Given that they share similar names and themes, it is easy to conflate Price Transparency and the No Surprises Act, but while they are both significant federal provisions that attempt to help consumers understand healthcare pricing, they are quite different.
I fear that an Executive Order dated Feb. 25 may augment that confusion.
First, I want to be clear that while I have sniped at some of the details of both the No Surprises Act and the Price Transparency provision, I wholeheartedly endorse the concept of improving the clarity of medical pricing. I don’t believe pricing constitutes the industry’s shining moment.
But I also understand how confusing the provisions can be, and I worry that this Executive Order will add to the problem. After discussing Price Transparency at some length, the Order says that it will “require the disclosure of the actual prices of items and services, not estimates.” But the Price Transparency provisions already require actual prices and not estimates. Estimates are found in the No Surprises Act.
Let me try to explain the differences.
Price Transparency only applies to hospitals. At the risk of oversimplifying things a bit, it imposes two basic requirements. First, for all services, each hospital has to create machine-readable files that essentially list every negotiated charge with every third-party payer for the service.
Each hospital also must specifically identify the highest and lowest charge. The second requirement is that hospitals create a user-friendly, public-facing list on their websites of shoppable services that are available.
Both requirements specifically use the word “charge.” The machine-readable file and the website are to list your charge. To the best of my knowledge, the word “estimate” doesn’t appear in any Price Transparency discussion.
If you’re thinking about all of the discussion we have had about good-faith estimates, that is part of the No Surprises Act. Good-faith estimates may make pricing more “transparent,” but they are not part of the Price Transparency Act.
The No Surprises Act is arguably more complicated than Price Transparency, because it applies in many different settings and circumstances. First, it applies to all emergency care provided at hospitals and via ground ambulance. It also applies when a patient goes to an in-network hospital, emergency department (ED), or ambulatory surgical center (ASC) but receives care from an out-of-network medical professional. Finally, it also creates a duty to provide good-faith estimates at a long list of facilities and professionals that probably include almost all of our readers.
One of my frustrations with the provision is that it defines the word “facilities” differently for the two requirements. The limits on out-of-network professionals only apply to hospitals, freestanding EDs, and ASCs, while the good-faith estimates apply nearly universally to hospitals, labs, imaging centers, and probably to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs).
In each case, the rule refers to the covered parties as “facilities.” They all must give estimates to people who are not using insurance to pay for their care. And in the future, they will have to provide estimates to everyone. So, it is the No Surprises Act, not Price Transparency, that calls for estimates. Is the Executive Order conflating two different provisions? I’m not sure, but it seems like it is. Hospitals need to be sure that they are providing information about their charges to meet the Price Transparency requirements.
Hotly anticipated performance targets and payment amounts for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) Model
While many in hospitals find understanding the new regulations on Medicare Advantage (MA) plan denials challenging, it appears that the payers are also having a
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Uncover essential coding insights with nationally recognized coding authority Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS. Through ICD10monitor’s interactive, on‑demand webcast series, Kay walks you through the AHA’s 2026 ICD‑10‑CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics, translating each update into practical, easy‑to‑apply guidance designed to sharpen precision, ensure compliance, and strengthen day‑to‑day decision‑making. Available shortly after each official release.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s fourth quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s third quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Uncover critical guidance on the ICD-10-CM/PCS code updates. Kay Piper reviews and explains ICD-10-CM/PCS coding guidelines in the AHA’s second quarter 2026 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic in an easy to access on-demand webcast.
Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
BLOOM INTO SAVINGS! Get 25% OFF during our spring sale through March 27. Use code SPRING26 at checkout to claim this offer.
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
