Your facility coding guidelines should be clear as to what information may be used to determine SDoH codes.
Many payers are utilizing data for the creation of policies and the development of social programs. The buzz is that the social determinants of health (SDoH) data is not being reported, so it is not available to assist in making decisions. Payors are developing programs based on what they are hearing from the public. Hospitals are also reaching out to the public to assist with housing, transportation, and food access.
These activities impact the coding function. How do coders know which of these SDoH codes to assign? Does your facility have programs in place to address the SDoH? If so, the activities should be captured in the coded data. If you are not sure, you may need to talk with various areas to determine what information would be important to capture to support the activities. The areas that may be the most involved include your boss, case management, human resources, nursing, revenue cycle, etc. Once you have determined what SDoH activities are important to your hospital and your payers, then include the information in your facility-specific coding guidelines.
Other issues include who should document SDoH information, and where to maintain this information in the chart. The April 2023 ICD-10-CM Coding and Reporting Guidelines do provide some input regarding these questions. See I.C.21.C.17 – Social Determinants of Health in the guidelines, which include the provision that clinicians other than the patient’s provider may document these conditions in the health record. Information provided directly from the patient must be co-signed by a provider. The guidelines do not specify how the information should be documented. Some organizations have used a questionnaire completed by social workers or case managers to document SDoH information. That approach raises the question of if the provider should co-sign. The guidelines also include that if there is any conflicting information, the provider should be queried. Your facility-specific coding guidelines should be clear regarding what information may be used to determine and assign SDoH codes.
If you are using this information to determine a diagnosis code, then the documentation should be part of the patient’s legal medical record. The documentation is not limited to one specific place in the medical record, but you do want the record to be consistent regarding where the information may be found.
Correct code assignment involves a team to obtain the most accurate information. The team includes nursing, case management, clinical documentation integrity, social workers, utilization review nurses, providers, and coders.
The team is important to determine if the SDoH impact the patient’s care.
Programming note: Listen to Laurie Johnson’s Coding Report Tuesdays on Talk Ten Tuesdays with Chuck Buck and Dr. Erica Remer, 10 a.m. EST.
I am sure everyone agrees that not only is providing healthcare complicated, but so are all the administrative aspects of healthcare. And as a result,
Let’s start with some updates. We have all been Program for Evaluating Payment Patterns Electronic Report (PEPPER)-free for quite a while now, but I can
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Only ICD10monitor delivers what you need: updates on must-know changes associated with the FY26 IPPS, including new ICD-10-CM/PCS codes, CCs/MCCs, and MS-DRGs, plus insights, analysis and answers to your questions from two of the country’s most respected subject matter experts.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Federal auditors are zeroing in on Inpatient Rehabilitation Facility (IRF) and hospital rehab unit services, with OIG and CERT audits leading to millions in penalties—often due to documentation and administrative errors, not quality of care. Join compliance expert Michael Calahan, PA, MBA, to learn the five clinical “pillars” of IRF-PPS admissions, key documentation requirements, and real-life case lessons to help protect your revenue.
During this essential RACmonitor webcast Michael Calahan, PA, MBA Certified Compliance Officer, will clarify the rules, dispel common misconceptions, and equip you with practical strategies to code, document, and bill high-risk split/shared, incident-to & critical care E/M services with confidence. Don’t let audit risks or revenue losses catch your organization off guard — learn exactly what federal auditors are looking for and how to ensure your documentation and reporting stand up to scrutiny.
Prepare for the 2025 CMS IPPS Final Rule with ICD10monitor’s IPPSPalooza! Click HERE to learn more
Get 15% OFF on all educational webcasts at ICD10monitor with code JULYFOURTH24 until July 4, 2024—start learning today!
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
