A third of unvaccinated Americans were unsure if their insurance covered the vaccine.
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act passed last spring prohibits providers from charging patients for COVID vaccinations, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) doubled down by requiring providers to sign an agreement that they won’t do so. Commercial insurance and government plans are required to pay for any fees to providers for administering the shots, and the government has set up a fund through the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), through which providers can get reimbursed for uninsured patients. In short, under a number of laws and programs, individuals should not be paying anything to get vaccinated.
However, a recent Kaiser Family Foundation survey found that a third of unvaccinated Americans were unsure if their insurance covered the vaccine, leading U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Xavier Becerra to write a letter to both providers and payors, reminding them that patients should not be charged.
According to the New York Times, it’s not clear that any substantial number of patients have actually been charged and then subsequently paid for a vaccination. But Becerra and others are worried about the perception of possible costs, which may be one factor that keeps individuals from getting the vaccine. According to researchers quoted in the Times, this perception reflects a general distrust in the health system, based on experiences with unexpected medical bills.
On a related note, for one group of Americans, the vaccine is quickly becoming a requirement for employment. Hospital systems across the country – including New York-Presbyterian and New Jersey’s RWJBarnabas – are requiring their employees to become vaccinated before September or find another job.
Houston Methodist was one of the first hospitals to require employees to be vaccinated. A group of that hospital’s employees filed suit last month against the requirement, citing the fact that while the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved vaccines for emergency use, they had not been fully approved. Over this past weekend, a federal judge dismissed the lawsuit, saying that the hospital’s decision to mandate vaccinations for its employees was consistent with public policy.
As health systems move toward requiring employees to be vaccinated, hospitals must also implement the long-awaited COVID safety standards released on Friday by OSHA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration.
The standards, which only apply to hospitals, nursing homes, and other healthcare workplaces, now mandate many of the safety precautions that have been in place for over a year, including the use of personal protective Equipment (PPE), social distancing and masking, ventilation requirements, and daily employee health screenings. The difference now, however, is that hospital are required to implement these protections.
The new OSHA hospital rules do say that fully vaccinated workers are exempt from masking and social distancing when they are in “well-defined areas where there is no reasonable expectation that any person with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 will be present.”
While the new OSHA rules do not apply to workplaces outside healthcare settings, OSHA did update its guidance for other workplaces, and that guidance reflects the CDC’s most recent recommendations for vaccinated individuals.
In such workplaces, OSHA suggests, employers no longer need to take steps to protect vaccinated employees. Vaccinated employees no longer need to wear masks or practice social distancing, but unvaccinated and high-risk employees must continue to do so.
This poses something of a problem, because neither OSHA nor the CDC have given guidance about workplaces in which the employer does not know which employees have been vaccinated – and to date, only a small percentage of employers track any such metrics. So, how should employers in those situations apply protective policies in a mixed vaccinated workforce?
It will be interesting to see whether this new OSHA guidance will push more employers to ask their employees whether they’ve been vaccinated – or, like Houston Methodist and other hospitals, make vaccinations a requirement of employment.
Programming Note: Listen to Matthew Albright’s live reporting on legislative issues, every Monday on Monitor Mondays at 10 Eastern and sponsored by Zelis.
EDITOR’S NOTE Day 3 of the federal shutdown continues. This article by Mark Spivey is part of a special section today published by RACmonitor and
As expected, the federal shutdown began early Wednesday morning. What’s unknown is how long it will continue. Neither congressional Republicans nor Democrats appear to be
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
