In considering the wording of contractual language, consider avoiding creating new problems for yourself.
A clinic recently contacted us about an insurance contract featuring a poorly written policy describing the coverage of services incident to another physician’s services.
This particular insurer began with language mirroring that of Medicare. It noted that “incident to” physician’s professional services means that health services or supplies are furnished as an integral, although incidental, part of the physician’s personal professional services, in the course of diagnosis or treatment of an illness or injury.
As an aside, I want to reiterate that when people say you can’t do new problems “incident to,” they are wrong, because they are mistakenly disregarding “course of treatment” and replacing it with “new problem.”
Those are different. But I digress.
The policy notes that an employee of the physician must render service under the physician’s direct supervision. It then says “health care professionals who are issued individual provider numbers are considered incident to the physician when performing the health services within the same encounter on the same day as the physician.”
The client wanted to know whether a healthcare professional with an individual billing number can be incident-to when providing services on a different day as the physician. That policy doesn’t directly address this. It is not written very well, and the insurer’s intent is far from clear. We were discussing this with the client when the client inquired, “should we call the insurer and ask them what they think?”
While that is certainly an option, it’s definitely not the one I would choose. I completely agree that the insurer’s policy is vague. But that ambiguity can be an advantage.
How can the insurer argue that you have broken a rule when they failed to articulate it? There is an old saying, I think it’s “don’t look a gift poorly drafted regulation in the mouth.” If a robber asks you to empty your front pockets, but not your back pockets, would you helpfully offer “don’t you want my wallet?”
Perhaps I need to apologize to any insurers who are reading for that analogy, but I do think that most insurers would agree that they have a goal of limiting their coverage.
My question: why make that easier for them? I am a staunch advocate of following the rules. But following the rules doesn’t mean you need to suggest new ones.
In this case, seeking clarification is akin to saying, “there’s a way you can my life more difficult, but you haven’t done it yet. Can I offer you some tips for really sticking it to me?”
Don’t do it.
When a policy permits the action you desire, don’t let the fact that it is poorly written trick you into giving the insurer another chance to complicate your life.
Following Congress’s recent failure (or success, depending on your political leanings) in not extending expiring tax subsidies for Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA)
Let’s start with what seems to be a never-ending topic of conversation: the new policies by Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to deny or reduce payments
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
