“Outpatient” does not equate “same-day.”
By this time last year, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) had notified providers that they were removing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Medicare inpatient-only list. While the cries of disbelief and howls of frustration eventually died down after a few months, the remainder of 2018 has continued to be a confusing year. But, just when I thought things might level out as we approach 2019, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS) released a position statement entitled “Outpatient Joint Replacement.”
Much of the discussion in this position statement is significant, stressing the importance of patient safety, proper patient selection, and financial transparency. In fact, AAHKS goes as far as recommending to surgeons that they disclose any potential financial conflicts of interest related to ownership of the ambulatory surgery center, outpatient center, or distributorship. However, in the midst of ongoing confusion over which Medicare patients can be hospitalized as inpatient and which should be outpatient, the terminology used by AAHKS creates additional uncertainty.
In the introduction to the statement, AAHKS states, “Hospitals, surgeons and payers have recognized the potential benefits to patients that derive from decreasing the length of inpatient hospital stay after total hip and total knee arthroplasty, and even the potential benefits associated with same-day discharge in the outpatient setting for select patients. Further, with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS) recent decision to remove total knee arthroplasty from the Medicare inpatient-only list, future demand for same-day outpatient discharge for hip and knee arthroplasty is likely to increase.” They go on to say, “This position statement is intended to clearly state our priority of preserving patient safety and to outline specific recommendations for surgeons and institutions considering discharge of hip and knee replacement patients on a same-day outpatient basis.”
At face value, these statements stressing careful patient selection appear reasonable. But the statements, and others, also appear to equate outpatient surgery with same-day discharge. In other words, AAKHS implies that if a patient undergoes surgery as an outpatient in any location, the expectation should be that the patient will be discharged later that same day. And, while this is true for an outpatient surgery in an ambulatory surgery center, where the regulations require that the patient should not be expected to require care past midnight (42 CFR 416.166), this is not the case for an outpatient surgery performed in a hospital.
When a patient covered by Medicare has surgery performed as outpatient in a hospital, that patient may remain in the hospital overnight as an outpatient for their routine recovery following the surgery, with discharge taking place any time on post-op day one. While some orthopedic surgeons are not accustomed to this, other surgical specialists have been following this process for many years with surgeries such as cholecystectomies, mastectomies, transurethral prostate resections, and hysterectomies. In addition, cardiologists have also done this for years with scheduled cardiac interventions such as stenting, pacemaker placement, and defibrillator placement. Inpatient admission is warranted only for patients who specifically meet the requirements of the Two-Midnight Rule with its many nuances.
Commercial insurers also allow outpatient surgery patients to spend the night as part of their normal recovery if it is deemed necessary by the surgeon. As such, they consider routine recovery services included within the payment for the surgery itself. Rarely will they allow a patient whose recovery is expected to be one day to be admitted as inpatient. In fact, many commercial insurers will “allow” that outpatient surgery patient to remain outpatient for several days post-operatively if their recovery is simply slower than expected.
While I appreciate the efforts of the AAHKS to advocate for both patients and surgeons, their unfortunate use of “outpatient” and “same day” as synonyms is only going to contribute to ongoing confusion among their members. I believe the AAHKS should retract their position statement and revise it to clearly differentiate between outpatient surgery at a hospital, where routine recovery can include an overnight stay, and outpatient surgery at an ambulatory surgery center, where the patient should be expected to discharge the same calendar day.
The expectation of overnight recovery in a hospital makes these two types of “outpatient surgeries” significantly different. And, it is clear there is a clinical differentiation between the patient who can undergo outpatient surgery in a hospital from a patient who can undergo outpatient surgery in an ambulatory surgery center.
Despite our best efforts, we have been unable to get the regulations changed, which leaves changing the position statement as the only viable option.
Welcome back everybody after the holidays. As a CPA, I have always been uncomfortable when the word “Audit” is used to describe activity since the term
I am going to start 2026 by doing something I rarely do, and that is compliment an insurance company, and United Healthcare at that. As you
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
