Why Are Patient Appeals More Common Than Expected?

Why Are Patient Appeals More Common Than Expected?

As required by their Statement of Work, Livanta, the Beneficiary and Family Centered Care-Quality Improvement Organization (BFCC-QIO) for regions 2, 3, 5, 7, and 9, published their annual report for the 2022 calendar year (CY). As a reminder, the BFCC-QIO is charged by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) with “improving healthcare services and protecting beneficiaries through efficient statutory review functions, including quality-of-care reviews for Medicare beneficiaries.”

As recently discussed in other RACmonitor articles, Livanta also performs other duties for CMS, including short-stay inpatient admission reviews and high-weighted DRG reviews, but those tasks are not included in this report.

The first message from Livanta’s report is that patient appeals are much more common than one might expect. They note that they handled over 200,000 hospital discharge and post-acute service termination appeals in 2022 as one of two BFCC-QIOs. If Kepro receives a similar number, that means over 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries file an appeal every single day, encompassing hospitals, skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), home health agencies, hospices, and comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation facilities.

Looking closer at the data, a few findings stand out.

First, it appears that the pre-admission Hospital Issued Notice of Non-Coverage, the HINN 1, is used very infrequently. Patients are encouraged to appeal when given the HINN 1, yet Livanta received only 208 appeals in 2022, with nearly 80 percent coming from Region 2, consisting of New York, New Jersey, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Of those 208 HINN 1 appeals, Livanta agreed with the provider almost 84 percent of the time.

The HINN 10, the notice used when the hospital utilization staff determines that ongoing inpatient care is not necessary, but the physician will not discharge the patient (so they asked Livanta to make the decision) was also uncommon, occurring 111 times, with Livanta siding with the hospital over 78 percent of the time.

On the other end of the appeal spectrum lies the bulk of the work done by Livanta.

Although the percentage varies by region, about 62 percent of the appeals were filed by Medicare Advantage (MA) beneficiaries over the discontinuation of their care at a SNF, the coverage of home care services, or coverage of care at a comprehensive rehabilitation facility (CORF). These are also known as Grijalva appeals, named after the lawsuit that led to the requirement that a process be developed to give these patients appeal rights. Unfortunately, Livanta does not break down the statistics, but one can speculate that the majority of the appeals would be of SNF and home care services.

Looking at Region 5, which encompasses Illinois, Minnesota, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio, as an example, there were 52,834 appeals of termination of home care, SNF, or CORF care by Medicare Advantage patients, but only 9,457 appeals of termination of the same services by patients with traditional Medicare. This likely reflects the tight oversight that MA plans have when their enrollees are admitted to a SNF to determine coverage on a nearly daily basis, compared to traditional Medicare, wherein the facility makes its own determination of when the Part A stay is no longer necessary.

Back to hospital appeals – the number of patients who appealed their discharge, as described in the Important Message from Medicare (IMM) presented to every inpatient, was similar across Medicare and Medicare Advantage patients, with a total of 40,146 appeals filed. For these appeals, Livanta agreed with the facility on the discharge 86.8 percent of the time. Interestingly, patients in Region 7, encompassing Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, and Nebraska, seemed drastically less likely to appeal their discharge, although this may be simply due to their drastically smaller population, compared to other regions.

Livanta also addresses quality-of-care concerns submitted by Medicare beneficiaries. While they provide ample data, little of it is directly actionable, as it is too non-specific. What is clear is that in every region, the most common concern was “apparently did not establish and/or develop an appropriate treatment plan for a defined problem or diagnosis (that) prompted this episode of care (excludes laboratory and/or imaging, procedures and consultations).” Of the many quality-of-care concerns, overall, in less than 13 percent of the appeals was the concern confirmed by the Livanta reviewer. 

How does Livanta establish what the appropriate quality of care is? In every diagnostic category for which they provide data, they use UpToDate as their reference. Livanta justifies the use of UpToDate by noting that it “is a comprehensive resource consisting of peer-reviewed, physician-authored articles on thousands of clinical topics. Its review articles are continuously updated by incorporating new evidence from hundreds of medical journals, and cited evidence is graded on its strength and quality. Unlike similar repositories that are designed to be used quickly at the point of care, UpToDate articles generally include more thorough explanations of both the foundations and nuances of their topics.”

As with most statistical reports, the interpretation of data is often influenced by the perspective of the person reviewing it. In this case, it appears first that Livanta does not simply sit around and collect money from a lucrative CMS contract. They clearly work hard for their money. It also seems that for the most part, providers are doing right by patients, winning most appeals.

But perhaps the message should be that while providers are generally making the right decisions about care, perhaps a better job needs to be done communicating with patients about their medical benefits and their medical care.

I am sure every provider would love to provide, and every patient would love to receive, unlimited care to every patient at no cost to anyone, but that is not the reality of our healthcare system. We must work with within the system we have.

If you are interested to see the statistics for your region and state, you can find the reports at https://livantaqio.com/en/About/Annual_Report.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, ACPA-C, CHCQM, CHRI

Ronald Hirsch, MD, is vice president of the Regulations and Education Group at R1 Physician Advisory Services. Dr. Hirsch’s career in medicine includes many clinical leadership roles at healthcare organizations ranging from acute-care hospitals and home health agencies to long-term care facilities and group medical practices. In addition to serving as a medical director of case management and medical necessity reviewer throughout his career, Dr. Hirsch has delivered numerous peer lectures on case management best practices and is a published author on the topic. He is a member of the Advisory Board of the American College of Physician Advisors, and the National Association of Healthcare Revenue Integrity, a member of the American Case Management Association, and a Fellow of the American College of Physicians. Dr. Hirsch is a member of the RACmonitor editorial board and is regular panelist on Monitor Mondays. The opinions expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views, policies, or opinions of R1 RCM, Inc. or R1 Physician Advisory Services (R1 PAS).

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Navigating AI in Healthcare Revenue Cycle: Maximizing Efficiency, Minimizing Risks

Navigating AI in Healthcare Revenue Cycle: Maximizing Efficiency, Minimizing Risks

Michelle Wieczorek explores challenges, strategies, and best practices to AI implementation and ongoing monitoring in the middle revenue cycle through real-world use cases. She addresses critical issues such as the validation of AI algorithms, the importance of human validation in machine learning, and the delineation of responsibilities between buyers and vendors.

May 21, 2024
Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Leveraging the CERT: A New Coding and Billing Risk Assessment Plan

Frank Cohen shows you how to leverage the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing Program (CERT) to create your own internal coding and billing risk assessment plan, including granular identification of risk areas and prioritizing audit tasks and functions resulting in decreased claim submission errors, reduced risk of audit-related damages, and a smoother, more efficient reimbursement process from Medicare.

April 9, 2024
2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

2024 Observation Services Billing: How to Get It Right

Dr. Ronald Hirsch presents an essential “A to Z” review of Observation, including proper use for Medicare, Medicare Advantage, and commercial payers. He addresses the correct use of Observation in medical patients and surgical patients, and how to deal with the billing of unnecessary Observation services, professional fee billing, and more.

March 21, 2024
Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets

Explore the top-10 federal audit targets for 2024 in our webcast, “Top-10 Compliance Risk Areas for Hospitals & Physicians in 2024: Get Ahead of Federal Audit Targets,” featuring Certified Compliance Officer Michael G. Calahan, PA, MBA. Gain insights and best practices to proactively address risks, enhance compliance, and ensure financial well-being for your healthcare facility or practice. Join us for a comprehensive guide to successfully navigating the federal audit landscape.

February 22, 2024
2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment

2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment

Dive deep into the world of Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) coding with our comprehensive webcast. Explore the latest OPPS codes for 2024, understand SDoH assessments, and discover effective strategies for integrating coding seamlessly into healthcare practices. Gain invaluable insights and practical knowledge to navigate the complexities of SDoH coding confidently. Join us to unlock the potential of coding in promoting holistic patient care.

May 22, 2024
2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Coding Clinic Update Webcast Series

HIM coding expert, Kay Piper, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, reviews the guidance and updates coders and CDIs on important information in each of the AHA’s 2024 ICD-10-CM/PCS Quarterly Coding Clinics in easy-to-access on-demand webcasts, available shortly after each official publication.

April 15, 2024

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

Happy World Health Day! Our exclusive webcast, ‘2024 SDoH Update: Navigating Coding and Screening Assessment,’  is just $99 for a limited time! Use code WorldHealth24 at checkout.

SPRING INTO SAVINGS! Get 21% OFF during our exclusive two-day sale starting 3/21/2024. Use SPRING24 at checkout to claim this offer. Click here to learn more →