Are you part of the problem or the solution?
EDITOR’S NOTE: In a two-part series, physician-attorney Dr. John K. Hall will explore routine findings that may make you reconsider your role in compliance malfeasance.
Many of us review records regularly. The purpose of our reviews relates to aspects of revenue cycle, utilization, quality, or occasionally, peer review.
Our view of the services provided by our organizations is shaped by our reviews of the record. We suspect who might be a good provider based on the completeness of the record and the ability of a provider to lead us through their thought process, to diagnostic or therapeutic success. Many of us are unsurprised by denials and audits. As we review records, some of us wonder why we don’t see more denials and audits.
One of the possibilities we are forced to consider is the possibility of wrongdoing. That’s what I want to talk about in this two-part series.
Let’s stop for a moment and consider the nature of fraud. If you Google
“CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) and fraud” together, it takes less than half a second to return over 20 million hits.
The first hit is invariably an advertisement for a whistleblower law firm, telling you if you properly report Medicare fraud, you may be entitled to a significant whistleblower reward. The ad will often claim that Medicare fraud is the largest area of fraud committed against the government, and that 10 percent of claims are fraudulent.
Further down in the results will be an MLN document from January 2021. This will tell you that fraud “typically” involves a range of activities related to Medicare claims, provider referrals, and provider relationships. Crucially, each of the described activities includes the words “knowingly.” That single word shapes the rest of our discussion. In legal terms, “knowingly” means that someone has actual knowledge of the prohibited nature of the actions, acts in deliberate ignorance of the prohibited behavior, or acts in reckless disregard of the prohibited behavior.
Essentially, “knowingly” means that someone realized what he or she was doing, was aware of the nature of the conduct, and did not act through mistake or accident. That being said, the law generally requires no proof of specific intent to defraud. In other words, fraud may be a byproduct of other intentional actions.
Next, we need to look to the False Claims Act, or FCA. This is the most common law under which healthcare fraud is charged. To violate the FCA, a person must have submitted, or caused the submission of, the false claim “with knowledge of the falsity.” There’s that pesky knowledge requirement again.
As we review these records, it’s the patterns we notice. In particular, it’s templated language such as “this patient presents for TKA after a minimum of six months of aggressive yet appropriate, conservative, non-operative therapy, including physical therapy, weight reduction, and assistive devices. The pain continues to limit activities of daily life, as well as the patient’s general enjoyment of life.”
That is actual language from several hundred records, by the way. I’m sure you noticed that there’s no reference to the side – or the patient’s gender.
The question we all ask is, is this real? Is this valid? Is this even good medicine? These are the questions we’ll address in the second part of this series, along with your liability.
Compliance teams get nervous when rules are not followed. And when an expired form is used, they get really nervous. Thankfully, there is one fewer
When you engage an expert, it can become easy to think, “Now I don’t have to do anything myself; I can rely on their wisdom!”
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Sepsis sequencing continues to challenge even experienced coding and CDI professionals, with evolving guidelines, documentation gaps, and payer scrutiny driving denials and data inconsistencies. In this webcast, Payal Sinha, MBA, RHIA, CCDS, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, CCDS-O, CRC, CRCR, provides clear guideline-based strategies to accurately code sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock, assign POA indicators, clarify the relationship between infection and organ dysfunction, and align documentation across teams. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen audit defensibility, improve first-pass accuracy, support appeal success, reduce denials, and ensure accurate quality reporting, empowering organizations to achieve consistent, compliant sepsis coding outcomes.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
In this timely session, Stacey Shillito, CDIP, CPMA, CCS, CCS-P, CPEDC, COPC, breaks down the complexities of Medical Decision Making (MDM) documentation so providers can confidently capture the true complexity of their care. Attendees will learn practical, efficient strategies to ensure documentation aligns with current E/M guidelines, supports accurate coding, and reduces audit risk, all without adding to charting time.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
