Let me start with a statement of the obvious and a brief overview of federal law. As for the obvious, if the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) is asking questions about your practice, you’re having a very bad day. And you need a lawyer.
In the government’s battle against fraud and abuse, there are three statutes with which you should be familiar. The first is the False Claims Act (FCA). The second is the Anti-Kickback Statute or AKS. And the third is the Physician Self-Referral or Stark law. An additional tool sometimes used is the wire fraud statute.
The FCA provides for both civil and criminal penalties. Fraud allegations may arise from AKS or Stark law violations. AKS is a criminal law prohibiting a wide range of “remuneration.” Finally, Stark prohibits self-referrals for many government-funded services.
On that background, let’s look at four recent cases highlighted by DOJ. The first case is a bit unusual in that it’s a guilty verdict from a jury trial. Jose Goyos was part of a scheme that tricked doctors into submitting $67 million in unnecessary genetic testing. Medicare paid over $52 million. He and 20 defendants await sentencing for wire fraud and money laundering. They face up to 30 years in prison.
The next two cases are judgments based on guilty pleas. Lourdes Navarro enabled Matias Clinical Laboratory to perform over $350 million in unnecessary viral testing, even though only COVID testing had been ordered. Navarro pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit healthcare and wire fraud. She faces up to 20 years in prison.
The next case is David Lu, an owner of two New York state pharmacies. Lu pleaded guilty to billing Medicare for $25 million in unnecessary prescriptions through bribes and kickbacks. In this case, the payments to doctors were in the form of rent and office staff.
The final case involves a settlement with the government arising from a whistleblower claim. In this case, Cardiac Imaging Inc. and its CEO Sam Kancherlapalli agreed to pay more than $85 million to resolve allegations that they paid cardiologists excessive fees. The fees allegedly exceeded fair-market value and covered services not actually provided. Cardiac Imaging and Kancherlapalli were also required to enter into a five-year Corporate Integrity Agreement with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG).
We can learn several things from these cases.
First, criminal trials continue to be less common than guilty pleas and settlements. Convictions, regardless of trial or plea, may carry a stiff prison sentence. Remember, there’s no parole from federal prison.
Second, some of the schemes involved outright trickery. Providers need to be aware of who they’re dealing with, and to whom they are providing some form of authorization. Ensure that your contracts offer the right to audit contractor billing practices.
Third, if a vendor offers compensation connected to the purchase of its product or services, be very cautious. AKS and Stark are very broad, with carefully circumscribed exceptions. Always make sure your relationship is reduced to a comprehensive writing covering every aspect of the transaction.
Fourth, if the compensation seems to be too good to be true or more generous than expected, there’s probably a catch. That catch may be a violation of AKS or Stark. You need a fair market assessment from a third party.
While attending the Florida Compliance and Privacy Consortium meeting, I was asked an excellent question. What if a patient who is ready for discharge from
We have been talking a lot lately about the malfeasance of Medicare Advantage (MA) plans, and deservedly so. But malfeasance can be a two-way street.
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
