Final Rule and enjoin CMS from applying it in any audits of the plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs allege that the MA program is based on a foundational bargain that is being threatened by the Final Rule. This bargain is that MAOs agree to provide their enrolled Medicare beneficiaries at least the same level of benefits that the beneficiaries would receive under traditional FFS Medicare, and in turn, CMS agrees to pay the MAOs the same amount that CMS would expect to pay to cover those beneficiaries if they remained in FFS Medicare. This bargain is codified in the statutory mandate of 42 U.S.C. § 1395w-23(a)(1)(C)(i), “to ensure actuarial equivalence.” According to the complaint, the Final Rule breaks this bargain and undermines the financial stability of the MA program.
At the heart of the plaintiffs’ complaint is an allegation that the Final Rule is actuarially unsound. The plaintiffs allege that the Final Rule would use one set of data when setting risk adjustment payment amounts for MAOs and a different set of data in RADV audits.
This disconnect will result in systemic underpayments to MAOs. More specifically, CMS will use reported diagnosis codes when estimating FFS Medicare costs and will use documented diagnosis codes in RADV audits. The complaint includes the following simplified illustration of why these different documentation standards could result in a payment problem:
If CMS were to divide $1,000 of total spending associated with epilepsy among 100 beneficiaries whose doctors report an epilepsy diagnosis code in FFS Medicare claims data, it would calculate an average incremental cost of $10 per beneficiary. But if the agency instead audited those claims against the underlying medical records for those beneficiaries and found that 50 of the diagnosis codes were not documented in the medical records, it would divide the $1,000 in spending associated with epilepsy across only the remaining 50 diagnosis codes, for an average expected incremental cost of $20 per beneficiary.
In other words, according to the plaintiffs, there is a greater number of Medicare beneficiaries who are reported to have a given condition than are documented to have that condition, and using one standard for risk adjustment payments and another for RADV audits is not an actuarially sound methodology unless an adjustment is made to account for this problem.
Well, I gave you all a break from my criticism of insurance company policies and ploys last week, and I had planned to go for
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued the review copy of the Fee Schedule, Friday, Nov. 1. Usually, the final copy appears about
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
