An oncology practice I work with recently called with a challenging question: what do we do with a patient who acted in a threatening manner? This particular patient grabbed a doctor’s arm and pulled them out the room saying, “you and I, we are both _____” (fill the blank with an extremely derogatory racial epithet.) The patient told the physician to get the “$%##@” out of the room. The patient then struck walls, tables, and other inanimate objects, and mentioned that they had a gun in the car and speculated about retrieving it. This particular patient wasn’t receiving chemotherapy, but let’s say they were. What should the clinic do?
The conventional wisdom is that to discharge a patient, one must give them at least 30 days’ notice and make sure that they’re able to receive emergency care. There’s a good reason for that: medical organizations have a duty to patients. Abandoning the patient can create real malpractice risk. And when you consider that a patient’s outburst can be the result of a medical condition, the need for that duty becomes particularly clear. But we also have a duty to staff. Staff have a right to a safe working environment. This is one of those situations where the two duties are in direct conflict.
There isn’t an easy answer to this.
I find myself going through a checklist of sorts. Are there steps we can take to lower the risk to our staff? For example, is it possible to have security present during a visit? Is there a reason to believe that mental health treatment might help the patient? Is there a way to treat the patient and keep your staff safe? The answer may depend in part on the size and makeup of your organization. Larger health systems should have more resources for security than a smaller clinic. But in all cases, it is important to consider the patient’s mental health. Failure to do so definitely creates the potential for a legitimate malpractice claim.
While some parts of this decision-making process are extraordinarily difficult, there are also some parts that are very clear. Perhaps the clearest and most important is to make sure your actions are intellectually consistent. One question may initially seem hard: should you call the police? To me, this is one of the easiest questions. If you are genuinely worried about your staff’s safety and you are discharging a patient immediately because of that fear, you’d better be reporting the patient to the police, and you probably should consider suggesting a commitment action to the local county attorney. Obviously, reporting a patient to the police should be a last resort. Patients have a right to confidentiality, such that in most states, if a patient confesses a past crime to a medical professional, you can’t disclose that. In most cases, you can’t even confirm someone is a patient. But situations in which the patient presents an ongoing danger to themselves or others are different. You can breach confidentiality if there is a reasonable fear of harm.
Now it’s possible, or even probable, that your complaint will be ignored. But if anyone challenges your discharge of the patient, the first question a smart lawyer will ask you is whether you reported the patient. If you didn’t, the argument that you thought the patient was a serious threat will sound deeply disingenuous.
I also recommend being extraordinarily accurate and concrete in your descriptions. Rather than describing behavior as ” threatening” or “scary,” describe exactly what the individual said or did. Don’t exaggerate, and try to use exact quotes when possible. For example, while the statement “I have a gun in my car and I may go get it” is certainly alarming, it isn’t a direct threat of bodily harm. The staff were understandably uncomfortable. But ideally, they would have asked “why?” After all, the patient has made the declaration. Asking the next question is unlikely to make things worse, but it can help identify the patient’s intent.
Writing the encounter is a useful exercise.
If your text description of events doesn’t sound serious enough, you may need to reconsider whether your determination that the patient is dangerous is accurate. Be careful to consider whether a patient’s race, gender, or nationality is a factor in the threat assessment. Bias can cause people to view statements as more threatening than they are.
Calling the police on a patient is a big deal. You don’t want to do it unnecessarily. And you don’t want to fail to do it when it is.
The good news is that the law offers you the space you need to make a reasoned judgment about which path to pursue.
As Congress again turns its focus to budget concerns, healthcare might be on the backburner for a while. However, two new studies examining the No
As I am sure you all recall, a month ago, RACmonitor eNews broke the story of the new Aetna policy that will pay inpatient admissions
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
