While ChatGPT has entered American culture and lexicon as quickly as the latest TikTok trend or Taylor Swift hit, how it will work long-term in everyday life is still a mystery.
Some believe it will revolutionize the way we live, learn, and work. But many, including the Biden Administration, believe that before we see what it’s capable of, we need to fully understand what it is not.
For example, one lawyer recently found out that legal research is perhaps not ChatGPT’s strong suit – when the cases cited in his AI-crafted brief turned out to be entirely made up, which he had to explain to a furious judge. And while this is merely detrimental to his client’s case, and certainly this lawyer’s reputation, this kind of false or mistaken information could be deadly in healthcare. So as AI starts to move from its traditional use in nonclinical, administrative settings to more clinical settings, let’s look at what might be in store.
While older versions of AI are already in use for things such as reading certain scans and voice-to-text records, a recent study tested the empathetic answering capability of ChatGPT with a list of 195 common patient questions posed to both the AI chatbot and a physician. A panel of physicians was then asked to blindly rate which answer to each question was superior. The judges preferred ChatGPT’s answers in 79 percent of instances; not only were they considered high-quality and empathetic, but ChatGPT’s answers were about four times longer than the physicians’ answers.
But how practical is this in a clinical setting really? It’s not a slam dunk – the same issues that plagued our unfortunate lawyer exist in this setting. ChatGPT continues to make basic mistakes in math and often includes incorrect or falsified facts in its answers.
But what it might mean for providers is assistance, particularly in the face of provider burnout and increased patient messaging stemming from the increase in telemedicine usage in recent years. A provider might really benefit from running a question from a patient through ChatGPT and then simply editing as necessary. This could free up more of the provider’s time for in-person patient care. Other suggested uses have included summarizing patients’ medical history and writing clinical care notes and discharge instructions. Many question, however, how ChatGPT interacts with issues such as patient confidentiality, bias, accessibility, and protected health information.
And what about the legislative and statutory landscape surrounding this emerging technology? The Biden Administration has certainly not steered clear of the issue, releasing an AI Bill of Rights, and incorporating acknowledgment of the risks of this technology in many of its executive actions. Recently, the Administration also asked for public input on mitigating risks of AI, and hosted a listening session with workers who use AI in their positions, including those in healthcare.
Senate Majority Leader Schumer has met with a bipartisan group of senators to begin crafting comprehensive legislation to regulate AI, coming on the heels of several congressional panel hearings – including one that saw testimony from the CEO of the company behind ChatGPT. It’s clear that a legislative response is being mounted, but specific details are currently scarce on what guardrails, if any, will be put up on the technology.
When asked about its role in the healthcare industry specifically, ChatGPT stated that it was a, quote, “groundbreaking development poised to reshape the medical landscape.” While humility might not be another of ChatGPT’s attributes, you’re unlikely to find anyone who thinks that the technology isn’t here to stay, in at least some capacity.
So, for now, the healthcare industry is teasing out the opportunities and waiting for definitive answers on the how, when, and where.
It’s two weeks into November, and still no Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) Final Rule from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Now,
The federal government may have shut down, but there has been no pause for the 340B drug pricing program. The more than 1,600 safety-net hospitals
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Learn how to navigate the proposed elimination of the Inpatient-Only list. Gain strategies to assess admission status, avoid denials, protect compliance, and address impacts across Medicare and non-Medicare payors. Essential insights for hospitals.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
