Two CMS initiatives continue to cause confusion among healthcare providers
EDITOR’S NOTE: The following is a summary of a broadcast segment on Monitor Monday, May 14 by the author.
Do you realize that the two-midnight rule has been the law of the land for the last four years, seven months and 14 days? And there is still widespread confusion about it. Of course, part of that continuing confusion is the inability to get straightforward answers from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on what seem to us to be straightforward questions. And of course, they changed the rule in 2015 by removing the need for certification of all admissions, and changed it again in 2016 with the case-by-case exception, and may change it a third time this year with the proposed softening of the admission order rules. I guess it is no wonder people are confused.
When I give two-midnight talks at hospitals to physicians and utilization review (UR) staff I start by telling the audience that I want the doctors to get a basic understanding of the rule and stress the importance of their documentation and I want the UR staff to be the masters of the rule. Doctors have enough on their plate trying to keep up with advances in medical care and meeting all the quality measures adopted by the many oversight agencies. Many of these quality measures, by the way, have very little actual evidence to support their use. But that’s another story.
And if physicians do try to master these admission rules, it is inevitable that the rules will once again change and then they’ll have to start all over again. So that’s why we need to provide them access to UR staff and physician advisors who can look at the case and guide them to the right status whenever they need it.
Speaking of needing help, I am also not surprised that there is also continued confusion about the status for total knee replacements. I’ve done several presentations recently and it’s tough. The orthopedists fall back on the position statement from their professional society which espoused inpatient admission as the default status, which of course CMS flatly rejected.
The orthopedists see an added burden of more documentation without any gain for them. In fact many are still upset when their judgment was questioned several years ago by being required to document medical necessity for the surgery itself. And I have heard from many hospitals where the orthopedists are just taking a stand, admitting all as inpatient, and letting the hospital deal with it.
So how should a hospital deal with that? Of course, efforts should continue to get them on board. But until that point, hospitals are obligated to follow the CMS rules even if the doctors won’t cooperate. Therefore, every admission should be reviewed during or after discharge by the UR staff and a physician advisor to determine if the patient did in fact warrant inpatient admission based on documented risks, delayed recovery or complication, need for in hospital therapy or need for skilled nursing facility care.
If inpatient admission was not warranted, an attempt could be made to change to outpatient prior to discharge by following the condition code 44 process. But most likely the physician will resist, or not even return the call. so perhaps the better plan would be to review all surgeries performed as inpatient after discharge and use the self-denial and rebill process to make the switch from Part A to Part B. As with the condition code 44 process, this requires involvement of at least one physician member of the UR committee and notification of the patient and physician.
Cash flow will be slowed since a no-pay claim must first be submitted, but the self-denial process can be done without physician concurrence, payment is the same at the end, and most importantly you are complying with Medicare regulations.
And that should keep everyone content.
Program Note
Listen to Dr. Hirsch every Monday on Monitor Mondays, 10-10:30 a.m. EDT.
Let’s start with what seems to be a never-ending topic of conversation: the new policies by Medicare Advantage (MA) plans to deny or reduce payments
Hotly anticipated performance targets and payment amounts for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Advancing Chronic Care with Effective, Scalable Solutions (ACCESS) Model
Please log in to your account to comment on this article.
Expert presenters Kathy Pride, RHIT, CPC, CCS-P, CPMA, and Brandi Russell, RHIA, CCS, COC, CPMA, break down complex fracture care coding rules, walk through correct modifier application (-25, -57, 54, 55), and clarify sequencing for initial and subsequent encounters. Attendees will gain the practical knowledge needed to submit clean claims, ensure compliance, and stay one step ahead of payer audits in 2026.
Accurately determining the principal diagnosis is critical for compliant billing, appropriate reimbursement, and valid quality reporting — yet it remains one of the most subjective and error-prone areas in inpatient coding. In this expert-led session, Cheryl Ericson, RN, MS, CCDS, CDIP, demystifies the complexities of principal diagnosis assignment, bridging the gap between coding rules and clinical reality. Learn how to strengthen your organization’s coding accuracy, reduce denials, and ensure your documentation supports true medical necessity.
Denials continue to delay reimbursement, increase administrative burden, and threaten financial stability across healthcare organizations. This essential webcast tackles the root causes—rising payer scrutiny, fragmented workflows, inconsistent documentation, and underused analytics—and offers proven, data-driven strategies to prevent and overturn denials. Attendees will gain practical tools to strengthen documentation and coding accuracy, engage clinicians effectively, and leverage predictive analytics and AI to identify risks before they impact revenue. Through real-world case examples and actionable guidance, this session empowers coding, CDI, and revenue cycle professionals to shift from reactive appeals to proactive denial prevention and revenue protection.
Sepsis remains one of the most frequently denied and contested diagnoses, creating costly revenue loss and compliance risks. In this webcast, Angela Comfort, DBA, MBA, RHIA, CDIP, CCS, CCS-P, provides practical, real-world strategies to align documentation with coding guidelines, reconcile Sepsis-2 and Sepsis-3 definitions, and apply compliant queries. You’ll learn how to identify and address documentation gaps, strengthen provider engagement, and defend diagnoses against payer scrutiny—equipping you to protect reimbursement, improve SOI/ROM capture, and reduce audit vulnerability in this high-risk area.
Join Ronald Hirsch, MD, FACP, CHCQM for The PEPPER Returns – Risk and Opportunity at Your Fingertips, a practical webcast that demystifies the PEPPER and shows you how to turn complex claims data into actionable insights. Dr. Hirsch will explain how to interpret key measures, identify compliance risks, uncover missed revenue opportunities, and understand new updates in the PEPPER, all to help your organization stay ahead of audits and use this powerful data proactively.
Stay ahead of the 2026-2027 audit surge with “Top 10 Audit Targets for 2026-2027 for Hospitals & Physicians: Protect Your Revenue,” a high-impact webcast led by Michael Calahan, PA, MBA. This concise session gives hospitals and physicians clear insight into the most likely federal audit targets, such as E/M services, split/shared and critical care, observation and admissions, device credits, and Two-Midnight Rule changes, and shows how to tighten documentation, coding, and internal processes to reduce denials, recoupments, and penalties. Attendees walk away with practical best practices to protect revenue, strengthen compliance, and better prepare their teams for inevitable audits.
As AI reshapes healthcare compliance, the risk of biased outputs and opaque decision-making grows. This webcast, led by Frank Cohen, delivers a practical Four-Pillar Governance Framework—Transparency, Accountability, Fairness, and Explainability—to help you govern AI-driven claim auditing with confidence. Learn how to identify and mitigate bias, implement robust human oversight, and document defensible AI review processes that regulators and auditors will accept. Discover concrete remedies, from rotation protocols to uncertainty scoring, and actionable steps to evaluate vendors before contracts are signed. In a regulatory landscape that moves faster than ever, gain the tools to stay compliant, defend your processes, and reduce liability while maintaining operational effectiveness.
Get clear, practical answers to Medicare’s most confusing regulations. Join Dr. Ronald Hirsch as he breaks down real-world compliance challenges and shares guidance your team can apply right away.
Happy National Doctor’s Day! Learn how to get a complimentary webcast on ‘Decoding Social Admissions’ as a token of our heartfelt appreciation! Click here to learn more →
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 1 with code CYBER25
CYBER WEEK IS HERE! Don’t miss your chance to get 20% off now until Dec. 2 with code CYBER24
