Well, the debate was held between Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump, and healthcare, particularly the Affordable Care Act (ACA), emerged as a key issue during the final stages of the discussion. Moderated by journalists Linsey Davis and David Muir, the debate highlighted the contrasting views on the potential future of the ACA.
Former President Trump, when pressed by Ms. Davis, remained vague about his intentions regarding the ACA. While Trump confirmed that he still envisioned replacing the ACA, his response lacked specifics. He mentioned having “concepts of a plan,” but stopped short of offering detailed proposals. His remarks hinted at potential changes to the law, but only if those changes could offer a “better and less expensive” solution. He further noted that the public would hear more about these concepts in the “not-too-distant future.”
This ambiguity reflects a broader shift within the Republican Party, which, under Trump’s leadership, had long campaigned to repeal the ACA. The former president made several attempts to dismantle the law during his first term, but those efforts failed to gain enough support in Congress, leaving the ACA intact. However, the healthcare debate resurfaced in the 2024 campaign, as Trump took to his social-media platform, Truth Social, to underscore healthcare as a priority issue, renewing his promise to replace the ACA if re-elected.
Vice President Harris took the opportunity during the debate to defend and promote the ACA. She pointed to the Biden Administration’s track record in preserving the healthcare law and expanding its reach. Harris underscored the ACA’s protections for individuals with pre-existing conditions and its pivotal role in reducing the uninsured rate.
Harris also highlighted the success of the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021, which temporarily enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health coverage through ACA marketplaces. The ARPA subsidies significantly reduced healthcare costs for millions of Americans, making coverage more affordable during the COVID-19 pandemic. These subsidies are currently set to expire at the end of 2025, but Harris reiterated her administration’s commitment to continuing the ACA’s expansion and possibly extending these benefits.
Harris pointed to newly released data that underscores the ACA’s impact on Americans’ healthcare access. According to the Biden Administration, 1 in 7 U.S. residents have gained coverage through the ACA marketplaces since 2014.
The ACA has seen a notable shift in public opinion since its inception. In November 2016, around the time of Trump’s election, a Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) tracking poll showed that only 43 percent of Americans held a favorable opinion of the law, while many were critical of the individual mandate and rising premium costs. However, as the ACA continued to provide tangible benefits to millions of people, public sentiment shifted. A more recent KFF survey conducted in April 2024 revealed that 62 percent of Americans now hold a favorable view of the ACA, compared to 37 percent who still view it unfavorably.
Healthcare has long been a contentious issue in U.S. politics, and the future of the ACA continues to be a central topic in national debates. Trump’s vague references to a new healthcare plan leave many questions unanswered, particularly regarding how his administration would handle key provisions of the ACA, such as protections for pre-existing conditions, Medicaid expansion, and insurance affordability.
Harris, on the other hand, aims to solidify her position as a defender of the ACA, emphasizing the need for stability in healthcare policy and continued efforts to expand coverage.
With millions of Americans covered under ACA marketplaces and new healthcare challenges on the horizon, the debate over the ACA’s future is far from settled. As the 2024 election unfolds, healthcare will undoubtedly remain a pivotal issue for voters, with both candidates offering vastly different paths forward.
EDITOR’S NOTE:
The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.
Welcome back everybody after the holidays. As a CPA, I have always been uncomfortable when the word “Audit” is used to describe activity since the term
Well, the fate of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (PPACA’s) enhanced premium tax credits, or PTCs, still hangs in the balance. And like
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
