Updates on COVID-19 Billing and CS Modifier Audits

The pandemic continues to impact Medicare reimbursement.

COVID-19 continues to make news on the regulatory front with two new directives from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), centering on testing for the deadly coronavirus and formal coding edits for the Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) on payments with the CS modifier.

There’s a new payment structure from CMS for high-throughput COVID-19 testing, according to Ronald Hirsch, MD, who made the announcement this week on the Monitor Mondays weekly Internet radio broadcast.

“The testing for COVID-19 can be done as a point-of-care test, where the sample is taken and tested immediately, but it can also be collected and sent to a laboratory, where testing is performed and the results reported back to the provider at a later time,” Hirsch said – noting that currently, CMS pays $100 for this test.

Hirsch added that CMS announced that beginning Jan. 1, if the test results are not available to the provider within two calendar days of the specimen being collected, then the payment will be $75.

“The laboratory will need to report not only the code for the test itself, but also its use of an add-on code, U0005, to indicate that the results were provided within two calendar days,” Hirsch told audience members. “As far as I know, this is the first time that CMS has used a payment structure based on the timing of the results.”

According to Hirsch, either CMS is penalizing laboratories that cannot produce fast results by only paying $75 compared to the $100 they now receive, or the agency has made a global payment adjustment and is now rewarding labs that can produce results quickly.

“Either way, it will be interesting to watch if this is a single use of this payment structure, or whether we will see it adopted for other services in the future,” Hirsch said.

In another development, Hirsch reported on the release of formal coding edits for MACs on payment for services reported with the CS modifier. The CS modifier is placed on evaluation and management (E&M) services for COVID-19 visits, resulting in Medicare paying 100 percent of the allowed amount, rather than the usual 80 percent.

Hirsch said that there has been significant confusion about when this modifier should be used, noting that many providers have attached the CS modifier to any service provided during the visit, including X-rays and other diagnostic tests.

“So now the problem is, what will happen to services that had the CS modifier inappropriately (applied) and were paid at 100 percent prior to these edits being put in the system?” Hirsch said. “Will the MACs go back to the beginning of the public health emergency (PHE) and adjust all of those claims, and recoup the extra 20 percent that they paid, or will it be the responsibility of the provider to go back through all of these and refund that 20 percent?”

Hirsch also wondered aloud whether, if the 20 percent is refunded or recouped, how does the claim then get submitted to any secondary insurance for coverage?

“If hospitals start billing patients for that balance, there is certainly going to be a lot of confusion and anger,” Hirsch warned. “Furthermore, if the MACs do not recoup it and the hospitals do not refund it, will CMS give the Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs) permission to audit claims for this?”

Hirsch noted that if RACs do so, such action would represent a potential windfall for them, since it’s an automated review and would be certain to find many overpayments.

In the meantime, Hirsch urged those working in revenue integrity to review their facility’s use of the CS modifier in the early days and see if they are at risk.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Chuck Buck

Chuck Buck is the publisher of RACmonitor and is the program host and executive producer of Monitor Monday.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24