Understanding your Readmissions: How to Reduce Penalties

Readmissions affect 18.2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries.

Hospitals already suffering from the financial hemorrhage of the COVID-19 pandemic will be hit again by the readmission penalty. More than 2,500, or 83 percent of hospitals in the U.S., will receive reduced Medicare funding for the 2021 fiscal year because of their readmissions from 2016 to 2019.

The penalty per hospital is up to 3 percent, and is dependent on the percentage of readmissions that the facility exceeded, per Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements. CMS continues to include the following six conditions for 30-day unplanned readmission measures: acute myocardial infarction (AMI), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), heart failure, pneumonia, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), and elective hip or knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA). The 30-day readmission period was chosen by lawmakers as a proposed timeframe that readmissions could be attributed to hospital care. The intent of this timeframe is for hospitals to have processes and resources in place to manage patients post-hospitalization.

The Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP) was created by CMS and put into effect on Oct. 1, 2012, as a progressive effort to encourage value-based measures in our healthcare systems. Readmissions affect 18.2 percent of Medicare beneficiaries, and cost Medicare between $15-17 billion per year. In 2015, Medicare created the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program (VBP), which includes the Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB). MSPB evaluates the Medicare Part A and B spending for patients three days prior and 30 days after inpatient hospital admissions; thus, a hospital readmission of any cause impacts a hospital’s MSPB ratio. In fact, many commercial payers have followed suit, and have included some type of language in contracts regarding reduced payment or monitoring of hospital readmissions, with penalties as high as full denial of payment for the readmission. 

Reports suggest that about 25-40 percent of readmissions are preventable, highlighting the percentage of patients with chronic conditions that warrant appropriate rehospitalization. Nonetheless, the quest for creative thinking in our push for value asks health systems to think creatively in how to handle these patients. Hospitals need to evaluate how they can financially maintain as much of their payments as possible during a time when revenue is being pulled back from all areas (and during a pandemic, when elective procedures are at an all-time low). This will require an eye on process improvement, front-end quality, and revenue management to avoid back-end layoffs or broad-stoke cost-cutting measures. 

Focus on What You Can Control
Hospitals often track and trend exhaustive amounts of generic data without attributing the appropriate questions of “why am I tracking this?” and “how can I make these data points move?” All readmissions should be evaluated first, labeled as preventable or non-preventable. Then work groups should dive deeper into the preventable readmissions by breaking them down by the time they returned to hospital, discharge disposition, referral source, and the attributing categories for each readmission. Once each category is put together, look for the trends and determine actionable steps that can impact the readmissions. Put any questions that the data creates, pertaining to a front-end process, with case management, asking key questions at the time of discharge for initial hospitalizations and for the assessments during readmission.

Look at Your Readmissions of Fewer than Seven Days
Per CMS guidelines, hospitals are expected to have a mechanism to evaluate readmissions that occur within 30 days. Research tells us that readmissions occurring within seven days of the index admission were likely hospital-related and preventable. Such readmissions should be reviewed by case management and hospital leadership as an opportunity to improve physician decision-making, post-surgical infection rates, discharge planning from inpatient care to outpatient care, management of symptoms after discharge, and patient follow-through with appointments. How comfortable was the patient with the transitional plan put in place? Will this key conversation and assurance at time of discharge ensure greater success? Interventions should be targeted at patients within the first week of discharge, and the implementation of an outpatient case management plan should focus on populations at high risk for readmission. 

Do Your Research before Investing in Costly Programs
Harriette, G.C., et al, (February 2017) found in their comprehensive network meta-analysis published in the European Journal of Heart Failure that home nurse visits, disease management clinics, and care management programs made the greatest impact to reduce mortality and readmission rates for heart-failure patients. Research tells us that getting a patient in with their PCP within 5-7 days post-discharge will help avoid a return to the hospital. We also know that the highest percentage of avoidable readmissions come through admission requests by emergency room physicians. The meta-analysis from Harriette, G.C. et al also found that singular interventions such as education at discharge, telephone support, or telemonitoring did not make any difference in preventing readmissions. Rather, the recommendation is a comprehensive program that includes face-face connection with the patient – or, in today’s times, at least videoconferencing to see the patient and what their home situation looks like. We also know that social determinants of health (SDoH) have a large impact on readmissions and high utilization. The recommendation is to include SDOH questions in all case management assessments to determine risk factors and ways to counteract societal issues that patients face.

Use Strategy and Community Partners to Tackle Preventable Readmissions
Most electronic medical records (EMRs) and case management departments should already include or be familiar with the key components to identify, alert, and hand off patients at high risk of readmission to outpatient case manager counterparts, ideally while the patient is still hospitalized. A proficient inpatient case management program should work closely with the hospitalist and physician teams to create an assessment and transitional care plan that decreases the risk of readmission. A case management team that is trained to identify at-risk populations will help decrease the risk of readmission by addressing issues during the hospitalization. Creating a program in which the outpatient case managers communicate with the inpatient case managers during hospitalization to collaborate as a team with the patient will ensure a safe transition at discharge. Outpatient case managers do not necessarily have to be funded at the cost of the hospital; most Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), home health providers, and public health partners now have case management programs in place that can assist hospitals in the handoff process. 

In addition to all other stressors, 83 percent of hospitals nationwide are losing additional revenue for their Medicare payments from October 2020 to September 2021 because of CMS’s readmission reduction program. Readmissions ripple into MSPB, Medicare shared savings, bundle payments, and commercial reimbursement. Understanding the financial impact and how your health system is creating outcome-driven results to mitigate these factors will not only ensure survival, but improve patient quality.  

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn

Marie Stinebuck, MBA, MSN, ACM

Marie Stinebuck has been a nurse for 25 years with 13 years of experience in case management and more than a decade in hospital case management leadership. Her roles have included leadership of teams in case management, utilization review, denials management, clinical documentation. Marie holds an MBA and a master's in nursing leadership. She currently has an active role on the American Case Management Association board.

Related Stories

Leave a Reply

Please log in to your account to comment on this article.

Featured Webcasts

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Mastering Principal Diagnosis: Coding Precision, Medical Necessity, and Quality Impact

Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.

December 3, 2025

Proactive Denial Management: Data-Driven Strategies to Prevent Revenue Loss

Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.

November 25, 2025
Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis: Bridging the Clinical Documentation and Coding Gap to Reduce Denials

Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.

September 24, 2025

Trending News

Featured Webcasts

AI in Claims Auditing: Turning Compliance Risks into Defensible Systems

As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.

January 13, 2026
Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Surviving Federal Audits for Inpatient Rehab Facility Services

Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.

November 13, 2025
E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

E/M Services Under Intensive Federal Scrutiny: Navigating Split/Shared, Incident-to & Critical Care Compliance in 2025-2026

During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.

August 26, 2025

Trending News

Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25

CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24