Why Labor Investigations Target Independent Contractors

Why Labor Investigations Target Independent Contractors

Today I want to touch on a type of investigation that affects healthcare providers of all types: U.S. Department of Labor investigations, and specifically those that classify workers as independent contractors versus employees.

Why does it matter?

Because now the topic is coming under scrutiny.

The Department of Labor, which has seen an increase in its ability to bring enforcement actions in recent years, has flagged the healthcare industry as a prime target for investigation.

According to the Department of Labor, in the 2022 fiscal year, the agency’s Wage and Hour Division recovered more than $32.5 million in back wages, specifically for workers in healthcare. That’s more than its recovery for workers in agriculture, retail, food services, or business services, and only just barely less than the recovery in the construction industry.

Why has the Department of Labor targeted healthcare facilities for investigations into employee misclassification, sometimes claiming millions of dollars in unpaid overtime?

The issue is that independent contractors are effectively considered self-employed, so they aren’t subject to federal minimum wage and overtime requirements. During COVID-19, we all know there was a huge demand for healthcare workers, and a lot of facilities turned to contract nursing and other contracted positions to provide necessary healthcare during the pandemic. Now, as we are transitioning out of the public health emergency (PHE), healthcare employers should pay close attention to how their workers are classified.

Now, there’s no black-and-white answer as to whether an individual should be classified as an employee or an independent contractor, but here are six things to consider:

  1. How much control the person has over how the work is performed;
  2. The person’s opportunity for profit or loss, depending upon his or her managerial skill – for example, whether they earn a set salary, or they control how much money they can make;
  3. The relative degree of investment in equipment or materials that are required for their tasks;
  4. Whether the services provided by the person require special skill;
  5. The degree of permanency and duration of the working relationship; and
  6. The extent to which the services are an integral part of the healthcare facility’s business.

All of these factors are important, but I want to focus first on degree of permanency. Again, during the PHE, providers were relying on a lot of short-term contracts just to keep up with the demand for services, and in a lot of cases, those short-term contracts got renewed multiple times. I want to encourage providers to take inventory of their independent contractor arrangements, keeping these six factors in mind, and consider whether they may need to reassess any current worker classifications. Employers should correct any misclassifications they find, since enforcement can be retroactive, and they may be responsible for back pay.

If someone is misclassified, the biggest risk of liability usually arises from state or federal labor investigations and enforcement actions. However, individuals themselves who think they have been misclassified (and, for instance, should be owed overtime) often have the independent ability to bring a lawsuit, either in state or federal court. These violations of wage and hour laws are often really costly, and most statutes mandate double or triple damages for violations and mandatory payments of a plaintiff’s attorney’s fees.

So, the takeaway is to pay attention to how providers are classified – and if you can, conduct an internal audit and fix any past misclassifications. And, of course, be prepared for increased audits by the Department of Labor.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Cara Ludwig, Esq.

Cara Ludwig is an expert healthcare attorney with nearly a decade of experience. She currently is a partner with Nelson Mullins, and got her degree from Washington and Lee University School of Law.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

Mastering the Two-Midnight Rule: Keys to Navigating Short-Stay Admissions with Confidence

The CMS Two-Midnight Rule and short-stay audits are here to stay, impacting inpatient and outpatient admissions, ASC procedures, and Medicare Parts C & D. New for 2024, the Two-Midnight Rule applies to Medicare Advantage patients, requiring differentiation between Medicare plans affecting Case Managers, Utilization Review, and operational processes and knowledge of a vital distinction between these patients that influences post-discharge medical reviews and compliance risk. Join Michael G. Calahan for a comprehensive webcast covering federal laws for all admission processes. Gain the knowledge needed to navigate audits effectively and optimize patient access points, personnel, and compliance strategies. Learn Two-Midnight Rule essentials, Medicare Advantage implications, and compliance best practices. Discover operational insights for short-stay admissions, outpatient observation, and the ever-changing Inpatient-Only Listing.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 19, 2023
Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Secondary Diagnosis Coding: A Deep Dive into Guidelines and Best Practices

Explore comprehensive guidelines and best practices for secondary diagnosis coding in our illuminating webcast. Delve into the intricacies of accurately assigning secondary diagnosis codes to ensure precise medical documentation. Learn how to navigate complex scenarios and adhere to coding regulations while enhancing coding proficiency. Our expert-led webcast covers essential insights, including documentation requirements, sequencing strategies, and industry updates. Elevate your coding skills and stay current with the latest coding advancements so you can determine the correct DRG assignment to optimize reimbursement, support medical decision-making, and maintain compliance.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 20, 2023
Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing

Enhance your inpatient coding precision and revenue with Principal Diagnosis Coding: Mastering Selection and Sequencing. Join our expert-led webcast to conquer the challenges of principal diagnosis selection and sequencing. We’ll decode the intricacies of ICD-10-CM guidelines, equipping you with a clear grasp of the rules and the official UHDDS principal diagnosis definition. Uncover the crucial role of coding conventions, master the sequencing of related conditions, and confidently tackle cases with equally valid principal diagnoses.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
September 14, 2023
2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

2024 IPPS Summit: Final Rule Update with Expert Insights and Analysis

Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY24 Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) Final Rule, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, plus insights, analysis and answers to questions from the country’s most respected subject matter experts.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

2024 IPPS Summit Day 3: MS-DRG Shifts and NTAPs

This third session in our 2024 IPPS Summit will feature a review of FY24 changes to the MS-DRG methodology and new technology add-on payments (NTAPs), presented by senior healthcare consultant Laurie Johnson, with bonus insights and analysis from two acclaimed subject matter experts

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
August 17, 2023

Trending News