Concern about hospitals sharing space has caused angst for several years. But as reiterated by Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) official David Wright, the Director of the Quality Safety and Oversight Group at CMS, that concern is unnecessary.
Before focusing on that issue, I want to steal a page from my friend Dr. Ronald Hirsch, who has annually named his “Hirsch’s Heroes” – individuals in the healthcare industry he feels deserve being singled out for praise and recognition. This is just a one-time deal, but I would like to name Mr. Wright as “David’s Hero.” At the American Health Lawyers Association conference in Baltimore last week, Mr. Wright spoke about hospital surveys. He is everything I would hope for in a regulator. He is practical, striking exactly the right balance between patient safety and administrative burden. He is also committed to transparency. His session contained several things worth discussing.
You may remember that in May 2019, CMS issued draft guidance about situations in which two hospitals or a hospital and a clinic shared space. The draft guidance was extraordinarily complicated, indicating that having patients walk in the hallway through the space of one hospital to get to space for another hospital was potentially problematic.
The guidance caused quite a stir. Ultimately, common sense prevailed, and the final guidance issued in November 2021 is quite straightforward. Despite being several pages long, I think you can boil it down to two sentences. First, “each hospital is responsible for meeting all the conditions of participation. If the hospital shares space with another facility, it may not try to avoid a citation by claiming the problem is the other guy’s fault.” That policy seems quite fair to me, and very easy to explain.
Mr. Wright offered a few other tidbits. Did you know that you can watch all of the educational videos that CMS surveyors are trained with? If you work in a facility like a hospital or a skilled nursing facility (SNF) visited by surveyors, you may wish to check out the website, https://qsep.cms.gov/welcome.aspx.
David also mentioned that President Biden’s current proposed budget would result in several facility surveys that are currently kept private becoming public. As noted, Mr. Wright is a proponent of transparency, wanting to ensure the public can see both the results of governmental surveys and that the healthcare industry has insight into how the agency is monitoring them.
After Mr. Wright finished his presentation, another lawyer spent about 30 minutes going through scenarios in which hospitals were sharing space. While technically, I agree with the lawyer’s conclusions, I nevertheless was troubled by the presentation. In my opinion, spending 30 minutes analyzing scenarios is obfuscation, not simplification. The draft guidance suggested there could be risks associated with sharing space. I thought that the draft guidance went far beyond the authority of the regulations. If that guidance had been finalized as drafted, there would be reason for carefully scrutinizing it. But the final version was radically different. As finalized, the guidance treats shared space the same way all other space is treated: a hospital is on the hook for events in the shared space, exactly as it is when the space is unshared.
There are definitely times I have expressed frustration with oversight. But I readily acknowledge that it is essential, and also that there are times it’s really well done. David Wright is well-named because he is literally “Mr. Right” when it comes to oversight. If you have a situation where you think CMS’s position with respect to certification is wrong, calling Mr. Wright could be a good strategy. He will be thoughtful and fair. But I want to emphasize a key point. Calling CMS when you have determined that the agency’s position is imposing an unreasonable burden is wise. But that is very different from calling CMS to ask about their position on a matter.
When trying to determine the state of the law, it is essential to do research into the statutes and regulations and consider any policy statements. Some lawyers think that “research” consists of calling a helpful government official and asking for their thoughts. That is not research; it is laziness. You can call the government without paying a lawyer! If your counsel answers questions by calling CMS, you either need a new lawyer or, if you are fine with doing whatever the government says, no lawyer at all. There are two big takeaways from Mr. Wright’s session. First, we should all be grateful to him for his willingness to come present at conferences, and for his wisdom. Second, there are lawyers who are willing to overcomplicate issues. If you have one of them, you will lose much of the benefit received from the reasonable approach offered by CMS.
Literature is ripe with classic phrases that seem timelessly apropos. For example, take the partial federal government shutdown. For days, the phrase repeated in the
The Medicare Advantage (MA) program has grown significantly over the past two decades, becoming a popular alternative to traditional Medicare fee-for-service (FFS). As of 2023,
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Join Beth Wolf, MD, CPC, CCDS, for an in-depth webcast on the FY2025 spinal fusion MS-DRG updates. Discover key changes in DRG classification, understand impacts on documentation and CMI, and learn strategies to ensure compliance.
Join Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, as she presents effective strategies to strengthen collaboration between CDI, coding, and quality departments in acute care hospitals. Angela will also share guidance on implementing cross-departmental meetings, using shared KPIs, and engaging leadership to foster a culture of collaboration. Attendees will gain actionable tools to optimize documentation accuracy, elevate quality metrics, and drive a unified approach to healthcare goals, ultimately enhancing both patient outcomes and organizational performance.
Optimize your outpatient clinical documentation and gain comprehensive knowledge from foundational practices to advanced technologies, ensuring improved patient care and organizational and financial success. This webcast bundle provides a holistic approach to outpatient CDI, empowering you to implement best practices from the ground up and leverage advanced strategies for superior results. You will gain actionable insights to improve documentation quality, patient care, compliance, and financial outcomes.
Enhancing outpatient clinical documentation is crucial for maintaining accuracy, compliance, and proper reimbursement in today’s complex healthcare environment. This webcast, presented by industry expert Angela Comfort, DBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, will provide you with actionable strategies to tackle complex challenges in outpatient documentation. You’ll learn how to craft detailed clinical narratives, utilize advanced EHR features, and implement accurate risk adjustment and HCC coding. The session also covers essential regulatory updates to keep your documentation practices compliant. Join us to gain the tools you need to improve documentation quality, support better patient care, and ensure financial integrity.
Dr. Ronald Hirsch provides critical details on the new Medicare Appeal Process for Status Changes for patients whose status changes during their hospital stay. He also delves into other scenarios of hospital patients receiving custodial care or medically unnecessary services where patient notifications may be needed along with the processes necessary to ensure compliance with state and federal guidance.
Healthcare organizations face complex regulatory requirements under the No Surprises Act and Price Transparency rules. These policies mandate extensive fee disclosures across settings, and confusion is widespread—many hospitals remain unaware they must post every contracted rate. Non-compliance could lead to costly penalties, financial loss, and legal risks. Join David M. Glaser Esq. as he shows you how to navigate these regulations effectively.
Protect your facility from unwanted audits! Join Becky Jacobsen, BSN, RN, MBS, CCS-P, CPC, CPEDC, CBCS, CEMC, and take a deep dive into both the CMS and AMA guidelines for reporting post operative pain blocks. You’ll learn how to determine if the nerve block is separately codable with real life examples for better understanding. Becky will also cover how to evaluate whether documentation supports medical necessity, offer recommendations for stronger documentation practices, and provide guidance on educating providers about documentation requirements. She’ll include a discussion of appropriate modifier and diagnosis coding assignment so that you can be confident that your billing of post operative pain blocks is fully supported and compliant.
During this RACmonitor webcast Dr. Ronald Hirsch spotlights the areas of the OIG’s Work Plan and the findings of their most recent audits that impact utilization review, case management, and audit staff. He also provides his common-sense interpretation of the prevailing regulations related to those target issues. You’ll walk away better equipped with strategies to put in place immediately to reduce your risk of paybacks, increased scrutiny, and criminal penalties.
Copyright © 2024 RACmonitor. Powered by MedLearn Media.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
