What happens when the streams cross?
One of the most memorable lines from the 1984 comedy film Ghostbusters was when Harold Ramis’s character, Egon Spengler, warns ominously of the team’s proton pack weapons: “Don’t cross the streams!” My colleagues and I have written many articles about hospital price transparency, and many more about the No Surprises Act (NSA). But what happens when those two streams cross? That’s a topic we haven’t discussed – until now.
One element of the NSA is that when a healthcare organization believes it is being under-compensated by an insurance company, there is an independent dispute resolution (IDR) process to determine whether the qualified payment amount (QPA) offered by the insurance company is fair. Much of the NSA litigation brought by the Texas Medical Association, which has frequently prevailed, involves the question of whether the arbitrator should give extra weight to the insurance company’s data. Fortunately, and wisely, the courts have said no.
But this is where the stream-crossing can become a big deal. Under the price transparency regulations, hospitals are required to make available, in a machine-readable format, all of their contractually agreed rates for every private payor. This treasure trove of data creates a new mechanism to determine fair reimbursement, also allowing patients and their families to better determine norms.
Quite candidly, I have no absolutely no clue what insights that data will yield; whether it will help health insurers or hospitals more is well beyond my pay grade. But I know this: the existence of that pool of data is likely to revolutionize the IDR process.
Anyone with the ability to analyze the myriad of machine-readable data from hospitals across the country will have the ability to make arguments about the reasonableness of a hospital’s charges. Most hospitals seem concerned about the data, but I would posit that only half should be.
If you are above the median, it is true that you will face pressure to lower your fees. But if you are below the median, you will have new leverage in contract negotiations. I was never a Prairie Home Companion listener, but I know that in Lake Wobegon, “all the children were above average.”
I suspect that such overconfidence is common and that many hospitals believe (or at least hope) that they skillfully negotiated “above-average” contracts and fear that the data will show it. The reality, of course, is that by definition, only 50 percent are above the median.
I do worry that large insurers, which are used to working with and manipulating data, will have an advantage when it comes to using the data. Hopefully, a resourceful consulting company with a predisposition toward helping healthcare organizations will step in as a counterweight.
One other NSA point. A client recently mentioned that a third-party administrator (TPA) moved to have an IDR claim dismissed, arguing that the plan, rather than the TPA, should have been served with the action. The American Hospital Association (AHA) has noted that the regulatory framework about this is less clear than it should be; but wow, it takes chutzpah for a TPA that appears as the contact on insurance cards to say “You should send your claims to us, but not your IDR notices.” I assume their motion will fail, but I will let you know.
If you’re feeling like you don’t have a good understanding of the hospital price transparency regulations, or you have other questions about healthcare pricing in general, I’ve got good news for you. Fredrikson’s free monthly health law webinar for November was about pricing. While the live broadcast is over, it’s recorded, so you can listen for free at any time. Register here.
Compliance teams get nervous when rules are not followed. And when an expired form is used, they get really nervous. Thankfully, there is one fewer
When you engage an expert, it can become easy to think, “Now I don’t have to do anything myself; I can rely on their wisdom!”
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
