Understanding the Healthcare Law that Protects Patients from Domestic or Governmental Abusers  

Last month, the medical staff at a Twin Cities hospital were treating a patient for a traumatic head injury. The patient was brought in by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents who stated that the patient had intentionally run into a wall.  

Nurses reported to several media outlets that the patient had multiple skull fractures on different locations of the head, including both sides, and the front and back. They saw no way that the injuries were consistent with a patient running into a wall. The medical staff strongly suspected the injuries were inflicted by agents. 

What should the nurses do in a situation like this? Report the situation to a government agency? Go to the media? Stay quiet because of patient confidentiality?   

Now, before I answer, last week, I was talking with one of my clients about their response to the ICE surge in Minnesota. They made a wise point. Emotions are running high now in Minnesota. 

I think that is with good reason. People don’t love it when their neighbors and nannies are being aggressively arrested, and that is happening. But emotional decision-making is risky. When discussing legal responses to ICE in the healthcare setting, it’s helpful to remember there’s really nothing special about ICE or the border patrol. The analysis of questions presented here are essentially the same as the questions raised with any government agency or in a variety of other privacy and reporting contexts. So instead of analyzing the question with respect to ICE, it is worth generalizing the question: how do you handle allegations of abuse by someone close to a patient?

When addressing regulatory questions, I think it’s helpful to consider four related questions. What must you do, what can’t you do, what can you do, and finally, what should you do? That general framework works for almost any legal issue.  

On the “must” front, when it comes to patients with an injury, there are several situations where a report may be required. The general duty to protect confidentiality is usually obviated by laws that require reporting of suspected abuse or neglect of children or vulnerable adults. Certain injuries like gun shot or stab wound might have to be reported. Because state laws vary, you must consider whether the person in question qualifies under one of the applicable laws.  

The only “can’t” is straightforward. You can’t report unless a law permits it or the patient consents.   

What “can” you do? 

Even when a report is not required, most states offer protections for certain reports that are made in good faith. In other words, in many states, you can resolve doubt in favor of reporting to certain agencies. 

But note that these laws will specify exactly how you must report. I am not aware of any situation in which going to the media will be permitted without patient consent. If someone does it, they do it at their own risk.    

What “should” you do? While that is an answer that I will have an opinion on, and I will generally offer that opinion to clients, “should” isn’t a legal question. 

While “should” isn’t a legal question, the other three are. In the healthcare context, I strongly encourage everyone to use their legal counsel to help analyze any issue like this. Nearly every hospital, clinic, skilled nursing facility, or healthcare organization has access to counsel who can help sort through complicated reporting requirements.  

Guessing wrong on one of these issues can have significant consequences. You may be sued by a patient or a patient’s relative for not reporting. If you accuse someone of abuse via a mechanism that doesn’t over legal protection, you may be sued by the person accused. If you think there is a possible reporting requirement or, just a possible danger to a patient, and you have any doubt about what to do, get legal counsel involved.  

In situations where a privilege exists for a report, it probably makes sense to err on the side of filing one. If you can get sued for your decision not to report, but you’re protected for a decision to report, that makes the question of what you “should” do relatively easy.  

The bottom line is that in most states, if someone brings you a patient and you believe that the person is responsible in some way for the patient’s injuries, there is a high probability that you can make a good faith report of those concerns without fear of liability.   

But there may be a particular reporting mechanism that you should use.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.

April 13, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Fourth Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

December 14, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Third Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

October 12, 2026

2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update: Second Quarter

Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.

July 13, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips

Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.

March 19, 2026

Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue

Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.

January 29, 2026

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24