Making the case for Safe Transitions

Making the case for Safe Transitions

How safe is the transition from hospital to home if you cannot get the services the person needs at home when they are ready to transition? 

We are experiencing challenges with home health care agencies not being available for our patients that need home care at discharge.  Are you also experiencing this issue? 

The staffing crisis is everywhere, and our home health care partners are not immune to this.  But it isn’t usually the staffing that seems to hinder the agency from taking on patients to care for.  It seems to be the insurance companies and the contracts that they do or do not create for home health care follow up.

Remember that Medicare Advantage (MA) plans can provide more care than Traditional Medicare if they chose, but they must provide at least what Medicare covers.  This would include Skilled Intermittent Home Health Care visits. 

Over the past few years, the MA plans are contracting with less agencies.  We have experienced, time and again, that those agencies decline the referral for our patients because of the agency experience of no reimbursement by the insurance company for which they claim to be contracted.

In the discharge planning rules set forth by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), the hospital must have the conversation about goals of care and make sure that the home care agency has the skilled caregivers to provide the visits at home.  They hospital must also offer choice of agency, and document that choice.  We have educated our teams around the way to discuss the next site of care so that this is a comfortable discussion and so we are not just shoving a bunch of agencies at them and asking them to pick one. 

But there is a problem now:

Imagine if you will, a patient with a skilled need that needs home health care.  Not only does the hospital want to have the physician attest to the face-to-face meeting in order to guarantee that the physician agrees that the patient needs home care, but the hospital also has to keep a running list of which home care agency is used by which insurance company. 

They discuss with the patient and family, obtain agreement with them, document in the chart.  But it isn’t over until the agency accepts that referral.  When they send the referral to that agency and the agency declines, we are left with an unsafe discharge plan. Now they must go back to the patient and tell them the outcome and change the agency and change the documentation.  All of this to stay in compliance with the regulations, and to provide a safe transition.

So then, what if you cannot find an agency to take the referral?  What then? 

We have had an experience such as this recently and it seems to be getting worse.

A very recent experience was a patient with a new Tracheostomy and feeding tube.  The Insurance company declined Skilled Care Facility and told the home health care team.  This was a good option since there was motivated family to help and the patient was very independent in walking and taking on the other care she needed.  But the team was unable to find a home health care agency that was contracted with that payer that would take on the patient.  Imagine going home without any skilled home care like that?  After seven more unnecessary days in the hospital, they finally found an agency that would take the patient, but that agency had to sign a Single Case Agreement with the insurance company. 

How complicated can it get? 

What do the hospitals do?  They get creative.  They set up more frequent physician visits to make sure that the patient is cared for.  They reach out to the community Care Managers (who also do not get paid typically by the insurance company either).  There are not many Parish Nurses left in the communities either so they do the best they can by teaching and training the patient’s family/loved ones to provide the care.   This is a huge burden on the family and patient.  But the alternative would be to keep a patient that no longer needs acute hospital care in the hospital.  And that is not a safe plan either. 

CMS changed the DCP rules back in 2019. The hospitals provide all sorts of information about the Home care agencies:  quality scores, readmission rates (part of quality scores).  I wonder if there is a time when the hospital could provide data to the patient about their insurance and the way they do not do what they promise they will do at times.   Shouldn’t CMS hold the MA plans accountable for those post-acute services that they claim they contract with agencies for, yet do not pay for.

If you have experienced this, please make sure your voice is heard.  Reach out the CMS and provide details of this.  We must help advocate for your Home Health Care agencies or there will not be any left, and we need them.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Mary Beth Pace, RN, BSN, MBA, ACM, CMAC

Mary Beth Pace is vice president of care management at Trinity Health.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

AI, Audits, and the Future of the Revenue Cycle

Artificial intelligence is rapidly transforming healthcare revenue cycle operations, from coding and auditing to compliance and denials. Join industry leaders Pam Warren (MaineHealth) and Raemarie Jimenez (AAPC) for a live fireside chat exploring how AI is changing workflows, workforce roles, payer-provider dynamics, and compliance risk—and what organizations should be doing now to prepare.

June 17, 2026

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Celebrate Lab Week with MedLearn! Sign up to win one year of our Laboratory All Access Pass! Click here to learn more →

Have a Medicare regulation question you’d love Dr. Hirsch to answer? Now is your chance! CLICK HERE to learn more→

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24