If you work for a hospital, please read this article closely. If you’re at any other type of healthcare entity, the price transparency rules don’t apply to you, and you can skip this article.
I’ve been working with hospitals that are trying to comply with a state law requiring them to charge uninsured patients the lowest rate the hospital receives from any contracted insurer. I’m hearing a steady stream of complaints from hospitals that they don’t have access to this data.
I can’t comment on the logistics, but I know this: the federal Price Transparency regulations include provisions that seem to require hospitals to PUBLISH that data. These regulations were published in 2019, appearing in 45 CFR, Part 180. The regulation requires hospitals to put on a publicly available website that doesn’t require registration a machine-readable file that includes their “standard charge” for items and services available to the public. That makes the definition of “standard charge” absolutely essential.
Alas, that definition is incredibly confusing, if not affirmatively misleading. Because it uses standard charge, singular, rather than “charges,” plural, one might assume we are talking about a single price that must be listed. That assumption would be absolutely understandable, and yet it is completely wrong. 45 CFR Section 180.20 defines a standard charge as “the regular rate established by the hospital for an item or service provided to a specific group of pain patients.” Once again, the use of the singular suggests a sole price. But the text continues with a list of five different categories of information, all of which are purportedly part of the “standard charge.” This includes all of the following, as defined under this section:
Now, there’s a lot going on here, and it’s incredibly confusing. It means that each hospital must have, for each item or service it offers, a file that lists the highest and lowest reimbursement received for the corresponding code. In a completely incomprehensible twist, the highest and lowest reimbursements can be de-identified (that is, omit the payer name).
The reason that is so confusing is that you must ALSO list every single payment that’s been negotiated with a third-party payer, including the name of the third-party payer. That’s because the list also includes your “payer-specific negotiated charge.” This machine file is supposed to include what you get from Blue Cross, Aetna, United HealthCare, and every other payer.
The fact that so many hospitals said they don’t know the lowest reimbursements they receive as part of the negotiated contract suggests to me that they are out of compliance with the Price Transparency rule. That rule has some teeth.
Hospitals with 550 beds can now be fined up to $5,500 a day for non-compliance. So, if you are in a hospital, check with your CFO to make sure that you’re making available a machine-readable file on your website that includes the items listed above. The rule is confusing, and the data required is controversial, but ignoring the government’s position risks that you will become one of the next hospitals it chooses to penalize to make a point.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has recently taken significant steps to enhance the Medicare Prescription Payment Plan by issuing final guidance and
How safe is the transition from hospital to home if you cannot get the services the person needs at home when they are ready to
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
ICD10monitor has teamed up with renowned CDI expert Dr. Erica Remer to bring you an exclusive webcast on how to recognize sepsis, how to get providers to give documentation that will support sepsis, and how to educate to avert sepsis denials. Register now and become a crucial piece of the solution to standardizing sepsis clinical practice, documentation, and coding at your facility.
Optimize your inpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. Participants will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Join expert Angela Comfort, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P., as she helps you navigate advanced inpatient CDI technologies, regulatory changes, and system interoperability. Angela will provide actionable strategies for integrating AI and predictive analytics into CDI practices, ensuring seamless system interoperability, and maintaining compliance with evolving regulations. Attendees will learn to select and implement advanced EHR systems and CDI software, leverage data analytics to enhance documentation accuracy, and stay audit-ready with the latest compliance updates. Real-world case studies and practical tools will empower you to drive continuous improvement in CDI, improve patient outcomes, and enhance organizational efficiency. Don’t miss this opportunity to advance your CDI practices and stay ahead in this dynamic field.
Join expert Angela Comfort, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, for an insightful webcast on improving inpatient clinical documentation integrity (CDI). Inaccurate documentation can lead to misdiagnosis, improper treatment, and compromised patient safety. High workloads, lack of standardized practices, and outdated EHR systems contribute to these issues, affecting care quality and financial outcomes. Angela will offer practical strategies and tools to enhance accuracy, consistency, and timeliness in documentation. Attendees will learn to use standardized templates, checklists, and advanced EHR systems, while staying compliant with regulations. Improve patient care, ensure accurate billing, and reduce audit risks with actionable insights from this essential webcast.
This webcast, presented by Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, addresses the critical gap in Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) reporting for pediatric populations. While SDoH efforts often focus on adults, this session emphasizes the unique needs of children. Attendees will gain insights into the current state of SDoH, new pediatric Z-codes, and the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration. By understanding and applying pediatric-specific SDoH factors, healthcare professionals can improve data capture, compliance, and care outcomes. This webcast is essential for those looking to enhance their approach to pediatric SDoH reporting and coding.
Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, VP of CDM, for a webcast addressing oncology service coding challenges. Learn to navigate coding for infusions and injections alongside Evaluation and Management (E/M) services, ensuring compliance and accurate reimbursement. Gain insights into documenting E/M services for oncology patients and determining medical necessity. This webcast is essential to optimize coding practices, maintain compliance, and maximize revenue in oncology care.
During this webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch delves into the inpatient admission order process including when to get it, when it becomes effective, its impact on billing and payment, who can write it, how to cancel it, the effects on the beneficiary, and more. You’ll leave with a clear understanding of inpatient orders and guidelines for handling improper orders that you can implement immediately.
Michelle Wieczorek explores challenges, strategies, and best practices to AI implementation and ongoing monitoring in the middle revenue cycle through real-world use cases. She addresses critical issues such as the validation of AI algorithms, the importance of human validation in machine learning, and the delineation of responsibilities between buyers and vendors.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
