Over the last few years, state ballot initiatives have emerged as a powerful tool in shaping healthcare policy across the country, and they appear to be gaining traction as a productive means of enacting healthcare reforms.
For those of us keeping track, this feels like one of the new yet unsung trends in healthcare, so it seems worthy of a bit more scrutiny – and perhaps some sunshine as well.
Ballot initiatives are typically citizen-initiated measures, but can also be assigned via the legislative process or by a special state commission. The ballot initiative process allows citizens to propose statutes or constitutional amendments, depending on the state, and to collect signatures to place their proposals on the ballot for voters to decide.
Several factors have contributed to the growing use of state ballot initiatives for healthcare issues, but most prominent is the frustration over gridlock at the federal level. With partisan divides often paralyzing Congress, advocates see state ballot initiatives as a way to bypass such gridlock and instead enact reforms by putting them straight to voters.
State ballot initiatives have been used to address a wide range of healthcare issues, from tackling medical debt to prescription drug pricing reform. Notable examples of 2023 healthcare ballot initiatives include safeguarding abortion rights in Ohio, Medicaid expansion in South Dakota, establishment of a dental medical loss ratio in Massachusetts, and making healthcare a constitutional right in Oregon.
And already this year, there is a campaign in Florida to put Medicaid expansion on the ballot, while South Dakota is interested in amending its Medicaid expansion via a second ballot initiative in as many years.
The rise of such state ballot initiatives has seemingly profound implications for the future of healthcare policy. On one hand, they offer a promising avenue for enacting reforms in the face of federal polarization. By empowering voters to directly shape healthcare policy, ballot initiatives can lead to more responsive and representative policymaking.
However, the use of ballot initiatives also raises concerns about the role of money and special interests in shaping healthcare policy. Campaigns for ballot initiatives can be costly, and well-funded interest groups may have disparate influence in shaping the outcome of these initiatives.
Additionally, the complexity of healthcare policy can make it difficult for voters to fully grasp the implications of the initiatives they are voting on, resulting in unintended consequences or ineffective solutions.
As such, it’s important to note that because ballot initiatives continue to be an increasingly popular way to change or introduce laws, some states are attempting to make it tougher for such initiatives to be introduced and passed.
A great illustration occurred last year in Ohio. Although ultimately rejected by voters, Ohio’s Ballot Board approved ballot language to raise thresholds for ballot initiatives to pass. The proposal attempted to mandate that all measures receive 60 percent of the vote, with an increased number of signatures to be placed on the ballot.
Moving forward, it will be important to carefully consider the role of ballot initiatives in shaping healthcare policy and to ensure that they are used in a way that promotes transparency, accountability, and equity.
This is currently amplified by the upcoming elections later in the year, as we’re likely to see several more ballot initiatives pop up in the fall. But clearly, the growing trend of using ballot initiatives on healthcare issues reflects a mounting recognition that state-level action can be uniquely valuable in driving change in healthcare, and this warrants our attention.
It’s no secret to any of us that there has been quite a bit of recent disagreement between the opposing sides of the political aisle
As Washington political gridlock keeps the nation in yet another federal shutdown, hospitals across Florida are bracing for ripple effects that could strain budgets and
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
