Back in June, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a memo titled “Requirements for Hospital Discharges to Post-Acute Care Providers,” which was sent to survey agencies that received no notice at all. Fortunately, I came across it and can now share it with everyone.
But a bit of background first.
We all know that CMS has regulations about discharge planning, as found in 42 CFR 482.43. These regulations were modified in 2019. Most notable was the requirement to provide information on post-acute care providers’ resource use and quality of care. CMS also expanded the requirement to offer choices, to include long-term acute-care hospitals (LTACHs) and inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), in addition to home care and skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), although they continue to note that patients should always be offered choices for any provider to which they are being referred.
CMS also publishes interpretive guidelines that accompany every section of the Conditions of Participation that guide survey organizations when scrutinizing a facility for compliance with the regulations. These are very helpful in that they outline what the surveyors will do. But in the case of the 2019 changes to the discharge planning rules, CMS still has not released the interpretive guidelines, leaving the survey organizations to make things up as they go.
With that background, according to this memo, CMS has received reports of patients being transferred to post-acute care providers without adequate information – and they are not happy. As a result, they are alerting survey organizations to address some specific deficiencies.
So, what are the issues?
First, not telling the post-acute provider that the patient had behavioral issues that required additional care. While at the time of transfer, the patient may not have needed a sitter, the use of the sitter during the stay would alert the post-acute provider that there is a potential for behavioral issues.
Next, CMS called out poor medication reconciliation, especially omitting the patient’s use of psychotropics and opioids during a hospital stay. They note that in some instances, patients with ongoing opioid medications were not sent with a hard copy of the prescription, resulting in inability of the facility to obtain the medication in a timely manner. CMS also noted that post-acute providers were not informed about skin issues that required treatment in the hospital.
CMS went on to note that some post-acute providers were not informed that the patient had durable medical equipment (DME), such as BiPAP or a wound vac. In this case, the patient would arrive with the immediate need for DME, but the post-acute provider would not have had time to arrange the delivery to the facility. Next was lack of communication about the patient’s home environment that would be relevant to the post-acute provider when planning for discharge from their facility, including omitting information that the patient was homeless or had no caregiver.
Now, just reading the list of issues, the pessimist in me sees a pattern of hospitals that omitted crucial information, perhaps in order to get a post-acute provider to accept a patient who was challenging or costly. Obviously, this is not acceptable. No hospital likes to have a patient who is stable for discharge but has no safe destination – but the solution is not to deceptively transfer the patient so they become someone else’s problem. Of course, many of these errors may have been inadvertent, with perhaps the discharging staff unaware that the patient required a sitter when the patient was on another hospital unit or unaware of the extent of skin breakdown, because the wound care nurse was managing that aspect of the patient’s care.
CMS also noted that hospitals have been omitting information about the patient’s goals of care and treatment preferences. CMS is very big on ensuring that medical decisions are made in collaboration with the patient, so we need to ensure that we are asking patients about their goals of care and treatment preferences – and documenting their preferences. They also called out patient preferences for end-of-life care, suggesting that some patients who did not want resuscitation were resuscitated anyway, because that information was not conveyed to the facility.
So, what do you do?
Download this document and read it, then assess your discharge program. CMS even provides a link within the document to a discharge checklist. They do not endorse this form, but if they link to it, you know they like it.
Finally, it is crucial to note that this memo was addressed to survey agencies. CMS is telling them to focus their reviews on these issues. If that’s not a red flag to be sure that your processes are in order, I don’t know what is.
Following President Trump’s move into the Oval Office and his administration getting set up in the federal agencies, we’ve seen unprecedented movement on certain legislative
Despite some uncertainly in light of the Trump administration’s hold placed on all pending federal regulations, it has been confirmed with the Centers for Medicare
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Master the complexities of heart failure coding with this expert-led webcast by Emily Montemayor, CCS, CMBCS, COC, CPC, CPMA. Discover strategies to ensure compliance with ICD-10-CM guidelines, documentation integrity, and capture comorbidities like CKD and hypertension. Learn how to resolve coding challenges, improve documentation practices, and submit clean claims to minimize denials and safeguard your organization’s financial health. With practical insights and real-world examples, this session equips you to prevent revenue leakage, enhance compliance, and secure optimal reimbursement—all while supporting better patient outcomes.
Prepare your organization for the 2025 OPPS updates with expert insights from Tiffani Bouchard, CCS, CRCR, a Revenue Integrity Professional with over 30 years of experience. This webcast will address critical challenges in charge capture and coding, providing clarity on APC policies, C-APC packaging, exclusions, and payer-specific requirements. Attendees will learn actionable strategies to ensure compliance, optimize reimbursement, and mitigate risks of claim denials. Gain the knowledge needed to implement updates effectively, educate your team, and maintain seamless revenue cycle operations in the face of evolving OPPS complexities.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch dives into the basics of Medicare for clinicians to be successful as utilization review professionals. He’ll break down what Medicare does and doesn’t pay for, what services it provides and how hospitals get paid for providing those services – including both inpatient and outpatient. Learn how claims are prepared and how much patients must pay for their care. By attending our webcast, you will gain a new understanding of these issues and be better equipped to talk to patients, to their medical staff, and to their administrative team.
Hospitals face growing challenges in measuring observation metrics due to inconsistencies in classification, payer policies, and benchmarking practices. Join Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, and Anuja Mohla, DO, FACP, MBA, ACPA-C, CHCQM-PHYADV as they provide critical insights into refining observation metrics. This webcast will address key issues affecting observation data integrity and offer strategies for improving consistency in reporting. You will learn how to define meaningful metrics, clarify commonly misinterpreted terms, and apply best practices for benchmarking, and gain actionable strategies to enhance observation data reliability, mitigate financial risk, and drive better decision-making.
The 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule brings significant changes to payment rates, coverage, and coding for physician services, impacting practices nationwide. Join Stanley Nachimson, MS., as he provides a comprehensive guide to understanding these updates, offering actionable insights on new Medicare-covered services, revised coding rules, and payment policies effective January 1. Learn how to adapt your practices to maintain compliance, maximize reimbursement, and plan for revenue in 2025. Whether you’re a physician, coder, or financial staff member, this session equips you with the tools to navigate Medicare’s evolving requirements confidently and efficiently.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Copyright © 2025 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
