The OIG takes on Payers but Trickle Down is Likely

Medlearn Media NPOS Non-patient outcome spending

Two key insurers were recently targeted for HHS OIG scrutiny.

I was all set to dive into the September audits of HumanaChoice and BlueCross Blue Shield (BCBS) of Tennessee conducted by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) when I listened to Dr. Ronald Hirsch during a recent edition of Monitor Mondays when he reported on Cigna Healthspring.

I was also struck by the low error rate. As I dug in, it became clear that all three talked about validating diagnoses, but Cigna was a Hierarchical Condition Category or HCC audit. The outcome remains important for three reasons:

  • First, HCCs are a derivative measure so an errant diagnosis may not be fatal.
  • Second, an error rate this low means that the HHS OIG is unlikely engage in large numbers of this type of audit.
  • Finally, the OIG reiterated that “incorrect diagnosis codes are errors that lead to improper payments, even if the payment is less than it should be.”

The OIG recommended recovering less than $40,000. That means the OIG is recommending recovery of an amount that’s probably less than the OIGs cost of the audit. I’m not clear how that prevents waste.

Once I satisfied myself on Cigna, I headed back to HumanaChoice and BCBS of Tennessee. Each of these was an extrapolated audit purporting to validate high-risk diagnoses. The nine diagnoses included the following: acute stroke, acute heart attack, embolism, vascular claudication, major depressive disorder, lung cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer, and prostate cancer.

The OIG claimed there was an overall error rate of 75 percent for Humana and 78 percent for BCBS. But those numbers are deceiving.

The OIG claimed a 100-percent error rate for breast cancer for both payers. BCS also had a 100-percent error rate for acute heart attack and Humana had a 100-percent error rate for acute stroke. Only vascular claudication and major depressive disorder had error rates of less than 90 percent.

Both Medicare Advantage (MA) plans raised the usual issues challenging the reviewer’s knowledge and skill, the use of a physician tiebreaker, and the OIGs failure to adhere to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Medicare Risk Adjustment Validation or (RADV) methodology. The OIG dismissed the payer’s entirely accurate observations with the usual canned response of essentially “we’re the OIG.”

Humana contested the findings for 10 claims in five diagnoses and BCBS contested 14 claims in seven diagnoses. Assuming Humana is correct on every contested claim it still would have an alleged 80 percent error rate. Similarly, if BCBS is correct it still has an alleged 73- percent error.

We should be concerned with the OIG’s audit for several reasons:

  • The definitions of diagnoses described by the OIG may not correspond to typical coding criteria. When 2 coders differ in their reviews the OIG uses a non-standard way to “break the tie.”
  • Next, the OIG ties the diagnosis, in some cases, to therapeutic requirements.
  • Third, these error rates mean the OIG will continue these audits. We should expect them to expand to provider audits.  Coding audits may be less susceptible to the ambiguity of inpatient status audits.
  • Fourth, payers rarely take reductions in revenue well. I expect payers will increase scrutiny of claims.

As payers see reductions in revenue associated with audits they will do one of two things: reduce services areas or work to reduce services.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC

John K. Hall, MD, JD, MBA, FCLM, FRCPC is a licensed physician in several jurisdictions and is admitted to the California bar. He is also the founder of The Aegis Firm, a healthcare consulting firm providing consultative and litigation support on a wide variety of criminal and civil matters related to healthcare. He lectures frequently on black-letter health law, mediation, medical staff relations, and medical ethics, as well as patient and physician rights. Dr. Hall hopes to help explain complex problems at the intersection of medicine and law and prepare providers to manage those problems.

Related Stories

Understanding the Wright Approach

Understanding the Wright Approach

Concern about hospitals sharing space has caused angst for several years. But as reiterated by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) official David Wright,

Read More

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Frank Cohen shows you how to leverage the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program (CERT) to create your own internal coding and billing risk assessment plan, including granular identification of risk areas and prioritizing audit tasks and functions resulting in decreased claim submission errors, reduced risk of audit-related damages, and a smoother, more efficient reimbursement process from Medicare.

April 9, 2024
2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.

March 21, 2024
Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.

February 22, 2024
Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Mastering Healthcare Refunds: Navigating Compliance with Confidence

Join healthcare attorney David Glaser, as he debunks refund myths, clarifies compliance essentials, and empowers healthcare professionals to safeguard facility finances. Uncover the secrets behind when to refund and why it matters. Don’t miss this crucial insight into strategic refund management.

February 29, 2024
2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDIs on important information in each of the AHA’s 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.

April 15, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

SPRING INTO SAVINGS! Get 21% OFF during our exclusive two-day sale starting 3/21/2024. Use SPRING24 at checkout to claim this offer. Click here to learn more →