Hiring Practices in the Compliance Environment

Hiring Practices in the Compliance Environment

EDITOR’S NOTE: Healthcare attorney David Glaser is a permanent panelist on Monitor Mondays.

Hiring is both difficult and important, yet we rarely discuss strategies for making it better. I am lucky enough to regularly present at Health Care Compliance Association (HCCA) conferences. As a result, I have heard dozens, if not hundreds, of presentations at HCCA functions.

But I cannot think of a single presentation I saw that offered strategies for hiring the right people. That surprises me a bit. If you think about it, hiring wisely may be the single most important thing that you do in your line of work.

You can establish policies, train people, and have the best practices to review claims, but if the professionals executing the tasks do not do a stellar job, your effort is all for naught. So, how can you improve your odds that you are identifying the best talent? 

Obviously, it can be very challenging to hire well. I have certainly had some spectacular failures in my hiring. But there are a few tricks I have learned over the years. 

I try to ask unusual questions or put a small twist on the questions everyone is asking. I want to have the candidate caught a bit off-guard. For example, instead of asking someone how they would describe themselves, I will ask how friends and co-workers would describe them. Instead of asking “what is your biggest weakness,” I ask candidates to tell me what traits they have that drive the people closest to them crazy. 

In a regulatory environment, you want colleagues who are critical thinkers. But it can be very difficult to determine whether someone is analytical during an interview. I think it can be useful to use real-world problems as a tool to explore a candidate’s talents. Pick one of the more challenging issues you have had, and then ask how they would handle it. Ask them about the most difficult decisions they have made at work, and what factors they considered while they worked through the problem.   

One of my favorite questions is “have there been situations where you have had a disagreement with a supervisor? If so, please tell me about the disagreement and how you approached it.” In the context of healthcare, I might even ask specifically about potential refunds and whether there have been situations in which they disagreed with a recommendation to issue a refund or to retain money. I am hoping to get a sense of whether the candidate is open-minded.

Do they listen to advice from co-workers and legal counsel, or are they too strident to consider other’s opinions? Can they see shades of grey? Are they a creative thinker? I also want to assess their independence, so I may ask if they would prefer to be told what to do or figure it out themselves. 

None of these questions are guaranteed to work, and candidates are certainly capable of misrepresenting their skills, but by asking for specific examples of real-world problems, I think you can get much more insight than if you rely solely on the candidate’s self-assessment. 

Programming note: Listen to healthcare attorney David Glaser every Monday on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern.

EDITOR’S NOTE:

The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views or opinions of MedLearn Media. We provide a platform for diverse perspectives, but the content and opinions expressed herein are the author’s own. MedLearn Media does not endorse or guarantee the accuracy of the information presented. Readers are encouraged to critically evaluate the content and conduct their own research. Any actions taken based on this article are at the reader’s own discretion.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

David M. Glaser, Esq.

David M. Glaser is a shareholder in Fredrikson & Byron's Health Law Group. David assists clinics, hospitals, and other health care entities negotiate the maze of healthcare regulations, providing advice about risk management, reimbursement, and business planning issues. He has considerable experience in healthcare regulation and litigation, including compliance, criminal and civil fraud investigations, and reimbursement disputes. David's goal is to explain the government's enforcement position, and to analyze whether this position is supported by the law or represents government overreaching. David is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is a popular guest on Monitor Mondays.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules – Part 2

Medicare regulations are complex and even seasoned professionals struggle to apply them consistently. Due to overwhelming demand, Dr. Hirsch returns for Part 2 of Ask Dr. Hirsch: Clarifying Medicare’s Most Misunderstood Rules to answer even more of Medicare’s most misunderstood questions, covering inpatient status, observation, SNF access, Medicare Advantage denials, and more. Join Dr. Hirsch as he provides clear, referenced answers to real-world questions submitted by your peers, helping you navigate Medicare compliance with confidence and clarity.

June 18, 2026

Reengineering Utilization Management: Building an Adaptive Model for the New Payer Era

Traditional utilization management models can no longer keep pace with regulatory shifts, payer scrutiny, and operational pressures. In this webcast, Tiffany Ferguson, LMSW, CMAC, ACM, ACPA-C, introduces an Adaptive Model strategy that modernizes UM through role specialization, technology-driven workflows, and proactive, team-based processes. Attendees will learn how to restructure programs to improve efficiency, strengthen clinical collaboration, and enhance financial performance in a rapidly changing healthcare environment.

May 20, 2026

Compliance for the Inpatient Psychiatric Facility (IPF-PPS): Minimizing Federal Audit Findings by Strengthening Best Practices

Federal auditors are intensifying their focus on inpatient psychiatric facilities, using advanced data analytics to spotlight outliers and pursue high‑dollar repayments. In this high‑impact webcast, Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, Compliance Officer and V.P., Hospital & Physician Compliance, breaks down what regulators are really targeting in IPF-PPS admissions, documentation, treatment and discharge planning. Attendees will learn practical steps to tighten processes, avoid common audit triggers and protect reimbursement and reduce the risk of multimillion-dollar repayment demands.

April 9, 2026

Mastering MDM for Accurate Professional Fee Coding

In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.

March 31, 2026

Trending News

Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more

Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!

This Memorial Day, we honor those who gave all for our freedom. Take 20% off sitewide through May 29 with code MEMORIAL26 at checkout

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24