It happens more often than you might expect.
One topic I often speak about is patient notices. Don’t we all love them? We all know no one really reads them until something goes wrong, and then you better be darn certain you did it right.
Recently I discovered something very interesting about one of the outpatient service notices. If you provide an Advance Beneficiary Notice of Non-coverage (ABN) to a Medicare patient for an outpatient service that you have determined does not meet Medicare coverage guidelines and they sign it, agreeing to pay, the billers will place a -GA modifier on the claim – informing the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) that the hospital does not feel this is a covered service, that the patient agreed to pay, and that a signed ABN is on file at the hospital.
Well, it turns out that even with that -GA modifier, over 90 percent of those claims are actually paid by the MAC without any manual review at all.
Really? The provider does not think it is a covered service, the patient agrees to pay the full price for the service, and the MAC still pays it? While there are edits in place to deny claims with -GY and -GZ, indicating that the hospital does not expect payment and the patient will not be held liable, there is no edit for -GA.
First, this seems like a big waste of Medicare Trust Fund money. In 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Office of Inspector General (OIG) audited payments for -GA claims and found that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) had paid out over $700 million in such claims; the OIG subsequently told CMS to fix this. But it seems that nothing has been done, at least from my anecdotal information. How can the MACs justify simply paying these claims? Did they do a cost/benefit analysis and determine that it would cost more to perform claim reviews that would be saved?
Yet there are two other sides to this that should be noted. When an ABN is completed, the provider indicates the chargemaster price for the service, and that is what the patient agrees to pay. When the MAC pays it, the hospital gets the Medicare rate for the service, likely a small fraction of the chargemaster rate. So, hospitals are losing money they would have been paid. Sure, chargemaster rates are inflated, as required by CMS regulations, but if the patient agrees, shouldn’t the hospital have the opportunity to collect the payment?
The other issue is an ethical and compliance issue. If the hospital knows that the service is not covered and submits a claim indicating as such, by use of the -GA modifier, and then the claim gets paid without any indication that the claim underwent a manual review, can the provider keep the money? Are they not in receipt of an improper payment? Are they allowed to justify keeping the payment by knowing they properly used the -GA modifier, and therefore they are held harmless – and the MAC would be the one to face consequences for “improperly” paying the claim (if MACs actually faced consequences at all?)
Any compliance officers want to comment? What would you do?
Programming note: Listen when Dr. Ronald Hirsch makes his Monday Rounds live on Monitor Mondays with Chuck Buck, 10 Eastern, and sponsored by R1-RCM.
Literature is ripe with classic phrases that seem timelessly apropos. For example, take the partial federal government shutdown. For days, the phrase repeated in the
The Medicare Advantage (MA) program has grown significantly over the past two decades, becoming a popular alternative to traditional Medicare fee-for-service (FFS). As of 2023,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
