Plaintiffs are the American Hospital Association and three other regional hospitals and healthcare systems.
Providers with Medicare appeals pending may have their claims resolved sooner than expected. On Nov. 1, 2018, U.S. District Court Judge Boasberg ruled that the U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services (HHS) must eliminate the Medicare appeals backlog by the end of fiscal year 2022.
Currently, there is a backlog of 426,594 appeals. Judge Boasberg’s ruling imposes a timetable for reducing the backlog of appeals. Specifically, HHS must clear 19 percent of the appeals by the end of fiscal year 2019; 49 percent of the appeals by the end of fiscal year 2020; 75 percent by the end of fiscal year 2021; and eliminate the backlog entirely by the end of 2022. Beginning on Dec. 31, 2018, HHS must file quarterly status reports on its progress.
This long-awaited ruling comes years after the American Hospital Association (AHA) filed the lawsuit alleging that HHS was violating federal law by failing to process appeals according to statutorily-mandated timeframes. Federal regulations require appeals at the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) hearing level to be completed within 90 days following the date the request for hearing is received by the Office of Medicare Hearings and Appeals (OMHA).[1] The current average processing time, however, for a case pending at the ALJ level is more than three years.[2]
The Complaint, which was filed by the AHA in 2014, was initially dismissed by the District Court for lack of jurisdiction. In February 2016, the D.C. Circuit Court reversed the District Court’s dismissal and ordered the District Court to issue a decision on the merits. In December 2016, the District Court entered summary judgment in favor of the AHA and ordered HHS to comply with a timetable to eliminate the backlog of appeals by 2020. In August 2017, the D.C. Circuit again reversed the District Court and ordered the District Court to evaluate HHS’ claim that compliance with the timetable would be impossible.
In his recent decision, Judge Boasberg found that he could “easily conclude that it would be possible” for HHS to reduce and then eliminate the backlog as a result of increased funding from Congress to HHS.[3] In March 2018, Congress appropriated $182.3 million for the purpose of addressing the backlog and, by HHS’ own projections, the increased adjudication capacity as a result of the additional funding would allow HHS to “eliminate the backlog entirely in FY 2022.”[4] According to Judge Boasberg’s decision, HHS can request a modification of the order if Congress reduces HHS’ funding such that it would be impossible to comply with the timetable for reducing appeals.
Aside from the issue of whether it was possible for HHS to comply with the court-ordered timetable, Judge Boasberg found that the equities weighed in favor of the AHA as the lengthy Medicare appeals process impacts “hospitals’ willingness and ability” to provide care to patients.[5]
Judge Boasberg denied the AHA’s requests to reduce the interest charged on appeals, allow providers to rebill their claims for six months following issuance of the Court’s order, and require that HHS maintain its current settlement programs. Judge Boasberg concluded that “[w]here the agency is held to a set of deadlines, it is unnecessary – and unwise – to further specify the steps it must take.”[6]
If Judge Boasberg’s decision stands, it will significantly change the current Medicare audit timeline and the way that Medicare appeals are handled by providers and attorneys.
Program Note:
Listen to healthcare attorney Andrew Wachler report this story live on Monitor Monday, Nov. 12, 10-10:30 a.m.
[1] 42 C.F.R. 405.1016(a).
[2] Average Processing Time By Fiscal Year, https://www.hhs.gov/about/agencies/omha/about/current-workload/index.html
[3] AHA v. Azar, 2018 U.S. Dist. Lexis 186853, *8 (D.D.C. 2018) (emphasis in original).
[4] Id. at *7 (emphasis in original).
[5] Id. at *11.
[6] Id. at *13.
To provide a No Surprises Act update, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) new Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) guidelines face backlash from medical
Ok, I will admit that I am a glass-half-empty guy. I would love to always see the positives in things, but someone has to be
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Unlock the keys to bridging the clinical-finance disconnect by transforming your approach to revenue cycle collaboration for superior patient care and financial prosperity!
Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he delves into the pivotal connection between case management, utilization review, and hospital revenue cycles, unveiling strategies to enhance communication and align goals effectively. Discover how to overcome hidden challenges hindering seamless collaboration and gain insights imperative for success
During this webcast Dr. Hirsch will breakdown the CMS-4201-F rule and the new federal regulations, how and when they will apply to Medicare Advantages plans.
The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.
A massive task lies ahead! Now’s the time to start preparing your case management and utilization review teams for successful implementation of changes contained in the 2024 IPPS, OPPS and MPFS rules.
Uncover effective techniques to foster provider understanding of CDI, empower CDISs and coders to customize their queries for enhanced effectiveness, and learn to engage adult learners, leveraging their experiences for superior learning outcomes. Elevate your CDI expertise, leading to fewer coding errors, reduced claim denials, and minimized audit issues.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast series will help you acquire the critical knowledge you need to completely and accurately assign ICD-10-PCS and CPT® codes for spinal fusion and other common spinal procedures.
This exclusive ICD10monitor webcast is intended to elevate and streamline outpatient coding for spinal procedures. Our expert presenter, Kim Felix, RHIA, CCS., will provide clear, detailed explanations covering spinal anatomy, spinal procedures, and correct CPT coding practices.
During this exclusive ICD10monitor webcast, inpatient coders will gain a profound understanding of prevalent spinal procedures. They’ll delve into the intricate anatomy, grasp the purpose and method behind these procedures, uncover essential elements within physician documentation, and receive expert guidance, step by step, on constructing accurate ICD-10-PCS codes. It’s the key to enhancing their expertise and ensuring coding precision.
Copyright © 2023 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
