Quality reporting will be mandatory in 2024, and then under a payment determination in 2026.
Last week I reported on the social determinants of health (SDoH) requirements for 2023, with many Monitor Mondays listeners being familiar with the Z code discussion. However, based on our listener survey, most respondents had not started working on the quality requirements under the social drivers of the health measure. So today, I would like to discuss how this can be incorporated into your workflow, and what will be needed from an electronic medical record (EMR) and documentation perspective.
To recap, the social drivers of health data submission is voluntary for 2023, which means it is a great time to test out workflows before 2024 – when reporting will be mandatory, and then fall under a payment determination in 2026.
Although there are many options for SDoH questions, and our EMR vendors may be creating their own mechanism, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has specifically provided, cited, and recommended (although not required) the Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool (HRSN).
Each hospital will need to have a mechanism for providing the HRSN questions that apply to the five domains – housing, transportation, food, utilities, and personal safety – to hospital inpatients who are 18 or older. You will need a mechanism that is discrete to pull data that says “yes” or “no” for questions provided to the patient. You would also need a discrete field to mark if the patient declined or was unable to answer. For those individuals who can complete the questions, hospitals will need to capture the positive screen metric by ensuring they have captured responses in all five domains.
Many of these questions live in the EMR and are asked in various ways, either by case managers, physicians, and/or nursing. However, are they in easy, discrete fields for quality reporting? And what is the consistency for asking these questions to our patient populations?
So, if we are considering who sees every inpatient upon admission, these questions fall into two areas: patient registration or the nursing admission assessment.
Once these questions are answered, case management and/or social workers can gladly be routed to follow up with the needed supportive services and elaborate with the patient on any of the responses. Like the ambulatory clinics, the medical assistant collects the information and then the chronic care manager does something with the information obtained.
I would recommend you maintain a consistent process for collection, capitalize on shared fields in the EMR that go across disciplines, and work with your coders so they can easily view this information to capture the Z codes.
For our listener survey, I would like to ask: Are you familiar with the Health-Related Social Needs Screening Tool (HRSN)?
The responses from the Monitor Mondays Listeners Survey may surprise you; they can be viewed here.
Programming Note: Listen to Tiffany Ferguson’s live reporting on the SDoH every Monday on Monitor Mondays at 10 a.m. EST.
I am sure everyone agrees that not only is providing healthcare complicated, but so are all the administrative aspects of healthcare. And as a result,
Let’s start with some updates. We have all been Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER)-free for quite a while now, but I can
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
